// $gooaudioplayer = file_get_contents('http://gameofowns.com/audioplayer.html'); // echo $gooaudioplayer;

Who the heck is Oona Chaplin playing?

Filed Under: Filming, Speculation

Oona ChaplinOona Chaplin was announced as a new cast member for season two of Game of Thrones about one month ago. Since then we’ve been trying to figure out who exactly she will be playing. We were initially given only the character’s first name, Jeyne, which wasn’t much help as there are a couple Jeynes in the book. Which Jeyne is she? Or is she an entirely new character named Jeyne? Despite some further questioning, HBO refused to give a last name but added that the role is a “small” one. This left us even more confused than before. Just who the heck is Oona Chapin playing?

Well recently we have obtained some interesting inside info that may shed some light on just what Oona’s role might be in this second season. Or not. You’ll have to click through to find out, but beware, this post will contain spoilers from books two and three of A Song of Ice and Fire.

So here is what we’ve heard: Robb and “Jeyne” share, at least, two scenes together. These occur during and/or immediately after the Battle of Oxcross, an event that was never shown in the books. In their second scene together, a parting scene, Robb asks Oona’s character for her name and she replies “Lissa” (or possibly Melissa, our source wasn’t sure on this one). When Robb asks what family she is from, she refuses to tell him. When Robb asks where she’s from, she replies, “Volantis.”

Winter Is Coming: To which I say, “whaaaaa???” I now have no idea what character Oona is playing. It’s seems likely she will be a love interest for Robb. But is she supposed to be Jeyne Westerling? If so, why would HBO be playing coy about her last name? And why is she giving out a different name to Robb and saying she is from Volantis of all places? So many questions here. Either way, we’re looking at some interesting changes/additions to the original novel, especially with regard to Robb’s storyline.

Tagged as , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Have you already read all the books and/or don't care about spoilers? You can reveal all the spoilers in the comments with the click of a link below.

157 Comments

  1. Ben Watson
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    O.o

      Quote  Reply

  2. burth
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    I don’t know what to make of it, but I’ll say this: Oona Chaplin is great in “The Hour” and I’ll be glad to see her in whatever role she’s going to end up playing :)

      Quote  Reply

  3. you-know-nothing
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    I do think it’ll be Jeyne Westerling, she isn’t likely to appear until the end of the series anyway so that could be considered a small role???

      Quote  Reply

  4. Posted September 16, 2011 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    Interesting, as several news sites said confidently a week or two after the ‘Jeyne’ thing that she was definitely playing ‘Jeyne Westerling’.

    My guess at this time would be that she actually is playing Jeyne Westerling, but a different version of Jeyne with a foreign accent from her mother who has run away from home or perhaps been captured by Robb’s forces during the battle and is lying about her name (perhaps Westerling forces joined the muster at Oxcross and Jeyne was sent along in the hope of attracting marriage interest from the assembled nobles). Perhaps Robb feels he can have a tryst with her with no problem, believing she is a commoner, but when she is revealed to be a noblewoman, decides he must marry her to satisfy honour. This would add meat to what is a very bare storyline in the books.

      Quote  Reply

  5. Hear Me Roar
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    Nice to finally discuss it, we caught wind of that one some time ago. Really intriguing. It does indeed seem she’s is a version of Jeyne Westerling, but it will be interesting to see how they play it out. As long as the end point of that particular subplot matches the one in the books, all is well. Robb’s story line will be one of the most interesting ones for readers and non-readers alike this season.

      Quote  Reply

  6. OhWhoCares
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    What the flying ffffff?

      Quote  Reply

  7. Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    Considering everything that goes down because of Robb and Jeyne I wouldn’t be too surprised if they are trying to buff up the story from the one in the book. It also probably helps that Robb is a “viewpoint” character in the series, so we aren’t just relying on Catelyn to give us the information.

    Since the produces already said They will die happy if they get to the Red Wedding I can’t see them changing this plot much, not to mention the anger it would receive.

    Although to say she is playing a “small” part, but then to buff the part of Jeyne from the books, well that’s weird.

      Quote  Reply

  8. Steve the Pirate
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    My theory: I’m thinking they’re just making it as if Robb doesn’t know who she is when they meet, and when he does find out that she’s noble, he feels obligated to marry her. And wants to, ’cause hey, she’s gorgeous. This makes Robb a little less to blame for his downfall, because he didn’t know she was a noble woman when hooking up with her.

      Quote  Reply

  9. Ninepenny
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:17 am | Permalink

    Steve the Pirate and Adam Whitehead,

    Sounds plausible and I think it’d work quite well – it’d also explain why they are so coy about the character’s full name. I always thought the Robb/Jeyne thing was a little hard to believe, so I can see why the producers would change it like that (especially if they intend to actually show their relationship on-screen).

      Quote  Reply

  10. Chris
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    Jeyne Westerling sounds about right.
    While her actual role in the story is huge, hers would really be only a very small “part,” with a limited number of lines and scenes, unless it were substantially buffed up. In the books, Jeyne is almost a piece of furniture, a distant character seen from Catelyn’s perspective whose presence messes things up disastrously but who has very little personality of her own. It makes sense that the producers would try to make her relationship with Robb more interesting and complicated.

