// $gooaudioplayer = file_get_contents('http://gameofowns.com/audioplayer.html'); // echo $gooaudioplayer;

D&D more ruthless than GRRM

Filed Under: Press, Speculation

Mo Ryan talked to George R.R. Martin at the Television Critics Association press tour in January, and has now published the full interview. They discuss GRRM’s views on the adaptation, the cuts, the additions, and how his views and imagination compare to what we are going to see on the show.

In addition to the January interview George has done a conference call with the media on Monday, providing more bits of information. Those are summarized at the end of the article. George is apparently likely to write an episode concerned with the Battle of the Blackwater should there be a second season.

One very interesting detail that came up in a separate conference call scheduled on the same day has been revealed by Elio of Westeros:

According to GRRM, a character is killed in this 1st season of the series who does not die until the 3rd novel. Because of spoilers, he chose not to discuss it further (I tried!), but he did indicate it was a male character.

Benioff and Weiss deliberately made the change, which has interesting implications all of its own… such as already looking to find ways to trim down a potential third season by closing out or greatly compressing elements of A Storm of Swords.

This links back to an answer from GRRM in the January interview:

The main concern that I flagged David and Dan with was … what I call “the butterfly effect” … there are many minor characters that appear, and it looks as though, “OK, we can cut this character.” … But then in Book 3, that character has a huge role to play … I try to tell them about it. Sometimes they address it, sometimes not, in which case, two seasons from now, if we’re still on the air, we’ll see how they deal with that.

Hear Me Roar: It’s great to read something really fresh after a host of interviews all similar to each other. Who could be the mysterious unfortunate character? Some of you have already discussed this, others are invited to join in the comments. Beware of spoilers!

Tagged as , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Have you already read all the books and/or don't care about spoilers? You can reveal all the spoilers in the comments with the click of a link below.

179 Comments

  1. Joohnson
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    Hasn’t it been widely assumed that it’s Beric?

      Quote  Reply

  2. Charles
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    it’s gotta be Rast! And i’m first post yay

      Quote  Reply

  3. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    My money is on Renly.

      Quote  Reply

  4. Tywin's Bastard
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Ran of Westeros has said that it has to do with a very minor character.

      Quote  Reply

  5. Champ
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Yeah, 99% sure it’s Rast.

      Quote  Reply

  6. sparrow
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Will Perkins,

    renly doesn’t die in the third book, he dies in the second, I’d be surprised if it’s him

      Quote  Reply

  7. Convivial Edd
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Spoilers people!

    Although I guess this entire post is about spoilers.

      Quote  Reply

  8. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    sparrow,

    My mistake… it’s been a while since I’ve read the books.

      Quote  Reply

  9. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    Has anyone thought they would do something nuts like take out… SPOILER

    Robb or Catelyn early… That would be crazy right??

      Quote  Reply

  10. DendasGarrett
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    Rast seems like a likely candidate. He has a very minor role in the books and has little influence on the overall story (if i remember correctly), not like Renly or someone who effects alot of the events going on.

    Plus they seem to have given him a fair bit of screen time looking at some of the trailers, so yeah, I’m going with Rast, good guess guys.

    D & D are faithful enough not to kill off someone important… I hope…

      Quote  Reply

  11. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:14 am | Permalink

    Will Perkins,

    Doesn’t Renly die in the second book?

      Quote  Reply

  12. Missentity
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:14 am | Permalink

    Can someone remind me when Rast dies? Was it by wights during the big ranging or was it by wildlings during the wall battle?

      Quote  Reply

  13. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    I think we’d all like it to be Rast, but I’m thinking it’s someone a little more important with the whole condensing season 3 comment. My guess is Rickard Karstark. Who is going to probably be slain by Jaime in the whispering woods. Therefore when Cat releases him (Jaime) in the third season the whole Karstark house will just leave and go looking for him and foresake Robb. Do I like this scenario? No. I would definately miss Robb having to execute him but I can see this happening to condense the story a bit.

      Quote  Reply

  14. Ikertzeke
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    It has to be Rast or Lord Hoster Tully, otherwise we are screwed!
    From Westeros´ forum, with one addition, Lord Hoster Tully, the potential candidates: Jeor Mormont, Joffrey Baratheon, Rast, Robb Stark, Tywin Lannister.

      Quote  Reply

  15. NorwegianDevil
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    It can’t be Beric can it? How are we going to get undead Cat without Beric? IMO he’s essential to the story so I just can’t see him getting killed of so early.
    Also he does not feature much in the first book, and his storyline is quite small but his role is a very important one.

      Quote  Reply

  16. Martin
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    How about Theon Greyjoy ? can’t remember whether he dies at the end of ACoK or in SoS. His death in S1 would save a whole strand, and they could report – from memory the only 2 things they would need to orchestrate would be Bran / Rickon / Osha and the ‘Frog Eaters’ (I forget names) leaving the castle – and the destruction of Winterfell. This could still be done by Greyjoys attacking off screen – with the children fleeing under the protection of Osha et al. It would also be one whole set area removed for the Ironmen, their ships, and cast (Asha etc.) – I’m not sure on the overall impact on the books (it’s a while since I read beyond SoS), but if they are looking to reduce the scope of later series, it would need to be a relatively significant character / plot thread

      Quote  Reply

  17. Ikertzeke
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    Missentity,
    wildlings during the wall battle

      Quote  Reply

  18. Ellen
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    My money’s on Jeor Mormont. After all, it’d give Jon more to do in the first season.

      Quote  Reply

  19. Clambake
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    Robb. Why are these posts blacked out? Are some spoilers okay and others aren’t?

      Quote  Reply

  20. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Martin,

    Only one problem with that, Theon’s still alive.
    That’s a little Dance spoiler for ya.

      Quote  Reply

  21. bgrahambo
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Off Topic: I heard a bit on National Public Radio this morning about Game of Thrones. Quick summary: They introduced it as “Sopranos in Middle Earth”, had a sound bite from Dave and Martin (both I’d heard before), and commented that “The field is ripe for an epic fantasy TV series”. They also predicted that what HBO is hoping to do with this series is pull in a new crowd of subscribers: The fantasy crowd (also referred to as geeks)

    There was a bit more to it, but that summary covers most of it. Not terribly interesting, but still fun to hear about it on the radio this morning. Probably reached a few more people who hadn’t heard about it before.

      Quote  Reply

  22. Lossoth
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    I bet it’s Hoster Tully. And they might merge Edmure and Bryndyn into one character.

      Quote  Reply

  23. Cajunman
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    its, without a doubt, Hoster Tully

      Quote  Reply

  24. Sam's pink mast
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    Jack Slap,

    They can’t do that. CoK and SoS would both fall apart without them. But here’s an equally crazy theory. Maybe the hound is going to go on his church retreat early. It probably is Rast though, or any number of other members of the watch. Book three is a bad one for them. I’d have deserted toward the end of book one. “What? We’re about to start A Clash of Kings? No, thank you. Y’all are gonna have to chase me!”

      Quote  Reply

  25. Ikertzeke
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    Martin,

    Impossible, he is still alive!

      Quote  Reply

  26. NorwegianDevil
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    My monies on Rast as well. But that wouldn’t help condensing the 3rd season.
    I’m hoping that A Storm of Swords gets two season. I’m rereading ASOS now and theres just so much happening in that book that I doubt they would be able to do it in one season without cutting a lot very important material!

      Quote  Reply

  27. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    Okay, well, it’s not Theon, because Theon is still alive. He’s got a POV in ADwD.

    I have this sinking feeling in my gut that it’s gonna be Tywin. I really hope I’m wrong, but with GRRM saying the character has an important role to play in Book 3, I really doubt he’s talking about Rast or Rickard Karstark, not to mention if Beric’s death is shown, it doesn’t really matter, because he can be brought back.

    Very, very concerned now. I just have this sinking feeling that it’s either Rob, Jeor, Joffrey or, horror of horrors, Tywin.

      Quote  Reply

  28. Wild Willy J
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    I’m thinking it’s going to be marillion getting the axe on the high road to the eyrie, he’s a minor character that can be replaced by any random suitor when Sansa makes it back there at the end of ASOS Whats my prize if I’m right?

      Quote  Reply

  29. Knurk
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:28 am | Permalink

    Clambake,

    no, ALL spoilers are non-okay. Again two megaspoilers in the comments that aren’t blacked out… People need to realize that a lot of people here haven’t read the third book yet.

      Quote  Reply

  30. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    Whoah, wait! I just realized it can’t be Robb, because D&D gave an interview where they specifically talk about how they’re going to have Robb play a more substantial part in Season 2 than was shown in the book, seeming to say that we’re actually going to see his battles and romance with Jeyne Westerling rather than just hear them talked about.

      Quote  Reply

  31. Jack
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    I can’t see through the spoiler boxes on my iPhone and it’s DRIVING ME CRAZY

      Quote  Reply

  32. Knurk
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Josh Parker,

    I can’t guarantee anything, but I’m pretty sure they’re not going to cut him in season one. He has the most epic death of the whole series!

      Quote  Reply

  33. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:33 am | Permalink

    How does this relate to Dungeons & Dragons? I’m don’t see any connection to or mention of D&D.

      Quote  Reply

  34. Missentity
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Josh Parker,

    I dunno, doesn’t Rast help kill the Old Bear in book 3? I would consider that pretty importanat.