      Quote  Reply

  11. Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    What the fuck is this?

    Are they pulling an Alan Ball on this show?

    I hope this is sanctioned by GRRM.

      Quote  Reply

  12. Sid
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    Actually, this aint too far-fetched. The Westerlings have some recent ancestors from Essos. Maggy-the-Frog is Jeyne’s great-grandmother, and she could quite possibly have lived in Volantis at some time before emigrating to Westeros and Lannisport.

    Jeyne is then using her family’s history to conjure up a plausible history to Robb, methinks.

      Quote  Reply

  13. clemintine
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    Either way I think they are adding more complications to the story to make Robb/Jeyne’s relationship more of a focus and more dramatic. I have two theories.

    The first is that she isn’t even a Westrosi noblewoman. A merchant’s daughter or a foreign noblewoman. There’s even less political gain there than with a Jeyne Westerling, who at least was part of a nobel and old line, small as it was, which would make his downfall even more tragic.

    Or the twist is that she’s… Jeyne Lannister! (perhaps a daughter of the missing Lannister uncle?)

      Quote  Reply

  14. Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Yeah, I agree with Adam Whitehead. If anything they can say she got her foreign looks from her grandma Maggy the Frog.

    She’s much hotter than Jeyne Westerling was described, but then again, this is television.

      Quote  Reply

  15. Kalasin
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    This is totally confusing and weird. I always assumed she was Jeyne Westerling, but why change that storyline so much if it’s going to be a “small” part of the series? You should only change it if it’s going to be significant somehow.

    I definitely pictured Jeyne as less exotic looking in the books, though.

      Quote  Reply

  16. knowsomething
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    burth,

    I agree. I was really impressed with Chaplin in the last “The Hour” episode I saw her in (episode 5). I don’t mind them mixing things up when it comes to the Robb/Jeyne storyline so long as it ends up in the same place. On the other hand, if they change up the Reeds storyline and replace them with Osha, I’ll be pissed.

      Quote  Reply

  17. Steve the Pirate
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    I wonder if the Reeds’ ages affect the story choice for the show. They are just so young, even Meera’s just a teenager, and Jojen’s a young boy like Bran. It being an HBO, maybe they don’t want to deal with an excess of child actors if they don’t have to. The legalities involved, the issue with them aging visibly between seasons, and the fact that they sure won’t be having those gratuitous sex and nudity scenes that HBO loves. I still think that the Reeds could easily be merged into one character for the show. Save money, time, and make them a teenager.

      Quote  Reply

  18. Jenn
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    I’m with those who believe she will lie about who she is and that’s why Robb becomes entangled with her. Or rather that’s what I hope. It’ll make this storyline more interesting and, honestly, more realistic.

      Quote  Reply

  19. Jackol
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    Isn’t it the case that we find out in AFFC that Jeyne Westerling’s mother basically conspired with Tywin Lannister to set Robb up with Jeyne specifically to screw up Robb’s relationship with the Freys?

    From AFFC Jaime’s last chapter:

    “House Westerling has its pardon, and your brother Rolph has been made Lord of Castamere. What else would you have of us?” “Your lord father promised me worthy marriages for Jeyne and her younger sister. Lords or heirs, he swore to me, not younger sons nor household knights.”

    “I have two sons as well,” Lady Westerling reminded him. “Rollam is with me, but Raynald was a knight and went with the rebels to the Twins. If I had known what was to happen there, I would never have allowed that.” There was a hint of reproach in her voice. “Raynald knew nought of any … of the understanding with your lord father.”

    Or he may be dead. Walder Frey would not have known of the understanding either.

    “No more than I want Joy to marry the son of some scheming turncloak bitch. She deserves better.

    Jaime had to wonder how much Lord Gawen knew about his wife’s scheming.

    Basically, the text says that Lady Westerling was in cahoots with Tywin prior to the Red Wedding. Given the circumstances it doesn’t make sense for Tywin to conspire with Lady Westerling after Jeyne and Robb get married – the damage is done then, there’s no role for Lady Westerling to play in the Red Wedding itself or even getting Robb to go to the Twins, so the conspiring must have been to get Jeyne into Robb’s bed and get Robb to marry Jeyne.

    I think this is reinforced by the fact that the reward for the Westerlings is entirely out of proportion for any act short of orchestrating the Jeyne-Robb match up. Simply going along with Tywin’s plans, or forcing Jeyne to take a course of Tansy Tea is not worth the Castamere lands and title, 2 ‘lords or heirs’ marriages and a wife for the son…

    Given that, it wouldn’t surprise me if they fleshed out the Jeyne-Robb meeting to be much more mysterious/conspiratorial, and I agree with the above speculation that some identity fraud on the part of Jeyne could make this all make a bit more sense.

      Quote  Reply

  20. morbiczer
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    I still think that the Reeds could easily be merged into one character for the show. Save money, time, and make them a teenager.

    I am pretty sure Meera is 16 in the books. If you age her up along all the other young characters, that would make her 18-20 in the series.

    Jojen is several years older in the books than Bran. He could be played by someone 15-16 year old in the series easily.