      Quote  Reply

  35. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Josh Parker,

    I kind of doubt any of those would be offed in season one, there is too much story to be cut with any one of them and the ramifications would be emense and it wouldn’t be the same story. D&D are smarter than that.

      Quote  Reply

  36. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    The clues are:

    1. Male
    2. Dies in third book
    3. Will greatly compress third book

    sparrow: renly doesn’t die in the third book, he dies in the second, I’d be surprised if it’s him

    True. It’s not Renly.

    Charles: it’s gotta be Rast!

    Male — check. Dies in SoS — check. Will “greatly compress” third book- no. It’s not Rast.

    Joohnson: Hasn’t it been widely assumed that it’s Beric?

    Male — Check. Dies in SoS — I’d say yes. (I know some may dispute that, but he’s bracketed in the Appendix of AFFC.) Will “greatly compress” SoS. I’d say yes. Maybe not per se, but as part of the removal of a whole bunch of BwB and Arya stuff.

    So far, I’d say it’s Beric, but I’m not more than … 65% on it.

      Quote  Reply

  37. Trishkabibble
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    It’s been a while since my last read– when is Gregor supposed to die/undeadify?

    And D&D isn’t Dungeons and Dragons– it’s the writers of the show.

      Quote  Reply

  38. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    It’s a very minor character who gets killed off early, so no POV Character, member of the big families or person in charge of an organisation.

    I’ve been saying it’s Rast *for since we first heard of this but even he may be too major from what Ran has been told.

    *My theory Rast gets killed by a Wight instead of Ser Jaremy Rykker who is not in the show.

      Quote  Reply

  39. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    What about Gregor? I know technically he doesn’t die until book 4, but he never makes an appearance in it.

      Quote  Reply

  40. Larry
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    hey this is a bit spoilery with no warning, no?

      Quote  Reply

  41. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    What about Gregor? I know technically he doesn’t die until book 4, but he never makes an appearance in it.

      Quote  Reply

  42. Dom
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:40 am | Permalink

    Ran says the character we’re talking about is “VERY minor”.
    So Beric, Jeor, Robb, Cat, Tywin are not going to hit the bucket before their time, I think. I would say Rast instead of Rykker, although I can’t see how that could trim the storyline in ASOS…my money’s on Lord Karstark

      Quote  Reply

  43. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:41 am | Permalink

    I really hope all of you are right.

    No, Rast has no part in the killing of the Old Bear. That’s all on Garth of Greenaway, Ollo Lophand and Dirk. Rast isn’t even mentioned in that scene.

      Quote  Reply

  44. McSherrie
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    Josh Parker,

    Sadly I think that it might be Tywin too. Marillion is, however, an interesting choice and would make sense as he really has no part in aCoK and GRRM did specify that the character wasn’t important again until aSoS….

    Hmmm…

      Quote  Reply

  45. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:44 am | Permalink

    Dom: although I can’t see how that could trim the storyline in ASOS

    Where has it been said that the death was brought forward for that reason?

    If it is Rast and if he dies where I said then the reason is because he replaces the named character who dies in the book (but is not in the show), nothing to do with trimming the story in book 3.

      Quote  Reply

  46. jwsnasa
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:44 am | Permalink

    My money is on Hoster Tulley or one of the King’s Guard

      Quote  Reply

  47. RitariKnight
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    So they want Martin to write the Battle of the Blackwater, eh? We’re talking about the biggest battle in Book 2 here, right? And a scriptwriter who’s middle initials R.R. stand for “unfilmable script”. I wonder how many drafts he’ll have to go through before it gets approved.

    I can already hear D&D saying, “No, no, no, George, we have a budget, you know. This thing is great, but it would cost more than the Lord of the Rings trilogy did. You have to cut this and this and this and that one’s gotta go, too. Sorry!”

    Hey, I’d love to see Martin’s script for that episode on my telly, I just don’t think HBO is going to give them an extra $300m just for one episode, though.

      Quote  Reply

  48. Martin
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    OK so consider myself up the left with my suggestion – Theon – I had stayed away from potential spoilers on ADwD – until now – dooh

    Presumably there is a reason for bring this character’s death forwards – and that would primarily be to compress S3 by dropping a strand. I can’t see how Rast would do that.

      Quote  Reply

  49. Nick
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Ran later confirmed it was much more minor than he originally thought, and that we can rule out people like Beric, Hoster and Karstark. It is almost certainly Rast.

      Quote  Reply

  50. Dom
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Mormegil: Where has it been said that the death was brought forward for that reason?

    Well, the sentence:

    Benioff and Weiss deliberately made the change, which has interesting implications all of its own… such as already looking to find ways to trim down a potential third season by closing out or greatly compressing elements of A Storm of Swords.

    sounds pretty straightforward to me.

      Quote  Reply

  51. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    jwsnasa,

    The problem with that is that he’s not in this season. I suppose it’s perfectly reasonable to have a messenger come to Catelyn and tell her that he died, but the way this is phrased makes me think it will be an onscreen death, or the death of someone we have seen in person.

      Quote  Reply

  52. jwsnasa
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    OR……Symon Silvertongue

      Quote  Reply

  53. Cajunman
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    Sorry guys, its Hooster Tully. He dies in season 2, but if its moved up to season 1, all that story line, including Tansy can easily be moved into season 1 without a hitch. Then, Season 2 can cram more stuff, including the beginning of ASOS, just as season 1 will encompass some things that actually occur in ACOK. The result is that Season 3, which can actually drag a bit in the middle, will start about 1/4 the way thru ASOS, resulting in a seemly quicker pace and the possibility that the whole Season 3 can be filmed in 10 or 12 episodes.

      Quote  Reply

  54. Lord of Fangs
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    People…it is only SPECULATED that the purpose of the death was to condense the storyline of ASoS for television…NOWHERE has it been confirmed by the writers/HBO/GRRM that this was the purpose of this unexpected death (at least not that I’ve seen, and I’ve read into this ‘gate’ a bit). For all we know, it could just be part of the adaptation for television (ie Rast providing a more dramatic television moment, being a ‘featured’ character and rival to Jon Snow who is slain by a wight instead of Rykker…in fact, this or Hoster Tully is my best guess).

    So let’s just relax, huh? All we know for sure is that a non-major male character who dies in the third book instead dies in Season 1. Period.

      Quote  Reply

  55. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    Dom: Ran says the character we’re talking about is “VERY minor”.

    Okay. I guess the riddle is who’s (1) male, (2) dies in third book, (3) is VERY minor, and (4) will greatly reduce the size of SoS if killed in the first book? (Or be part of a reduction?)

    I can risk an argument that, in the whole scheme of things, Beric is very minor. If it’s some guy that’s only mentioned once or twice why would anyone be talking about it? He’s not a POV character. He only appears in 4 chapters in GoT ( Eddard VI, Sansa II, Eddard XI, and Sansa III).

      Quote  Reply

  56. Enteril
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    Guys, you realize the GRRM quote up there is NOT in response to this, right? He was giving a hypothetical example about having a “major role in season 3 to play.” In this example, it is a minor character.

      Quote  Reply

  57. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    If we can take what GRRM says at face value then Rast is too minor. Marillion is an interesting and plausible choice, since anyone can be fingered for the murder of Lysa but for my mind Beric is the most logical of all – he’s a very minor character who does one major thing and I see no reason why his role couldn’t be merged with Thoros.

      Quote  Reply

  58. mummer
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    Mike Chair: Will greatly compress third book

    ARGH NO NO NO PLEASE EVERYONE STOP AND TAKE A DEEP BREATH.

    The way Hear Me Roar summarized those linked articles was a little confusing, and people are jumping to some wrong conclusions. GRRM did NOT say that this particular character has a large role in book 3– and he did NOT say that D&D made this particular change in order to compress the story.

    The first part was a hypothetical situation that GRRM brought up, something that he said could potentially happen with lots of characters if he didn’t communicate well enough with D&D. And the second part was totally a guess by Elio, who was trying to think of reasons why D&D might be killing off characters early in general.

    Elio/Ran has posted several clarifications since then, to say that he’s been told it’s “a VERY MINOR character”, i.e. very unlikely to have any real effect on book 3. Unfortunately, as soon as he got the rumor storm calmed down a little on that board, HMR started a new one here…

      Quote  Reply

  59. Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    Big news

    Almost there!

      Quote  Reply

  60. Quiet Wolf
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    Your man is Marillion. He is at the Inn at the Crossroads and I dont rememver see him on any of the Eyrie Footage. I bet he had his manhood chopped off,… goats.. you all know how it works, by some Shaggas friends.

      Quote  Reply

  61. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    Okay, if we’re back to him being minor, then we’re pretty much back to Rast.

    If it is Hoster, sorry, Cajunman, but it will be an offscreen death and we’ll never meet him. It’s been established by GRRM and D&D that other than Catelyn or Lysa, we get no Tullys this season. No, not even the Blackfish. And especially not Hoster.

      Quote  Reply

  62. jwsnasa
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    Mike Chair,

    It can’t be Beric. Even though he’s hardly seen in the books, his Brotherhood Without Banners is crucial to the backdrop of story. BWB is the underground resistance to Lannister rule, not to mention the vehicle in which we get Undead Cat.

      Quote  Reply

  63. Rob
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    new to commenting here…I also have the sinking feeling it will be Tywin, and here’s why:
    (1) he’s a significant enough character that it’s worth GRRM noting his early termination (since he does die in book 3, unlike Renly)
    (2) unlike Rast or some others that were mentioned, he actually has a role to play in book 3 and all the other books such that killing him earlier could allow condensing of the third season
    (3) while his role in book 3 (and thus season 3) is relatively important (someone has to plan the Red Wedding and bring all the players together to pull it off, make the right deals etc.), quite frankly, I could see them giving that role to another character whose continued existence is VITAL for other reasons than to provide the menacing calculating opposition to Robb Stark…for instance, I could see them allowing Walder Frey to take Tywin’s role as chief orchestrator of the Red Wedding, or give the role to Cersei (not Jaime or Tyrion, since the former would lack credibility to come up with that sort of thing and his captivity makes it impossible, and it would ruin the portrayal and development of Tyrion’s character to have him plan the deed)

    That said, the main reason I believe it might be Tywin is that I could see various parts of his role being just as easily divided between and carried by Cersei, Tyrion, Jaime, Lord Frey, etc. I don’t know really how much screen time this would save, plus there’s the problem of Tyrion’s development through the killing of his father at the end, and if they have him kill Tywin earlier, what then, etc.

    I just feel it’s gotta be someone relatively significant, else it would make no difference in condensing the series…

    Hoster Tully kicking it earlier might save us a few scenes too…I don’t see how Jeor can die early without complicating Jon’s rise to commander…Joffrey is a maybe…I suppose they could’ve decided that one season of his incompetence and cruelty is sufficient and it’s ongoing presence in the second and third could be as easily replaced by Cersei ruling in a similarly incompetent manner…Joff exists merely to torture Sansa for the most part and lives only slightly longer than the other contestants for the Iron Throne, partly, I think, to spite our fantasy notions of cosmic justice…cutting him early would, like Tywin, give Cersei the opportunity for a bigger role, and she can easily swallow it I think…Again, there would be the problem of explaining Tyrion’s departure without him being accused of the deed…though, if tywin or joff are the ones, he could always flee because he’s accused of the murder of the other, so long as only one of them is the one cut early

      Quote  Reply

  64. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    I’ve been following Winter’s conversation on Twitter, and I am just dumbfounded that professional writers, who publish primarily on the internet, so thin skinned about reaction to their criticism. By anonymous commenters on the internet. Not only, that, but I feel like the overall reaction by this fan community has been very balanced and rational by most standards. Color me confused.

      Quote  Reply

  65. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    Everybody suggesting Marillion, I already got schooled in that one. He doesn’t die in book 3. He is merely framed, jailed, and in book four a confession is forced out of him.

      Quote  Reply

  66. Team Sansa
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    What about this as a theory: Could the Karstark betrayal/death happen early in order to establish Robb as a fair and just Lord, tying him to the viewers as Eddard’s son in spirit and action and show that he is willing to make tough decisions. This would set up the KotN quite well.

    My other thought is that if it happens to be Tywin, which would totally bum me out, they could use Kevan to sub in for Tywin’s Lannister stuff later on in the books.
    One last thing: I’m a first time poster and have finally gotten the courage to comment, so this might have already been discussed in other forums, but the “butterfly effect” that GRRM refers to could really get sticky if HBO does the whole series. For example, combining Blackfish with Edmure would be horrible – I think that Brynden’s role could be huge in subsequent books. Notice how terrified Jaime is that he’s on the loose at the end of aFFC? I’m still steaming that Blackfish isn’t in this season. I hope GRRM sticks to his guns and continues writing the books without the TV show in mind. Let D&D figure out how to make these decisions later.

      Quote  Reply

  67. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    mummer,

    Then what in seven hells does this mean:

    According to GRRM, a character is killed in this 1st season of the series who does not die until the 3rd novel. Because of spoilers, he chose not to discuss it further (I tried!), but he did indicate it was a male character.

    Benioff and Weiss deliberately made the change, which has interesting implications all of its own… such as already looking to find ways to trim down a potential third season by closing out or greatly compressing elements of A Storm of Swords.

    Why, if he is VERY minor, would it spoil anything to reveal him now?

    Why would D&D be “more ruthless than GRRM” if its a pure nobody.

    And why would we be taking about it?

    Why, mummer, WHY?!

      Quote  Reply

  68. The Reader
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    NPR’s Morning addition had a story about GoT this morning on my way to work. A link to the story:

    http://www.npr.org/2011/04/14/135385959/hbo-lures-fantasy-fans-with-game-of-thrones

    Nothing new in the story – typical comparison to Lord of the Rings and The Sopranos. Still, it was nice to hear Ned on my morning commute.

      Quote  Reply

  69. Rob
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    new to commenting here…I also have the sinking feeling it will be Tywin, and here’s why:
    (1) he’s a significant enough character that it’s worth GRRM noting his early termination (since he does die in book 3, unlike Renly)
    (2) unlike Rast or some others that were mentioned, he actually has a role to play in book 3 and all the other books such that killing him earlier could allow condensing of the third season
    (3) while his role in book 3 (and thus season 3) is relatively important (someone has to plan the Red Wedding and bring all the players together to pull it off, make the right deals etc.), quite frankly, I could see them giving that role to another character whose continued existence is VITAL for other reasons than to provide the menacing calculating opposition to Robb Stark…for instance, I could see them allowing Walder Frey to take Tywin’s role as chief orchestrator of the Red Wedding, or give the role to Cersei (not Jaime or Tyrion, since the former would lack credibility to come up with that sort of thing and his captivity makes it impossible, and it would ruin the portrayal and development of Tyrion’s character to have him plan the deed)

    That said, the main reason I believe it might be Tywin is that I could see various parts of his role being just as easily divided between and carried by Cersei, Tyrion, Jaime, Lord Frey, etc. I don’t know really how much screen time this would save, plus there’s the problem of Tyrion’s development through the killing of his father at the end, and if they have him kill Tywin earlier, what then, etc.

    I just feel it’s gotta be someone relatively significant, else it would make no difference in condensing the series…

    Hoster Tully kicking it earlier might save us a few scenes too…I don’t see how Jeor can die early without complicating Jon’s rise to commanderJoffrey is a maybe…I suppose they could’ve decided that one season of his incompetence and cruelty is sufficient and it’s ongoing presence in the second and third could be as easily replaced by Cersei ruling in a similarly incompetent manner…Joff exists merely to torture Sansa for the most part and lives only slightly longer than the other contestants for the Iron Throne, partly, I think, to spite our fantasy notions of cosmic justice…cutting him early would, as with Tywin, give Cersei the opportunity for a bigger role, and she can easily swallow it I think…Again, there would be the problem of explaining Tyrion’s departure without him being accused of the deed…though, if tywin or joff are the ones, he could always flee because he’s accused of the murder of the other, so long as only one of them is the one cut early

      Quote  Reply

  70. ralia
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    According to EW HBO is not nervous about Ganme of Thrones: http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/04/14/game-of-thrones-season-two/

      Quote  Reply

  71. Notmy Realname
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    I’m going with Hoster Tully, 100%. An early death for Rast won’t compress Season 3 any, and to be frank Rast is unimportant enough that they could just write him out or make him “that nameless guy who doesn’t like Jon.” On the other hand, Hoster Tully doesn’t really do anything except mumble and die. We get saved a lot of tedious scenes with Catelyn at his deathbed. It changes the plot not a whit to have had Edmure as de jure Lord of Riverrun as well as de facto.

    Plus, it also allows them to cut the Blackfish from Season 1, since he wouldn’t be at the Eyrie, he’d be back in Riverrun. So it’s really practical.

      Quote  Reply

  72. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    jwsnasa,

    Like I said, I’m no more than 65% on … him (my spoiler button disappeared).

    They’re talking about trimming the story down. He isn’t crucial enough to ruin the thing if he’s offed early. That’s all I’m saying. He’s got to be important enough to be an issue but not so important to derail the storyline (plus the other elements of the riddle).

      Quote  Reply

  73. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    of the characters discussed, the ones that make the most sense to me: Rickard Karstark and Rast. if they kill off Tywin in the first season, then Tyrion doesn’t get his penultimate moment at the end of Storm. it cannot be Tywin

    Lossoth,

    that would be horrendous. Edmure & the Blackfish cannot in any way be combined into one character

      Quote  Reply

  74. Sam's pink mast
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    If it says in the post to expect spoilers, that’s exactly what one can expect. Black boxes be damned on this one. People are forewarned. If they come to the comments of this post, they might see some shit that’ll melt their face like the Ark of the Covenant. And if all spoilers are bad, then how the hell are there episode scripting posts?
    I fully support the spoiler ban on general posts for this site and george’s blog, but if there is a post that talk specifically about events in books you haven’t read on a show you haven’t seen maybe you shouldn’t be reading that post. It’s like if I’m walking around town and I somehow wander into the ghetto, I will probably go back the way I came because I don’t want to get “spoilered”. And, yes. In this instance I am equating spoilers with getting shot in the face five times and having my Jordans stolen. That’s why I wear penny loafers to the ghetto, muthafucka!