      Quote  Reply

  21. Epic knows nothing
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    burth:
    I don’t know what to make of it, but I’ll say this: Oona Chaplin is great in “The Hour” and I’ll be glad to see her in whatever role she’s going to end up playing :)

    wooow.. I didn’t know that was her in The Hour! Strong actress!! I will be very surprised if her part is not a noble. I am already surprised she is anything other than Martell.

      Quote  Reply

  22. Blood
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Ninepenny,

    I don’t think there’s anything hard to believe about the Robb/Jeyne thing as written. What would be much harder to believe is Jeyne seeking Robb out in a war zone and giving out false names and claiming to be from Volantis. The only way that makes sense is that it’s part of some greater plan. What plan would that be? Going into new conspiracy theories is not needed there are plenty in the book already.

      Quote  Reply

  23. Steve the Pirate
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    Yeah but they don’t really need two Reeds. Two is more fun, for the interactions, but I would rather see one Reed than none at all. Jojen is only a few years older than Bran, who is six in the books. So say, 10ish. If I had to pick only one Reed, I’d go with Meera at 16, and give her the greensight.

    And Lady Westerling was definitely a schemer. Jeyne’s degree of participation in that has never been clear, but I think she was sort of shoved along without knowing too much what the plan was.

      Quote  Reply

  24. Winter Is Coming
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    Steve the Pirate: And Lady Westerling was definitely a schemer. Jeyne’s degree of participation in that has never been clear, but I think she was sort of shoved along without knowing too much what the plan was.

    Maybe this is D&D’s way of cutting a character then? Get rid of Lady Westerling and just have Jeyne herself be the ambitious, scheming one?

      Quote  Reply

  25. Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    Totally OT

    Wilko Johnson Interview here:-

    http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2011/09/15/interview-guitarist-game-of-thrones-actor-wilko-johnson/

    Has a bit on what it’s like playing Ilyn Payne (and I bet he has no idea yet what a big role Payne has coming up in AFFC

    And if, like me you’re a fan of his music the gig dates for the current tour are posted at the end

      Quote  Reply

  26. Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    wow. that’s intruguing.
    I love the free cities :)

    i’m kinda happy she’s not playing JW, because doesn’t look like JW, IMO. I’m sorry for her though – she’s not getting to kiss Richard Madden after all

      Quote  Reply

  27. Who Is Jacopo Belbo?
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    ahhh. it was bound to happen. with good reviews and response comes hubris … which leads to the show completely going off the rails.

    it was fun while it lasted. i expect season two to be a complete departure from the book and not for the better. many of the changes last season were neutral at best and often worse than the story from the book.

    i pretty much have no confidence in a show that has flat roofed buildings in a super snowy locale, and a mish-mash barbarian tribe with no noticable redeeming qualities that smacks of racism and inept art direction, a set up scene that went heavy on the gore for no apparent reason that defies the shows own internal logic and a show that couldn’t even manage to make dead animals and people look realistic most of the time and then of course there is the sexposition farce and the idiotic character of Roz who wasted at least 30 minutes of screen time.

    it is all down hill from here folks. mark my words. brace for complete FUBAR ness from here on out.

      Quote  Reply

  28. grandmaFunk
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?:
    a set up scene thatwent heavy on the gore for no apparent reason that defies the shows own internal logic

    how did the prologue defy the show’s internal logic?

      Quote  Reply

  29. John
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    And why are you here troll ?

      Quote  Reply

  30. Ser_G
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Seems to me that WiC nailed it: we know that D&D want TRW (which basically means they need Jeyne or a Jeyne equivalent), but we also know that they’re in an enormous horses-vs-stonehenge crunch to keep the cast of characters under control, and so they’re transforming the character of Jeyne and essentially rolling her entire family up into the one character. She will wind up being duplicitous and not who she initially appears to be, which is very likely the reason for the coyness on the part of the producers as to her last name and general identity.

    If true this would to me constitute a legitimate effort to stay true to the core of the story while staying within their budget limits. The details of House Westerling aren’t that important and even Jeyne is a tertiary character at best.

      Quote  Reply

  31. kerning
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    I would hazard a guess that she’s indeed the gal that catches Robb’s eye. Introduced early, but it gives them time to develop a realistic relationship.

    Besides–didn’t HBO or David & Dan say in some season 2 preview that they’re calling it ‘the season of love’?

      Quote  Reply

  32. DawnWielder
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    not to gush but DaMn…

      Quote  Reply

  33. Dan
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    I agree, they may have done the best job I’ve ever seen in staying true to a book but they didn’t even use real dire wolves or real dragons. They even faked the death of Ned Stark. Sean Bean isn’t really dead and that makes that whole scene just a lie and ruined the emotional reaction I had when Ned Stark died for real in the book. If I find out the sex scenes weren’t real then I’ll be done with this show.

      Quote  Reply

  34. Idaan
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:21 pm | Permalink

    clemintine,

    clemintine:
    The first is that she isn’t even a Westrosi noblewoman. A merchant’s daughter or a foreign noblewoman. There’s even less political gain there than with a Jeyne Westerling, who at least was part of a nobel and old line, small as it was, which would make his downfall even more tragic.