      Quote  Reply

  75. Notmy Realname
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    Notmy Realname,

    Also, killing off Beric limits their options somewhat. They haven’t plotted out Season 3 yet. They might get feedback and want to go one way or another–depending on fan reaction they might really want to emphasize the BwB. They might plot it out and realize that they really need the BwB or else everything else falls down. The point is that they don’t know yet, and if they want to get around the BwB, they can do it later. Whereas if Hoster Tully is alive while Catelyn is in Riverrun, we’re going to be seeing a lot of “Tansy…”. And it’s pretty skippable.

      Quote  Reply

  76. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    Mike Chair,

    It just sounds as if whoever wrote this post that we are commenting in right now, piecemealed together a bunch of different stories, and they are now turning into something they shouldn’t be.

    What Mummer said is the correct way of it. In the past, GRRM has said he has to make sure D&D don’t cut out characters and plotlines that will seriously matter down the road.

    Ran, much later, talked about how a character was going to die earlier, who dies in season 3. Never was it said that it was a main character to condense later seasons, and infact, it was later clarified that it was a very small character.

    This is just a classic case of wires getting crossed.

      Quote  Reply

  77. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    Okay. Now that we have some more infor, I highly doubt its someone as unimportant as Rast. Unfortunately I think this news makes it more likely that my previous speculation of Beric becomes stronger. Think about it. There is nothing Beric does in the script short of makin Jeyne Poole drool that Thoros cannot do. He has a flamig sword. He can breathe life into Cat down the line.Also. with the prominence of R”hllor in the third season, Thoros akes more sense to keep if you need to cut one of the two. I’d love a Thoros/Melisandre confrntation in a later book as well. If this turns out to be true, its sad news, but I understand. There are just too many characters as the story goes on to keep things as diverse as they are in the book. In fact, if the have to start making extracutions or outright cuts to the story, this is probably a pretty good place to make a move. Other BwoBs might be extracuted as well. Look for a guy with a bow and another guy wearing a yellow cloak in the background. D&D if you do go this route, I only ask that your please, please please keep Tom Sevenstrings around.

      Quote  Reply

  78. Caedes
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    I keep thinking it’s Beric. But if only to see his gruesome death at the hands of Gregor, to add even more despair at the end of the season. The fair knight Ned Stark sent to stop the Mountain’s raids gets a horrible ending. The bad guy wins. And it will add even more shock when he comes back from the dead.

      Quote  Reply

  79. youandwhosearmy
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    It’s Lord Karstark.

    And it makes perfect sense to throw that into Robb’s becoming King arc. It’s the gloomy flipside to his KING IN THE NORTH triumph, and the sting in the tail of the Whispering Wood.

    There are some hilarious and illogical suggestions going on in this thread though. A few characters discussed that aren’t even dead, some that couldn’t possibly be killed off. Honestly, Tywin? The chief antagonist? You need to think these things through more before you post, guys.

      Quote  Reply

  80. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    Dom: Well, the sentence:sounds pretty straightforward to me.

    For one thing that was just speculation by Ran.

    Plus that was written by Ran when he was still under the impression that the character was someone of note (secondary or tertiary character).

    He’s since been told it is a very minor character.

      Quote  Reply

  81. Jarno
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    Eeek.. I started reading the books a few months ago in anticipation of the TV-series (and absolutely fell in love with them), but I’m not even halfway through the third book yet and would hate for it to be spoiled by something that happens in the show!

    Better start reading a lot faster! Who could it be?

    *MUST STAY AWAY FROM SPOILERS!*

      Quote  Reply

  82. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    Too much Plot unravels if it is Tywin. Sending Tyrion as his representative as Hand of the King. The Dynamic of the Lannisters is how the Tywin controls them all, losing that element greatly diminishes the political intrigue. Losing the Lannister Mastermind would be a huge blow, I don’t think they would make that kind of mistake.

      Quote  Reply

  83. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    Tre Svatek,

    “The main concern that I flagged David and Dan with was … what I call “the butterfly effect” … there are many minor characters that appear, and it looks as though, “OK, we can cut this character.” … But then in Book 3, that character has a huge role to play … I try to tell them about it. Sometimes they address it, sometimes not, in which case, two seasons from now, if we’re still on the air, we’ll see how they deal with that.”

    He says basically its a minor character in book one, who blossoms into a (at least fairly) major character by book 3. That’s not (b)Rast(b). I guess speculation depends on your definitions of major and minor, but to me (b) Beriic(b) is the most likely person to fit that bill.

      Quote  Reply

  84. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    If they kill Tywin there will be outrage. His final scene alone is worth keeping him alive. With Tyrion killing Shea and him on the privy the build up to that moment through all of Tyrion’s POVs throughout the three books is one of the main threads of the novels. Heck Dinklage even mentions the relationship in his interviews. I seriously doubt this is who they are talking about.

      Quote  Reply

  85. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    Notmy Realname: I’m going with Hoster Tully, 100%

    I believe he’s a contender. He fits all the elements. But I can’t be 100% on anyone.

    Rob: I also have the sinking feeling it will be Tywin

    The thing about Tywin is killing him early would change the story too much. His actual death is a watershed moment. It influences everything that follows. He’s the only real check on Cersei. Once he dies she’s pure unrestrained, unadulterated psychosis on parade. It’s great.

      Quote  Reply

  86. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    Sorry for non spoilers tere. The buttons weren’t up so I tried to do it by hand. Silly me. Won’t make that mistake again and WiC please feel free to black out the appropriate stuff.

      Quote  Reply

  87. mummer
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    Mike Chair:

    mummer,
    Then what in seven hells does this mean:

    Why, if he is VERY minor, would it spoil anything to reveal him now?

    Why would D&D be “more ruthless than GRRM” if its a pure nobody.

    And why would we be taking about it?

    Why, mummer, WHY?!

    I can’t even tell if you’re serious now, but in case you are:

    1. Why would GRRM want to give away the death of even a minor character, when it’s a detail that even people who have read the book don’t know about? He’s never given out plot details like that from the show in any interview.

    2. The “more ruthless” bit was a headline written by Hear Me Roar, who has no special knowledge about this and (I think) may have misread the quoted articles.

    3. If you don’t know why you’re talking about it, I can’t help you with that.

    Look, again, the thing you quoted about compressing the third season was written by Ran as speculation– it’s not a quote or summary of anything that GRRM or anyone on the show said. And the same guy, Ran, later followed up to say that it was definitely a minor character (which he had not known when he wrote the first part), and that he hadn’t meant to imply any of the stuff you’re getting excited about. And Ran was the only source for this in the first place, so if you’re not willing to accept his explanation, then… I don’t know, have fun, I guess.

      Quote  Reply

  88. purplejilly
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    Martin,
    That was the first person who came to mind for me, too. Theon. He has the important task of faking the murder of Bran and Rickon, but it doesn’t HAVE to be him that does that.. Someone else coudl do it.

      Quote  Reply

  89. Tywin's Bastard
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    It’s funny how I wrote that Ran has confirmed it to be a “very minor character” very early in the thread (and it’s been repeated by a few others) and people keep speculating about really important ones, even those that don’t actually die in the third book.

    Read the thread before speculating, and do the research on when people die. ;)

      Quote  Reply

  90. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Tre Svatek: It just sounds as if whoever wrote this post that we are commenting in right now, piecemealed together a bunch of different stories, and they are now turning into something they shouldn’t be.

    mummer: The “more ruthless” bit was a headline written by Hear Me Roar, who has no special knowledge about this and (I think) may have misread the quoted articles.

    Hey, Hear Me Roar, where are you? Accusations have been made! You have been formally charged with unfair and deceptive posting. Come forth and defend yourself. Choose your weapon or choose your champion.

      Quote  Reply

  91. Oi!
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Ran wrote: MINOR character. I don’t even think Hoster fits how minor the character in fact is. But I can’t say much more, beyond the fact that no, I do not actually know who it is. I just know he’s VERY minor.

    Soooo its probably Rast

      Quote  Reply

  92. starkfanboy
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    i get the feeling people are just posting about this charachter death because they want to be shocked.
    Again it is about a VERY MINOR character AND his death has nothing to do with a 3 th season. So naming tywin, renly, karstark is way out of line.

      Quote  Reply

  93. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    purplejilly,

    Except he lives. That isn’t even a spoiler. His “death” at the conclusion of Book TWO (not three), is left ambiguous, which is a sure sign he didn’t really die.

      Quote  Reply

  94. mummer
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    Mike Chair,
    OK, I get it– you’re not serious about this, nothing I say matters, you’re just enjoying stirring up a commotion. Well like I said, have fun, but I kind of wish everyone else wasn’t taking the bait.

      Quote  Reply

  95. youandwhosearmy
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    It
    is
    Lord
    Rickard
    Karstark
    executed
    by
    Robb.

      Quote  Reply

  96. Tywin's Bastard
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    purplejilly,

    He’s probably not even dead (Cat got a string of his skin at the red wedding and the Bolton’s don’t aim to flay the dead], nor is he a very minor character (quite the contrary as he holds POV status).

      Quote  Reply

  97. NorwegianDevil
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    Mike Chair:
    jwsnasa,

    Like I said, I’m no more than 65% on … him (my spoiler button disappeared).

    They’re talking about trimming the story down.He isn’t crucial enough to ruin the thing if he’s offed early.That’s all I’m saying.He’s got to be important enough to be an issue but not so important to derail the storyline (plus the other elements of the riddle).

    But there is one problem here. The few scenes he’s in is very important to Aryas development. They can maybe cut Beric, but they can’t cut most of his scenes becasue it’s essential that Arya gets captured and brought to him so that she can be kidnapped by the hound. He is also essential to the story because his death brings Cat back to life.

    I would argue that allthough Beric does not appear much in the books and thats why we call him a minor character he is really a major character because his presence is so important to the story.

      Quote  Reply

  98. kerning
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    Whether it be minor character X, Y, or Z, my chief disappointment lies in the fact that–assuming they get a season 3–this rush to condense would suggest they’re not considering splitting up Storm of Swords into 2 seasons, as Martin has indicated is his preference.

    I hope I’m wrong, but I definitely agree with Martin. If they go to a season 3 and it’s just a single season, there is too much that’ll have to be cut to make it filmable. It’ll be a shadow of what it should represent.

      Quote  Reply

  99. purplejilly
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    This is good, this is very good, this is just what I needed to distract me these last few days ;(whew) a good MURDERGATE!
    Who is it?
    Whodunit?
    Why?
    We have our clues. We have the exhaustive and overwhelming brain power of House Gatewatch. The thread is exploding already.. Thank you GRRM! This will tide me over until Sunday, and already the Stockholm-Syndrome Gate is fading from my forethoughts . . .

      Quote  Reply

  100. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    To folks in the Hoster faction, I don’t think its him. He’s got too small, yet too crucial of a role to play. It would be way too easy to just extracute him to someone lying in a bed. Season 2 will need more stuff going on around RR, not less. Hoster, while minor in lines, revolves around alot of what goes on there.

    To people in the Theon camp. I find this even more unlikely. You could conceivably cut out some of the Iron Isles stuff, but by taking Theon out, you lose all the drama that goes on in the North as well I could see D&D combining him with Reek maybe, but that smacks of creating bigger problems than you are solving by cutting him.

      Quote  Reply

  101. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    mummer: OK, I get it– you’re not serious about this, nothing I say matters, you’re just enjoying stirring up a commotion. Well like I said, have fun, but I kind of wish everyone else wasn’t taking the bait

    Your premise challenges the integrity of this post. You claim that it can’t be certain people because the character must be VERY minor. My point is simple. If he is SO minor then why is it an issue at all? If you claim that it shouldn’t be an issue then the fault must lie with Hear Me Roar for putting it up here. WiC.net does not have history of putting up frivolous posts. They deserve the benefit of the doubt. They have the right to defend themselves. I have the right to Always Support the Bottom!

      Quote  Reply

  102. youandwhosearmy
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    I’m starting to wonder if some of you have even read the books. O_o

    Stop suggesting Theon. Theon is confirmed as alive, and he’s a POV character in ADWD.

    Stop suggesting Hoster. He doesn’t appear in the season, and thus cannot die in the season. Killing him offscreen achieves nothing.

      Quote  Reply

  103. Ikertzeke
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    Well, it looks like we have another GATE!
    Deathgate!Deathgate!Deathgate!Deathgate!

      Quote  Reply

  104. purplejilly
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Josh Parker,
    Oh, that’s right! Isn’t the report that he is getting flayed? I guess I was assuming that meant he was dead or dying, from the flaying, ya know? But hey, disfigurement and still living is a common thing in Westeros, eh??

      Quote  Reply

  105. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    Incidentally, since were taling extracution here. What if D&D combined Beric with Ser Hugh? Beric, the dashing knight at the tourney, gets killed by the Mountain Other than that, I’d love to see a Gregor/Beric throwdown after Ned sends men out to get the Mountain

      Quote  Reply

  106. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    Ikertzeke: Well, it looks like we have another GATE!
    Deathgate!Deathgate!Deathgate!Deathgate!

    For sure. I second the existence of DEATHGATE.

      Quote  Reply

  107. Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    Team Sansa:
    What about this as a theory: Could the Karstark betrayal/death happen early in order to establish Robb as a fair and just Lord, tying him to the viewers as Eddard’s son in spirit and action and show that he is willing to make tough decisions.This would set up the KotN quite well.

    Welcome, Team Sansa! I thought so too. If it happens in the last ep, it would bracket the season nicely between two you-know-whats.

    Team Sansa:
    One last thing: I’m a first time poster and have finally gotten the courage to comment, so this might have already been discussed in other forums, but the “butterfly effect” that GRRM refers to could really get sticky if HBO does the whole series.For example, combining Blackfish with Edmure would be horrible – I think that Brynden’s role could be huge in subsequent books.Notice how terrified Jaime is that he’s on the loose at the end of aFFC?I’m still steaming that Blackfish isn’t in this season.I hope GRRM sticks to his guns and continues writing the books without the TV show in mind.Let D&D figure out how to make these decisions later.

    Are we twins separated at birth? :D There must be a good reason for the Blackfish’s escape in AFFC.

    Notmy Realname:
    On the other hand, Hoster Tully doesn’t really do anything except mumble and die. We get saved a lot of tedious scenes with Catelyn at his deathbed. It changes the plot not a whit to have had Edmure as de jure Lord of Riverrun as well as de facto.

    Plus, it also allows them to cut the Blackfish from Season 1, since he wouldn’t be at the Eyrie, he’d be back in Riverrun. So it’s really practical.

    (sorry, I changed the spoilers because they just disappeared on me)
    Agreed, this reason for the Blackfish not being at the Eyrie is a real Ockham’s Razor. Although I’d miss the funeral boat, one of the best Blackfish scenes.

    Bottom line: Karstark or – less convinced – Hoster (Cat could get a raven about his death, but then why even mention him? just to make her suffer more? then again, GRRM did mention him in the Minor Houses promo) for me.

      Quote  Reply

  108. Lina
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    I think mummer’s right…GRRM’s quote was taken out of context and was, as I read it, just a general observation about how D&D have gone about adapting/cutting down the books for TV. I don’t think he was talking about the same specific character that Ran mentioned. I still think it’s Rast.

    But for the fun of theorizing:

    It cannot be Tywin! So many of the political machinations in King’s Landing would get messed up. He’s the only person that can hold back Cersei, and after his death, her pent-up powerlust drives the court intrigue in AFfC, helps shape Jaime into a more honorable person, and brings about her apparent downfall. Further, Tywin’s death is monumental: It’s the moment when Tyrion realizes he doesn’t have to take any more shit from the Lannisters and can go out into the world as his own person!

    Beric – His role COULD be merged with Thoros, but isn’t the whole allure of the BwB the fact that Beric can’t die? Thoros is the one bringing him back to life, right? Thoros can’t bring HIMSELF back to life, can he? (maybe he can…?)

    Hoster – I’d be behind this choice if we hadn’t learned there’s no Riverrun in S1. What’s the point of killing him off if there are no consequences to be seen?

    Theon – No. I don’t think GRRM is done with him yet. I kind of hate him but I can’t help but feel there may be redemption for him somewhere down the road.

    Karstark – Could work. I liked the adapted scenario above (I forget who wrote it, sorry!) about him dying and then his family abandoning when Jaime gets freed. I still think his execution was momentous for Robb (and really likened him to Ned), but I guess they could cut it if they had to, or use someone else.

    LC Mormont – No, doesn’t make sense. They’d need to either make Jon Lord Commander right away, which ruins the reason for his “coming of age” type journey beyond the Wall, or slot in someone else as Lord Commander, which defeats the purpose of cutting Mormont to condense/adapt.

    Balon – Does he die in Book 3, or we’re not really sure when he dies? I just can’t imagine them having the time to even get into anything concerning the Iron Islands in GoT. Unless, MAYBE, at the very end of the series, Robb tells Theon that Balon is dead and sends Theon to treat with one of his uncles. But then Crow Eye needs an early arrival, no? Too much gets messed up, I think.

      Quote  Reply

  109. purplejilly
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Tywin’s Bastard,
    I think ‘minor’ character depends on people’s viewpoints, when wild speculation is running rampant as it is right now : )

      Quote  Reply

  110. Notmy Realname
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    youandwhosearmy,
    Stop suggesting Hoster. He doesn’t appear in the season, and thus cannot die in the season. Killing him offscreen achieves nothing.

    He certainly can. There’s no reason he can’t get an off-screen death. Of course Catelyn would hear about it. And of course, the entire point of killing him off early would be precisely to give him an off-screen death, to streamline the flow of the Riverrun chapters. Catelyn’s already grieving her “dead” sons, nothing really changes. The only subplot Hoster’s important in is what he did to Lysa years and years ago. Which can be much more eloquently exposed by Lysa herself, or Littlefinger. On the other hand, if you leave him in, you’ve got like, five minutes per episode of actual stuff happening, and fifty-five minutes of Cat moping.

      Quote  Reply

  111. shadallion
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who clicks on the comments about a post SPECULATING on who might be killed on a show that hasn’t even premiered (meaning only people who read the books would know the characters anyway) knows that there will be spoilers.

    Let’s not be too silly, please.