    Well, that’s already true, after a fashion. The Spicers (Jeyne Westerling’s mother’s family) are an upjumped progeny of a spice merchant and “Maggy the Frog” who was a foreign beauty, and her status was close to nobility. I like the idea that Jeyne lies to Robb about her noble status in fear of being taken hostage.

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?:
    it was fun while it lasted.i expect season two to be a complete departure from the book and not for the better.many of the changes last season were neutral at best and often worse than the story from the book.

    Yeah, which is exactly why they’re casting completely minor characters that a casual viewer won’t probably even notice and only fans will appreciate. Hell, in the five years after reading AFFC I had problems remembering who Tickler or Black Lorren were.

      Quote  Reply

  35. Joshua Taylor
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:30 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    Bye! Don’t let the door hit you on the way out!

      Quote  Reply

  36. HandmaidenofDany
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    I am certaintly all for changing/adding characters and events for the show as long as the general plot line is followed. I am rather excited to see the changes actually! Thinning down the amount of characters is absolutely neccessary for the transition to television. Also, expanding some of the major characters stories will flesh them out and give us a chance to see things that we didn’t in the books.

    *jumping up and down in excitment*

      Quote  Reply

  37. Delta1212
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    Seriously, that stag Tywin was gutting had to be one of the fakest looking props I’ve ever seen.

      Quote  Reply

  38. Joshua Taylor
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    Delta1212,

    Too bad it was actually real.

      Quote  Reply

  39. Lex
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    Winter Is Coming: Maybe this is D&D’s way of cutting a character then? Get rid of Lady Westerling and just have Jeyne herself be the ambitious, scheming one?

    That would be awful. I really, really hope they don’t make Jeyne a schemer.

      Quote  Reply

  40. Who Is Jacopo Belbo?
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    grandmaFunk,

    because once you dismember the corpses of the wildings they A. make crappy wights being like dismembered and all and B. it doesn’t make any sense why you would go back and “make sure” the wildings were dead and how they died if they were slaughtered and dismembered not to mention you wouldn’t have the guy who witnessed it initially come back and find them missing and him simply go “hmm, well that is a bit odd”.

    the whole “we need to go make sure they are dead and find out what exactly happened” only makes sense if, like in the book, the wildings are found simply dead as they last were … frozen in place … because then did the scout really see them dead, how long did he really see if they were dead, could he have been mistaken … etc. them being slaughtered, dismembered and put into an occult pattern was just idiotic.

    and for all of you knee jerk, slam any criticism no matter how valid fan bois can suck it … i’ve been here longer than almost all of you and while enjoyed the show overall there was a lot of stuff that sucked in the show …. very little to argue with on that point. most of what sucked had to do with changes that did not improve the story for tv medium but were just changes that did nothing or usually made the story worse (the hound’s story coming from littlefinger?). the other major source of stupid-suckassitude was from the art direction in many cases. no place with heavy snowfall has flat roofs. when they used “fake” dead animals and people they looked terrible, the one time they used a real dead dear it looked good. the Dothraki were a zeus damned mess of titanic proportions. a box of snakes as a gift? a hodgepodge inconsistent mix of actor races? a terrible mish-mash of pantomime cultural cliches? a horse riding princess in a skirt (and a burlap hatler?). a culture that is never shown for its positive qualities that in the book make Dany fall in love with the people and want to be their Khalessi? a drunk one armed monkey could have done a better job with the Dothraki than this show did.

    and the books are only getting more and more convoluted and crappy themselves so it is hardly a surprise that the moderate incompetence of the TV show crew added to the growing unintelligbility of the story line from the books is only going to make the show get inevitably worse and worse.

    not that any of your more kool-aid drinking fanbots would ever actually admit to any shortcomings in the show … that is how mindless droogies roll i guess.

      Quote  Reply

  41. daveb
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    John: Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    And why are you here troll ?

    Love him or hate him, WIJB is no troll.

      Quote  Reply

  42. John
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    Okay, are you done trolling or you just want to keep making an ass out of yourself ?

      Quote  Reply

  43. purplejilly
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Steve the Pirate,

    Makes perfect sense!!

      Quote  Reply

  44. Epic knows nothing
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    John,

    Actually Who Is (John Galt) has been around for a long time, which is why his statements are hitting much harder than if a new person would have decided to declare these things. At least to me.

      Quote  Reply

  45. Dekar
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    …What the heck is HBO doing? They must have created four new characters by now. Doesn’t ASoIaF have enough characters for them? C’mon… I just hope they didn’t get carried away with first season’s success and blow this up.

      Quote  Reply

  46. Epic knows nothing
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    purplejilly,

    That does kind of make sense, as if HBO is keeping the last name to prevent spoiling the story. It would have worked better if we didn’t already assume she was JW weeks ago.