      Quote  Reply

  112. purplejilly
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    You know, Lord Beric could die in S.1, but could still die the same way, and still have his magical undead powers, and could just be walking around inspiring followers sooner. We could still wind up with an undead Cat. He could still do all the main story-line important stuff he does in Book 3, just start doing it sooner. And that COULD shorten S.3

      Quote  Reply

  113. Nicole
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    This is an awesome thread. Reading through all these just reminded me how epic GOT really is. My money is on Tully. Catelyn spends too much time with him and it drags on.

      Quote  Reply

  114. youandwhosearmy
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    It actually makes a lot of sense that they’re killing off Lord Karstark early. It echoes Ned’s initial excecution of Will, and of course the other significant beheading as well. It shows Robb taking on the burdens of being a King.

    It also makes much more sense to have Lord Karstark attempt to kill the kingslayer early on, while the memory of his sons’ deaths are still fresh in viewers’ minds. Delaying this would make the whole incident rather disjointed.

    As long as they’re making sensible and thoughtful changes like these, I can’t see them getting into too much trouble.

      Quote  Reply

  115. youandwhosearmy
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    Notmy Realname,

    I see what you’re saying, but I think the potential gain in terms of freeing up screen time down the line would be outweighed by the loss of those extremely personal moments between Cat and her father, and of course Edmure as well. They will want to keep as many of these types of relatable, powerful family moments as possible.

      Quote  Reply

  116. jaybe
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    Martin,

    Theon is still alive at the begining of a Dance With Dragons

      Quote  Reply

  117. Notmy Realname
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    youandwhosearmy,

    Mmm…you do have a point. It could work if they trim it down a bit. Again, if the premise is that a minor character dies earlier, my money’s still on him. I’d have to re-read to see what the deal would be with Karstark, though.

      Quote  Reply

  118. youandwhosearmy
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Notmy Realname,

    It’s not that you couldn’t lose Hoster from a plot perspective: you totally could. He does virtually nothing, anyway. But he’s the focal point of some important and very believable family drama. You get interactions between Cat and Edmure, and an understanding of why Edmure later makes some very rash decisions – he wants to live up to his father. You also get insight into the relationship of Cat and Lysa, and her mysterious secret, and of course the unresolved family conflict with the Blackfish.

    I think the whole point of leaving the Tullys out of S1 is to give their character introductions some breathing space, and Hoster becomes the focal point of all that great stuff about Family, Duty, Honor. It’s too HBO to miss, in my opinion. :)

    On the other hand, killing of Karstark loses you nothing at all, it just moves that plot point forward, potentially making it more immediate and dynamic, and enriching Robb’s arc.

      Quote  Reply

  119. Balerion
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    ..Robb…. ??

      Quote  Reply

  120. Winter Is Coming
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Mike Chair: Your premise challenges the integrity of this post.You claim that it can’t be certain people because the character must be VERY minor.My point is simple.If he is SO minor then why is it an issue at all?If you claim that it shouldn’t be an issue then the fault must lie with Hear Me Roar for putting it up here.WiC.net does not have history of putting up frivolous posts.They deserve the benefit of the doubt.They have the right to defend themselves.I have the right to Always Support the Bottom!

    I have no idea who the character might be and don’t really have the time to speculate about it (we’re kinda busy as you can see!). I just thought it was interesting that GRRM stated that David & Dan have made changes that could bring about the “butterfly effect”. Maybe the death of the particular character mentioned in his recent conference call wasn’t an incident of this, but both statements fall under the same topic of “changes to the original story”.

    Plus it makes for some fun speculation that should help break up the endless fretting over bad reviews.

      Quote  Reply

  121. Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Lord Ned’s Head: Incidentally, since were taling extracution here. What if D&D combined Beric with Ser Hugh? Beric, the dashing knight at the tourney, gets killed by the Mountain Other than that, I’d love to see a Gregor/Beric throwdown after Ned sends men out to get the Mountain

    How are they going to combine 2 Characters that have 2 different actors playing them?

    What are they going to do combine the two actors using a faulty Teleport Device?

      Quote  Reply

  122. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Mormegil,

    Oh my bad then. Didn’t realize there was someone annoucned as Ser Hugh.

    Still,Beric could die by the Mountain in a skirmish.

    As for Beric ressurecting, it would be easy to give Thoros those abilities.

      Quote  Reply

  123. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Funny thought. If it is indeed Beric who dies in S1, then its still possible, by the nature of his character, that he could return depending on the method of his death. Maybe D&D wanted to show a death in S1 in oreder to make his return all the more shocking?

      Quote  Reply

  124. Kana
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Here’s another article on GoT, “Geek girls power viewership for sci-fi/fantasy TV:
    ‘Game of Thrones’ and other manly shows featuring strong women draw female audiences ”

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/42560281/ns/today-entertainment/

      Quote  Reply

  125. mummer
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Mormegil: How are they going to combine 2 Characters that have 2 different actors playing them?
    What are they going to do combine the two actors using a faulty Teleport Device?

    OMG OMG OMG OMG I think you just discovered the real reason that Robb was seen with a wolf’s head after the Red Wedding. He’s not dead!! He just had a teleportation accident, and now he’s hiding in a basement, saying “Help me… please help me“…

      Quote  Reply

  126. Risto
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    Sorry if this has already been posted, but according to Elio, it’s a very minor character and according to him the likes of Beric, Karstark etc. can be ruled out. I bet it’s Rast.

      Quote  Reply

  127. McSherrie
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    mummer,

    *golf clap*

    Well played!

      Quote  Reply

  128. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    mummer,

    rofl mummer. Maybe it was a Westerosi invasion of the body snatchers.

      Quote  Reply

  129. Guybrush Threepwood
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    Something to consider, is this really the type of conversation that Winter himself would stay out of? I think not…

    Does it change our speculation if we extrapolate from this fact that the character likely dies in the first six episodes, becuase WIC knows who it is, and that he cant say for release reasons?

    It makes Rast more likely, Hoster Tully or Tywin less.

      Quote  Reply

  130. Bjorn
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Another character not discussed is
    Sansas drunken knight Dontos (dies in the third novel). Although he is just very briefly in the first novel, one possibility would be that they give him a bigger role in the first series as support for Sansa, kill him off early at the hand of Joffrey and then instead let Littlefinger interact more directly with Sansa in the second series to plant their relationship earlier and make her more dependent on Littlefinger.

    Not saying this is likely, but just cause nobody else mentioned him

      Quote  Reply

  131. mummer
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Guybrush Threepwood,
    Winter just posted a minute ago and said he didn’t know who the character was. And if it’s Rast, I think the wight attack may not be happening till episode 7 anyway.

      Quote  Reply

  132. Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Notmy Realname: … if Hoster Tully is alive while Catelyn is in Riverrun, we’re going to be seeing a lot of “Tansy…”. And it’s pretty skippable.

    I kinda thought that too. He doesn’t really DO anything besides that really. I think HT is dead by the time Robb gets to RR, and we never even see him alive.

      Quote  Reply

  133. Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Beric Dondarrion – my first thought as well.

      Quote  Reply

  134. mummer
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Bjorn,
    The problem with that is, Sansa isn’t on her own and in need of support until after Ned’s arrest. That’s got to be pretty late in the series. And it doesn’t make much sense for Dontos to offer her an escape plan when Ned is still in jail and Sansa still thinks she can convince the Lannisters to save him; so Dontos would have to show up after Ned is dead, i.e. probably in episode 10, and then immediately die. I doubt that they’d try to simplify season 3 by making the end of season 1 insanely busy and incomprehensible.

      Quote  Reply

  135. Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    I thought the “Tasy” stuff is kind of important when it’s revealed that Hoster made Lysa abort Littlefinger’s baby. Sure you could cut that stuff down because a lot of the book was inner monologue by Cat. Dontos doesn’t show up till Joff’s tourney I thought. So that kind of rules him out doesn’t it?

      Quote  Reply

  136. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Winter Is Coming: Plus it makes for some fun speculation that should help break up the endless fretting over bad reviews.

    That’s the way I see this post. Fun speculation.

    purplejilly: Who is it?
    Whodunit?

    We have clues. I’d like to reiterate, add and/or modify a few after reading the excellent posts here.
    The character leaving early:
    (1) is male, (2) dies in third book, (3) is very minor but important enough to warrant being a spoiler if revealed, (4) will/may greatly reduce the size of third season with early death* and (5) will not significantly alter the storyline with early death.

    Some of these are factual and some are opinion. I’d say after establishing (1) and (2) the more likely you meet the remaining 3, the more likely we have our guy.

    *could mean he’s in SoS and/or ACoK. It’s possible story elements would be moved from SoS to ACoK, i.e. the second season.

      Quote  Reply

  137. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    The Tansy stuff might be hugely important later on… but I digress

      Quote  Reply

  138. Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Sorry I meant “Tansy” as in Tansy Tea.

      Quote  Reply

  139. Alex Dothrak
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Lina,

    I think it’s Balon, it could be a good reason for Theon to leave at the end of season 1, and then it would shorten the following seasons, since Theon would not have to deal with Balon. HBO may play it out that Theon is the new Lord Reaper and the iron islands may call a moot after Theon’s “death”, and Crow’s Eye would appear then.

      Quote  Reply

  140. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Alex Dothrak,

    I’ve suspected Balon as well, but seeing the bridge scene come to life is just so juicy tha I’d hate to lose it. Damphair and Balon could be amalgamated but I’d rather not have it happen.