      Quote  Reply

  47. purplejilly
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,
    Wow – WIJB got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! But that burlap halter criticism is spot on. It looks like some sort of ugly ‘challenge round’ design from Project Runway. Tim Gunn would be aghast at how they dressed her. LOL

      Quote  Reply

  48. BrosBeforeSnows
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    According to GRRM, the Battle of the Blackwater (an episode which he himself is writing) will be episode #9 this season. If so, that means the Red Wedding won’t take place until season 3. So, if she really is playing Jeyne Westerling, it could be to set up the story between her and Robb, since we aren’t introduced to her character in the books until she’s seen through Cat’s eyes when Robb brings her back to Riverrun. The producers probably want to keep Robb on camera this season, rather than have other characters merely talk of his exploits, like they do in the books. So in that case, they’re going to need a scene or two in which Jeyne first meets Robb, and provide context as to why Robb would’ve broken his vows with the Freys.

      Quote  Reply

  49. Charles
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    Adam Whitehead:
    Interesting, as several news sites said confidently a week or two after the ‘Jeyne’ thing that she was definitely playing ‘Jeyne Westerling’.

    My guess at this time would be that she actually is playing Jeyne Westerling, but a different version of Jeyne with a foreign accent from her mother who has run away from home or perhaps been captured by Robb’s forces during the battle and is lying about her name (perhaps Westerling forces joined the muster at Oxcross and Jeyne was sent along in the hope of attracting marriage interest from the assembled nobles). Perhaps Robb feels he can have a tryst with her with no problem, believing she is a commoner, but when she is revealed to be a noblewoman, decides he must marry her to satisfy honour. This would add meat to what is a very bare storyline in the books.

    I think it woudn’t matter to robb her birth. If he had slept with a commoner, he’s marry her all the same.

      Quote  Reply

  50. Epic knows nothing
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    During the airing of season 1, I had severely bad reaction to the show. Since then, the show is more like a phenomenon to me. Eventually I learned to laugh at how bad the show is, and tolerate (and, I guess, respect) the many many people (some actually smart people) who think the show is amazing. I stopped trying to convince anyone of the truth since the truth eventually unwraps itself to those who are looking. I was so embroiled with the show that I in a strange way love it still. Especially once I lowered the bar from ground-breaking cod-medieval (to quote our new friend Will Self) drama based on a cool book down to: poorly written and inadequately paced late night fantasy tv-ma (except the episode written by GRRM: For some reason, I loved that episode). That’s all I gotta to say about that. tv is like a box of chocolates.

      Quote  Reply

  51. Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Oona retweeted a tweet from Jeyne Westerling on twitter. I’m not sure why should even recognize the character if not for that.

      Quote  Reply

  52. oktopous
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    silly troll

      Quote  Reply

  53. Elan
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    I really don’t care how long you’ve been around this blog — if all you’re doing is insulting people and complaining about how everything about the show is horrible, then you are acting as a troll. This is — believe it or not — a site for fans of the books and the series. That doesn’t mean that there’s no place for criticism, but it does mean that you should have some perspective about the things in the show that piss you off. It may be hard for you to accept that most people don’t care at all about things like inappropriate wildling dismemberment, but that doesn’t make it okay for you to accuse people who disagree with you of being “mindless droogies.”

    Really, do you think you’re contributing to the conversation when you warn that the whole show is heading downhill from here? Do you imagine that you’re protecting people from being disappointed later? Because speaking as someone who (like you) has enjoyed the show overall, I’m planning on approaching future seasons with an open mind and an eagerness to be entertained. If you prefer to approach it looking for reasons to be disappointed, that’s fine by me — it’s just annoying to hear about it.

      Quote  Reply

  54. Posted September 16, 2011 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    Adam Whitehead,

    I´m no good to speculate so I’m glad you have thought about it and I only have to read and agree with you.

    And thanks to you too:

    Ninepenny: it’d also explain why they are so coy about the character’s full name.

    Not to think, not to work … you make my life much easier.

      Quote  Reply

  55. HonestJerk
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    They had to show the Robb/Jeyne romance on air.  Jeyne has to be “the pursuer” in the relationship.  

    They don’t want to add another castle to the ridiculous number of locations in ACoK, so Jeyne meeting Robb in the field makes sense.

    Having said that, I’m not found of the choice for actress (good actor, but bland looking IMHO) and this Jeyne no last name from Voltanis storyline sounds moronic.

    The producers made a good show, but f-ed some things up last year: sexposition. 

    This sounds like more screw ups are ahead.

      Quote  Reply

  56. Winterdark
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    I don’t like this at all. If they wanted Oona Chaplin so bad they should’ve made her a Martell.(I assume they appear this season) Jeyne Wetserling is perfect the way she is in the books. They shouldn’t turn her into someone else. I don’t get why D&D want to make up so much stuff this season. First Alton Lannister, then Kovarro and now Jeyne but not Westerling? Add to that, that they’ve added the Jaime storyline from ASoS and show some of Robb we didn’t see in the book. There are allready more characters and scenes in ACoK than you can ever put in 10 episodes. Why add more of your own? Doesn’t that make it even harder?

      Quote  Reply

  57. Dekar
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    Dan:
    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    I agree, they may have done the best job I’ve ever seen in staying true to a book but they didn’t even use real dire wolves or real dragons. They even faked the death of Ned Stark. Sean Bean isn’t really dead and that makes that whole scene just a lie and ruined the emotional reaction I had when Ned Stark died for real in the book. If I find out the sex scenes weren’t real then I’ll be done with this show.

    I laughed. A lot XD

      Quote  Reply

  58. Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Ser_G:
    Seems to me that WiC nailed it: we know that D&D want TRW (which basically means they need Jeyne or a Jeyne equivalent), but we also know that they’re in an enormous horses-vs-stonehenge crunch to keep the cast of characters under control, and so they’re transforming the character of Jeyne and essentially rolling her entire family up into the one character.She will wind up being duplicitous and not who she initially appears to be, which is very likely the reason for the coyness on the part of the producers as to her last name and general identity.

    If true this would to me constitute a legitimate effort to stay true to the core of the story while staying within their budget limits.The details of House Westerling aren’t that important and even Jeyne is a tertiary character at best.

    No no no no no, please no! That would be awful imho.

    RW wouldn’t be the same if they cut down the evil intrigues on one single person. Moreover, this person then being Jeyne? No please, just no.

    Among other things, RW is so awfully dramatic because there is a young and naive couple, hoping to maintain a piece of honest romance throughout a more than nasty game of thrones, which is full of policy, tactics, responsibility and compromises.
    Admittedly, we don’t know exactly if or to which extend Jeyne was involved in her family’s intrigues but to me she was definitely rather innocent and honestly in love with Robb. She’s been as much affected by the whole event as Robb was. A whole couple was betrayed, not only Robb. Jeyne’s own family killed her husband; her own family betrayed her. This is a completely different face of the Westerling family than if it was the case with Jeyne being involved. RW destroyed and punished the naive hopes of a young couple and not just a fatal mistake of a young leader falling in love.

      Quote  Reply

  59. OhWhoCares
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    morbiczer,
    Exactly. When meera appears, she is the same age as jon & robb, if she was aged with them she’d be about 19. That makes the age difference between her and bran in the show the same as in the book. She could easily be portrayed by a 20-24 y/o actress.

      Quote  Reply

  60. John
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Winterdark:
    I don’t like this at all. If they wanted Oona Chaplin so bad they should’ve made her a Martell.(I assume they appear this season) Jeyne Wetserling is perfect the way she is in the books. They shouldn’t turn her into someone else. I don’t get why D&D want to make up so much stuff this season. First Alton Lannister, then Kovarro and now Jeyne but not Westerling?Add to that, that they’ve added the Jaime storyline from ASoS and show some of Robb we didn’t see in the book. There are allready more characters and scenes in ACoK than you can ever put in 10 episodes. Why add more of your own? Doesn’t that make it even harder?

    What’s the big deal with Alton and Kovarro anyway ,it’s not like they are important to the plot so i don’t see why you guys make such a big deal out of it

      Quote  Reply

  61. HandmaidenofDany
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    House of B!tching today….

      Quote  Reply

  62. Wolfheart
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:22 pm | Permalink

    Season two is when David and Dan start deverging from the book series further. Sad thing is I wonder how long fans can stand the producers wanting to beat their own path as seasons go on, for the sake of simplifying?

      Quote  Reply

  63. BrosBeforeSnows
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    I propose that ‘A Clash of Kings’ should no longer be abbreviated as ACoK. I just call it ‘Clash’. AGoT, ASoS, AFfC, and ADwD are all ok. But ACoK seems to stick out (pun intended).

      Quote  Reply

  64. OhWhoCares
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Steve the Pirate,

    Actually, just to clarify, Bran is 7 in GoT and by the time he meets the Reeds he has had his 9th name day. So I always pictured Jojen 12/13. That makes Jojen 3/4 years older than Bran, and Meera 7 years older. Bran is 10 in s1, if we assume the same time progression as in the books he will be 12 when he meets the Reeds, which will make them 15/16 and 19. They could use adult actors for both roles, though I think merging them into one (Meera) is feasible

      Quote  Reply

  65. Aldaris
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Elan,

    Well said.

      Quote  Reply

  66. grandmaFunk
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?: blah blah blah

    Some of your criticism may have been valid but I stopped caring when you couldn’t make your points without resorting to preemptively insulting anyone who would eventually disagree with you.

      Quote  Reply

  67. Steve Hugh Westenra
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Much like that initial “o.0″ post, as well as Winter’s own post, I’m kind of just feeling, “Whaaaaaah???” I have no idea what this means (although several of the theories do seem plausible).
    I’m not sure how I feel about it exactly. It’s all too weird to evoke feelings, I guess, haha.
    Robb and Jeyne are a bit bland in the books, so I can understand that D&D might want to flesh them out. On the other hand, because I find them bland and boring I’m not sure I want them to bother, if that makes sense? Richard Madden does a good job in the show, don’t get me wrong, but I just never found Robb as multifaceted a character as many of the others.

      Quote  Reply

  68. Steve Hugh Westenra
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    BrosBeforeSnows,

    Ahahaha. I never noticed that until you pointed it out but it makes life so much better now that you have. ;)

      Quote  Reply

  69. Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    HandmaidenofDany:
    House of B!tching today….