      Quote  Reply

  141. Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    Can’t be Beric. Why would D&D even introduce the character as a featured extra only to immediately kill him off. Would be really sloppy story telling.

    Same with Karstark, why introduce him and then immediately kill him?

    Don’t buy Tywin either. Too central to the story. I keep hearing D&D talking about not wanting to vandalize George’s story and killing Tywin early would definitely do that.

    Gotta agree with a lot of the above posters that it is

    Rast or Hoster

    .

    George doesn’t say that its a character that appears on screen in Season 1, only that he’s killed in Season 1.

    Hoster

    would cut down on an awful lot of time for Season 3 if condensing is their goal. Would also not have a lot of impact on the story at large.

    I think the key here is to look at the cut from a writing standpoint. What effect does killing this character early have on our primary characters?

    Hoster

    plays into a lot of Catelyn’s sadness, but she’s got plenty of that between

    Ned and Bran/Rickon.

      Quote  Reply

  142. DH87
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Josh Parker: I have this sinking feeling in my gut that it’s gonna be Tywin.

    Me, too. The actor may have already made other commitments. We know he’s in eight of the ten eps this year—that may be his first and last hurrah.

      Quote  Reply

  143. DH87
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    I just don’t think most of these suggestions are “big” enough to merit an announcement like this—it has to be a marquee player. Most of these characters won’t have been identified, much less missed, by the viewing public in S1.

      Quote  Reply

  144. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    DH87,

    I really don’t think they would sign someone to a role as big as Tywin’s without committing them to more than one season if neccessary. Also GRRM making mention of it to D&D suggests he did not know about it ahead of time. A change that huge would probably be somehting D&D would need to check through with him. The whole first part of AFFC centers around him. We’d be talking drastic changes here if somehting like what you suggested happened.

      Quote  Reply

  145. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    DH87,

    It doesn’t really seem like it was an “announcement” to me. It seems more like GRRM was just cautiously talking about upcoming likely alterations as he’s done numerous times recently and gave the death of the character as an example.

      Quote  Reply

  146. obsidian
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    purplejilly,

    I don’t know if you’ve read any of the 3 sample chapters from ADWD that GRRM has been rotating on his website ? Over at Westeros, they have all three plus a fourth entitled “Reek” , that makes it very clear that Theon is not dead..I fear for the little fake Arya..

      Quote  Reply

  147. obsidian
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    A-a-ar-gh ! My spoiler tag didn’t take , the edit button didn’t give me th option of adding them ,and I forget how to do it with the keypad..help…

      Quote  Reply

  148. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Changes are going to need to happen for sure. I just hope they are the right kind of changes. From what we’ve heard from alot of critics, D&D managing to keep the adaptation as close as possible to the novels is one of the huge coups of the series. It is imperitive that they continue to do this everywhere possible. We will lose characters. Scenes will be clipped or cut alltogether. Its possible that less viewed locations might also have to go by the wayside. But cutting out major characters is a definite step in the wrong direction.
    Tywin is major. Not only in the scenes he appears in, but in the way that his actions affect what happens to just about every other major character not across the Narrow Sea.

    Rast also seems unlikely because he’s basically an extra. I don’t think GRRM would feel the need to alert D&D about potential issues arising if you kill him early. He’s pretty much interchangable with any of the other Night’swatch .

    Beric on the other hand, stars out pretty small in importance, but becomes a much more prominent character in later books. Anything he does though, isn’t something another character like Thoros couldn’t handle.

    Dunno if I am picking the right horse in this race, but I do think the candidate will be somewhere in the middle when it comes to his influence to the story. He won’t be a named extra, but neither will he be a power player.

      Quote  Reply

  149. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Whaddaya know. Spoiler button was down again, but I worked it out manually. Youcan teach an old aurochs new tricks!

      Quote  Reply

  150. purplejilly
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    Okay, after sneakily googling ’round the Internets, I find that from IMDB – Charles Dance (Tywin) is listed as appearing in the 9th and 10th episode – so probably Tywin is NOT the mystery murder victim.

    Alfie Allen (Theon) is listed in only appearing in two episodes from IMDB – so maybe?

    Has Beric been cast? Hoster? what are their names?

    (enjoying the basically crazy speculation!)

      Quote  Reply

  151. DH87
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    Lord Ned's Head: It doesn’t really seem like it was an “announcement” to me.

    Perhaps you’re right. My scenario would have two major players going down in flames in E10 (the known fatality deserves an Emmy simply for giving 100 interviews and never telegraphing, by even a lifted eyebrow, his demise).

      Quote  Reply

  152. Who Is Jacopo Belbo?
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    okay first of all the interview where GRRM talks about discussing the “butterfly effect” with D&D is from JANUARY. and his quote is him speaking HYPOTHETICALLY … as in i warned them they can’t just axe somebody they think is unimportant because down the line they may end up being important. the “somebody dies in the first season who doesn’t die in the book” is a completely unrelated conversation from just this week. it is NOT connected in anyway to an interview back in January so we cannot assume that this pre-mature death falls under such a “butterfly” effect. not to mention multiple people have posted that GRRM confirmed it is a MINOR character … as in not somebody who becomes important either.

    and further i have to just say anybody who suggested Tywin is just smoking crack or taking the piss. Charles Dance is one of the major actors the show landed and considering they will be losing Sean Bean they are going to need somebody with Dance’s gravitas for season 2. not to mention from a character standpoint Tywin is sort of the replacement for Ned in terms of the role they fill in the power vacuum surrounding the throne. their motivations are different, Tywin wants to stabilize the realm and keep it safe and Ned wants to keep Robert safe. but essentially they are two men cut from the same cloth and when the books lose Ned it is then that Tywin steps in to take a larger role, filling in the space left empty and representing the “solid past” and “serious westeros lord with power” faction.

    basically up until he dies Ned is the character many think “well why didn’t he become King he’d be a hell of a lot better than Robert” and after he is gone that role of “sheesh things would be much better with this guy in charge” guy moves over to Tywin.

    and if you think about it the two aren’t that different in many ways, serious, hard, powerful and competent men. of course the major difference is one clings to his “honour” like some paper armour and the other knows that “honour” doesn’t keep you safe at night or hold a realm together and that sometimes, somebody has to step up and do what is necessary even if that might be cruel or savage. Tywin is like Ned without any delusions about the world being a fair and honourable place (is it any wonder Sansa grew up as idealistic and naive as she did?) and willing to get his hands dirty when neccessary to achieve greater good/goals.

      Quote  Reply

  153. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    purplejilly: Okay, after sneakily googling ’round the Internets, I find that from IMDB – Charles Dance (Tywin) is listed as appearing in the 9th and 10th episode – so probably Tywin is NOT the mystery murder victim.

    PJ, you’re a genius! Can we reverse engineer from imdb to see who has fewer episodes than they should? Probably not. It’s not that up-to-date. They’ve got Kit and Maisie in 2 episodes each.

      Quote  Reply

  154. Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    I haven’t read all the responses here, so forgive me if this has already been speculated or shot down. I like the suggestions of Lord Karstark and Beric. To me, these fit the bill of minor characters, but potentially altering events later on in the story. Just my $.02!

      Quote  Reply

  155. Tywin's Bastard
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    obsidian,

    Spoiler tags are written <b> text </b>

      Quote  Reply

  156. Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    another thought:

    with the creation of the Ros character, maybe they’re going to kill off Shae in Season 1 & have Ros be the whore Tyrion takes to King’s Landing

      Quote  Reply

  157. Tywin's Bastard
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    Mike Chair,

    Probably not entirely easy to reverse engineer that seeing how the fact remains (despite people’s strong efforts to ignore it) that the exact and completely unaltered quote from Ran about the character is ” it’s a VERY minor character”.

      Quote  Reply

  158. Jon
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Guys…guys… It’s quite obviously Colonel Mustard in the Library with the candle-stick.

      Quote  Reply

  159. The Smiling Knight
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?:
    okay first of all the interview where GRRM talks about discussing the “butterfly effect” with D&D is from JANUARY.and his quote is him speaking HYPOTHETICALLY …as in i warned them they can’t just axe somebody they think is unimportant because down the line they may end up being important.the “somebody dies in the first season who doesn’t die in the book” is a completely unrelated conversation from just this week.it is NOT connected in anyway to an interview back in January so we cannot assume that this pre-mature death falls under such a “butterfly” effect.not to mention multiple people have posted that GRRM confirmed it is a MINOR character … as in not somebody who becomes important either.

    and further i have to just say anybody who suggested Tywin is just smoking crack or taking the piss.Charles Dance is one of the major actors the show landed and considering they will be losing Sean Bean they are going to need somebody with Dance’s gravitas for season 2.not to mention from a character standpoint Tywin is sort of the replacement for Ned in terms of the role they fill in the power vacuum surrounding the throne.their motivations are different, Tywin wants to stabilize the realm and keep it safe and Ned wants to keep Robert safe.but essentially they are two men cut from the same cloth and when the books lose Ned it is then that Tywin steps in to take a larger role, filling in the space left empty and representing the “solid past” and “serious westeros lord with power” faction.

    basically up until he dies Ned is the character many think “well why didn’t he become King he’d be a hell of a lot better than Robert” and after he is gone that role of “sheesh things would be much better with this guy in charge” guy moves over to Tywin.

    and if you think about it the two aren’t that different in many ways, serious, hard, powerful and competent men.of course the major difference is one clings to his “honour” like some paper armour and the other knows that “honour” doesn’t keep you safe at night or hold a realm together and that sometimes, somebody has to step up and do what is necessary even if that might be cruel or savage. Tywin is like Ned without any delusions about the world being a fair and honourable place (is it any wonder Sansa grew up as idealistic and naive as she did?) and willing to get his hands dirty when neccessary to achieve greater good/goals.