    ITA. really, people are just over reacting. D&D are DEFINITIVELY going to diverge from the books, sooner rather than later. Why don’t we all wait to see how the show is going to be before we start bitching?
    Also, my world is not going to end because of Alton Lannister, Jeyne-from-Volantris, and some Dothraki dude i don’t give a crap about being killed in season one instead than surviving til season six. If they’ll need him, they can just replace him with another random Dothraki dude I’m not going to care about either, and we can all live happily

      Quote  Reply

  70. Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Two thoughts:

    1. I hope they don’t omit Sybill Spicer and push her ambitions onto Jeyne’s character. That ruins Jeyne as a character, in my opinion. The greatest thing about the Robb and Jeyne storyline is that they really did love each other, even if it was only “teenage love.” The Red Wedding is doubly tragic when you realize that Jeyne was just a young girl, in love with a young boy, without any notion of what was going on above both their heads. The Red Wedding is so sad because it is the violent, terrible, evil consequence of something very innocent and pure. :(

    2. PLEASE DON’T AGE THE REEDS. NO. No no no no. I’ve spoken about this in other threads, but I am vehemently opposed to the Reed(s) showing up as 18-year-old(s) or teenagers who look old or older people who look young. Bran doesn’t need a chaperone. He doesn’t need an Osha to warn him about dangers. He doesn’t need another Hodor to carry him around. He needs someone to tell him stories and keep him interested and help him pass his time. He needs CHILDREN – COMPANIONS who are growing and coming of age right beside him. Bran’s story is a coming-of-age tale, and that’s what’s so fantastic about it. They have little adventures and believe in magic and catch frogs and stuff. They’re children! Stand By Me in Westeros.

    Think of any coming-of-age story you know and imagine how it would go if it were just the protagonist and adults. How would it go? Terribly, that’s how. The kid WOULDN’T come of age. He’d just end up one of those kids who always sits at the adults table and can’t make friends in school and likes to talk about obscure scholarly things. That’s not our Bran.

    I don’t want them combined either, but that might be too much to ask. I think both Meera and Jojen are valuable roles, but if we have to do a Sophie’s choice, I’d say Meera has more to bring to the table. Though I hope they keep her more Meera with greensight than Jojen with a frog net.

      Quote  Reply

  71. Jackol
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Jeyne’s own family killed her husband; her own family betrayed her. This is a completely different face of the Westerling family than if it was the case with Jeyne being involved. RW destroyed and punished the naive hopes of a young couple and not just a fatal mistake of a young leader falling in love.

    To be fair to the Westerling family, no one involved in the original conspiracy to get Robb to marry Jeyne would have foreseen or even hoped for a RW outcome.

    That includes Tywin, who was driving the whole thing. He had no way of knowing what the Freys would do once they stormed off – I’m sure his original plans only went so far as to split the Freys from the Northerners and deny them access to the crossing at the Twins.

    The fact that Walder Frey reacted so badly to overtures from Robb opened the door for the RW, and in my opinion Walder Frey probably suggested the RW scenario to Tywin – I don’t think Tywin was in a position to propose something as outrageous as the RW; for all Tywin knew such a proposal could have pushed the Freys back into the arms of the Starks.

    ie back before the Robb-Jeyne thing got going, Tywin Lannister would not have known or conceived of the RW, which certainly rules out any of the Westerlings being in on it. That’s supported by what Lady Westerling said to Jaime:

    “I have two sons as well,” Lady Westerling reminded him. “Rollam is with me, but Raynald was a knight and went with the rebels to the Twins. If I had known what was to happen there, I would never have allowed that.” There was a hint of reproach in her voice. “Raynald knew nought of any … of the understanding with your lord father.”

    The Westerlings may have been duplicitous turncloaks with respect to Robb and Jeyne (with Jeyne having an unknown amount of knowledge about the plan), but they were all innocent of calculatedly inflicting the RW on Robb and co.

      Quote  Reply

  72. HonestJerk
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Season 1 wasn’t perfect… Good, wry good at times, but no one claims it’s one of the best shows ever.

    The critics are always most impressed with the narrative which comes from Martin. There was good acting, good directing, art direction, etc… But the story is the thing.

    I don’t think Martin’s work is flawless, but f you’re going to make changes it should be to fix his flaws… Not create more!!!

    Martin’s books have moments that “tell, but dont show” aka most of Robb’s exploits in Clash are told from one person to another. We dont “see” them, we are told about them.

    The TV adaption has to show them. To make room for these scenes, the producers appear to have cut the Tullys. Painful as that is me as a reader; I understand and think it’s the right move.

    But changing the Jeyne storyline this much?!?

    Cutting the Reeds?!?!

    These are stupid ideas. Dumb moves that without context seem right up there with Littlefinger sex monologues! Any moron could think “these dogs can’t be trained, but since they’re important to the story we should just edit in a few shots of direwolves sitting on the floor so viewers remember them, and realize wolves are still here” but our producers weren’t even smart enough to do that!!!

    Seven Hells!

      Quote  Reply

  73. knowsomething
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Winterdark,

    You know, I’m really sick of the veiled racist statements here. Give me a effin’ break. Do you really think that Oona Chaplin is some kind of exotic, foreign beauty who can only be a Martell because those are the only characters that can vaguely be ethnic in Martin’s universe? That she couldn’t possibly play someone of noble birth? Are you serious? Chaplin is white with some Latin background, and there is nothing wrong with that. Chaplin plays the daughter of lily white Lord and Lady in “The Hour” and is paler than probably any other person in that series. And now I’m getting mad at myself for defending Chaplin in that way. Ugh. Just stop it, please.