    Ha! What a load of horse manure. Tywin is the series adolf hitler not someone who cares about stabilizing the realm! Stabilizing the realm?
    By mass murder, rape, torture and war?
    He weakened the realm completely just as the Winter started coming, not to mention something else!

    He cares not one bit about the “realm” but only for his power and Lannisters getting the throne. He sees nothing beyond it.
    No delusions eh?

    Whatever he did backfired or will backfire in the near future and we all know how this uber mensch ended, dont we?

    Did his cruelty help at the end? Was it a better armor than Eddards honor?
    Did it make him shit gold? What did he achieve when he ordered Tysha raped, then convinced Tyrion she was only a whore playing him and even made him do it?

    And i do like him as a character, you know?

    But boy do some people miss things. just wow!

      Quote  Reply

  160. King of the North
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    Not one person here mentioned the other side of the ocean.
    Possibly one of Daenerys Stormborn’s followers?

      Quote  Reply

  161. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    Tywin’s Bastard: it’s a VERY minor character

    Ah, but the rub is the very minor character’s early demise will/might/can have a “butterfly effect” on the series. True, he may not even be listed on imdb. Hmm. Who’s not listed on imdb and fits the profile? Hoster and Beric to name two. Interesting. Veeeery interesting. *stroking nonexistent goatee*

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0944947/fullcredits#cast

      Quote  Reply

  162. obsidian
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    Tywin’s Bastard,

    Thanks for the refresher on the spoiler business…I knew someone had mentioned it somewhere before , but try to find it now. ;)

      Quote  Reply

  163. gendry's hammer
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/04/13/watch-5-new-game-of-thrones-clips-video/

    five new clips….this show is gonna be crazy

    one question tho…where is tyrion’s flip?

      Quote  Reply

  164. Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure this has been asked before, but has anyone complied an ASoIaF body count list broken out by book?

      Quote  Reply

  165. Grujah
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    What about Greatjon Umber?
    He dies in 3rd book, is a male, and is not so minor that his death doesn’t change anything. There is also a good place for him to die, When he draws a sword against Robb and Greywind attacks him, he could die. Though, it would ruin one of the best Robb’s quotes “My father taught me that drawing sword against your liege lord is punishable by death, but I am sure you only meant to cut my meat”

      Quote  Reply

  166. Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    DH87: I just don’t think most of these suggestions are “big” enough to merit an announcement like this—it has to be a marquee player. Most of these characters won’t have been identified, much less missed, by the viewing public in S1.

    What announcement?

    It was just GRRM relating an anacdote in an interview that has since been blown out of proportion.

      Quote  Reply

  167. Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Grujah: What about Greatjon Umber?He dies in 3rd book, is a male, and is not so minor that his death doesn’t change anything. There is also a good place for him to die, When he draws a sword against Robb and Greywind attacks him, he could die. Though, it would ruin one of the best Robb’s quotes “My father taught me that drawing sword against your liege lord is punishable by death, but I am sure you only meant to cut my meat”

    No He doesn’t. He’s alive and Well (well alive anyway).

    His Son dies in ASOS he’s imprisoned by the Freys.

      Quote  Reply

  168. Tywin's Bastard
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Mike Chair,

    I think that someone that has a Butterfly effect wouldn’t be called a very minor character with caps, but that’s of course just my guess. I’d at least say that the latter of your two examples does too much to be considered very minor. The other could be that in terms of what he actually does during the current story, although not in who he is.

      Quote  Reply

  169. Posted April 14, 2011 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Kill them all. Bugger Beric and the Brothers without Banners, heave Hoster, rack off with Rast. The BwB can be a rumour til we need to see them after the wedding, shortening scenes of Aryas journey. Hoster can die off screen relieving us of his deathbed boredom. This would save a reasonable chunk of scenes at the expense of flavour, but then that flavour of destruction and despair could be explored with Brienne later when she’s on Jaime’s quest. I’m not saying there is no BwB, but it could be quite effective to have a wild and half mad Thoros and a few other nameless brothers find the aftermath of the wedding. Let’s face it, they won’t fit everything in, so ask yourself what are you prepared to lose. Oh, and while I’m at it, Craster. Find another way to have a wetnurse and other bub. Save the screentime, save the show.

      Quote  Reply

  170. persephone88
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    My money’s on Karstark. He’s minor enough, and it helps strengthen Robb’s character if he metes out justice against Karstark. Has Hoster even been cast? Can’t believe it’s him, and I think Tywin is WAY too important a role to take out early. I could see them eliminating Beric early for sure, or Rast, or even Marillion. Killing Beric could greatly reduce the Bro W/O Banners storyline, but it could still be worked. I really think it is Karstark though…

      Quote  Reply

  171. Eric
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    Could WinterIsComing please edit this thred? I have thankfully read all the books, but this whole thread is FULL of huge, untagged spoilers. What is the problem everyone? Does there need to be a tutorial about spoiler tags? if you can’t figure out how to use them, DON’T post spoilers.

      Quote  Reply

  172. Posted April 14, 2011 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    paulgude: I’m sure this has been asked before, but has anyone complied an ASoIaF body count list broken out by book?

    There’s one here for the first three books
    http://asoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/topic/47887-list-of-death/

    AGoT 54 Deaths
    ACoK 72 Deaths
    ASoS 97 Deaths

    It doesn’t include people only presumed dead and places the death in the book where it is confirmed (so for example a few of the deaths listed for ASoS are from the Battle of the Blackwater in ACoK)

      Quote  Reply

  173. Mike Chair
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Tywin’s Bastard: I think that someone that has a Butterfly effect wouldn’t be called a very minor character with caps

    I see your point. Perhaps we should redefine the “butterfly effect” element, which is only a concern of GRRM. I give the concern credence in our analysis because I ask, why cut the character early but to save space later? Perhaps we should retool the element so, rather than the character causing a ripple effect to trim the story, he is simply part of a planned pruning that may or may not have a “butterfly effect.”

    Under this analysis we should also consider who appears early in the first book as a minor character that is part of an expendable group later.

    I think it is also valid to consider who is involved in all scenes of violence early in the first book under the hypothesis that D&D simply used an existing scene to dispense with the chap.

      Quote  Reply

  174. Posted April 14, 2011 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    Eric,

    You’d think anybody with common sense would know to stay out of a thread explicitly about the later books if they don’t want spoilers.

      Quote  Reply

  175. Posted April 14, 2011 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Mormegil,

    Thanks for that!

    It’ll be interesting to see how the books and show line up on that score. I’m sure there will be more than one difference.

      Quote  Reply

  176. Josh
    Posted April 14, 2011 at 9:17 pm | Permalink

    Welll the problem with Karstark is that D&D have implied that they plan to extend Rob’s role. Killing Karstark doesn’t do. Plus he isn’t a MAJOR character in the third book….

    If it’s Bedric it would certainly mean they are downplaying the fantasy side of the series.

      Quote  Reply

  177. Posted April 15, 2011 at 9:04 am | Permalink

    I knew it was going to turn out like this… It’s gonna be the watchmen movie all over again, someone who’s just skimmed the books and armed with nothing but a material grasp of the story (grasping none of the complexities) is going to piss all over the story, and we’re going to get to hear how great it is for the next few months…

    (If it’s Roose Bolton they kill off I’m going on protest :P)

    Dragons in Dungeons may or may not be found here

      Quote  Reply

  178. M Vandenberg
    Posted April 16, 2011 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    This might be going too far, but has anyone considered Mance Rayder? If they pared down the length of Jon’s trip beyond the wall it could save a ton of screen time. He fits the criteria of having a minor season 1 role, plus they could probably get away with having the wildlings not have such a charismatic leader. They might even be able to keep the storyline of Jon/Sam taking his son if they explain that he was born before Mance was killed. What do you guys think?

      Quote  Reply

  179. Posted April 18, 2011 at 3:33 am | Permalink

    My current bet is that they are going to off with Grey Wind on S1. This will easy on the CGI costs in later seasons, and Grey Wind is not as important as Ghost, for example. And it is male, after all

      Quote  Reply

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Before commenting, please read our moderation and spoiler policy.
Want an avatar with your comments? Comment using Twitter or Facebook or get a Gravatar.

Some helpful HTML tags. Wrap these tags around the appropriate text:
Add a link: <a href="INSERT-URL-HERE"> </a>
Bold text: <strong> </strong>
Italic text: <em> </em>
Spoiler: <b> </b>

  • Recent Comments

  • Media Updates

    Skull at Craster's Keep Trucks Skull at Mance's camp Wildlings in the snow Joffrey Cersei on bed
  • Tags

  • Archives

    • 2013 (335)
    • 2012 (550)
    • 2011 (512)
    • 2010 (309)
    • 2009 (174)
    • 2008 (47)