      Quote  Reply

  74. John-Michael Lelievre
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Delta1212: Seriously, that stag Tywin was gutting had to be one of the fakest looking props I’ve ever seen.

    LMAO! That made my day!

      Quote  Reply

  75. penguin9jl
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Not Today,

    I’m usually just a lurker here, but your comment moved me to post. I completely agree, and I also think Robb finding comfort with Jeyne after learning of Bran & Rickon’s death was an especially poignant part of the books. I’d hate to see Jeyne twisted into a devious schemer.

      Quote  Reply

  76. Kevin
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    I believe this character is going to be used to help Robb in his quest to “Make the Seven” before ASOS.

      Quote  Reply

  77. tek
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    knowsomething,

    Dude,

    First of all, Martells ARE nobles, second, I dont think anyone here said she “couldnt be noble”. They definitely didnt say anything to the likes of “her race makes her not qualified for a noble role”. As a matter of fact, I think there have been multiple sentiments that the think she SHOULD be a noble. Too lazy to grab the quotes, but they are there.

    Please dont drag race into this board. We have been just fine without it here.

    Thanks

      Quote  Reply

  78. OhWhoCares
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Lina: He needs CHILDREN – COMPANIONS who are growing and coming of age right beside him

    See, but Meera IS of age. She’s 16. That makes her a ‘woman grown’ in Westeros. So she’s not a child in the book either.

      Quote  Reply

  79. planetex
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    It’s a setup for Jeyne Westerling. Why? People who watch the show with no idea of the background in the books and no knowledge of medieval behaviour (Chivalry) won’t understand why Robb would forsake his alliance with the Freys for a short romance with a character we (the viewer) never met before)

    People who only watch the show need a real reason why Robb would risk all. And this could be done with an enhanced appearance of Jeyne Westerling…. a minor role in Season 2, but a big one in Season 3. It’s all about spelling it out for the audience. Like they did with Yara/Asha/Osha.

    I can understand this…. but I don’t really like it.

      Quote  Reply

  80. Nimble Dick
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    IDEA

    MAJOR SPOLIER

    could she be the second Jayne at Riverrun. Not the one that ran away with blackfish and married Robb and is carrying his child. NOO she is the one that Jamie sees when he takes over Riverrun

      Quote  Reply

  81. clemintine
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Epic knows nothing: Actually Who Is (John Galt) has been around for a long time, which is why his statements are hitting much harder than if a new person would have decided to declare these things.

    Just because he has been a troll around here for a while doesn’t make him not a troll.

      Quote  Reply

  82. Shadowcat85
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    Well if she is indeed “Jeyne W” I guess she’ll be a small role this season and bigger in the third. WiC, is she finished with her filming?

      Quote  Reply

  83. Amy Frey
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    Ben Watson:
    O.o

    Agreed. :-D

      Quote  Reply

  84. HandmaidenofDany
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    I refuse to believe that this will turn into “Legend of the Seeker”.

      Quote  Reply

  85. Lala
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    I also think that they’re changing the part that he’s marrying her because they had sex, and making it into marrying her because she’s ‘noble’ and they had sex. I mean… Robb’s a virgin in the book, but probably less so in the show. (Jon’s a virgin and it’s weird to everyone, so why would ROBB be a virgin?)

      Quote  Reply

  86. Nagga's Kin
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Volantis? Really? Sounds like a boner pill – or a company that makes them.

      Quote  Reply

  87. HandmaidenofDany
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    Also seems weird that HBO would say she is playing a “small part” if she is JW and they are fleshing out the relationship with Robb.

      Quote  Reply

  88. moqorro
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Please HBO, No “Red Wedding”
    Robb is my favourite character!

      Quote  Reply

  89. Lala
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    And I agree that it would be AWFUL if they made Jeyne evil. Please, no. Poor Jeyne. :( It would make Robb look like a d*mbass.

      Quote  Reply

  90. Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    OhWhoCares: See, but Meera IS of age. She’s 16. That makes her a ‘woman grown’ in Westeros. So she’s not a child in the book either.

    That’s a “legal” approach. Okay, so by Westerosi common law she’s a woman grown. She can be married and what not. But in reality? She’s still a child – she takes on a maternal role of sorts while traveling, but she’s still just a girl, with a wild type of innocence. That’s my reading anyway.

    By “coming of age” I didn’t mean “of age” in the legal sense. I meant maturing and discovering oneself and realizing that the world isn’t how children perceive it to be. There’s no set age for this to happen, so it’s unfair to say that just because Meera is 16 she’s already come to age.

      Quote  Reply

  91. Epic the Balls
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    knowsomething: Chaplin is white with some Latin background

    there’s no such thing as an ethnic latin background. By assuming there is you have revealed your veiled racism. :D

    Hihi. Is this thread going to turn to mush now? Is it really so evil to think this hispanic babe would totally do well as a Martell?

    Edit: just remembered i don’t care. sorry to contribute to this madness.

      Quote  Reply

  92. john
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    I hope she will be naked in some scenes!

      Quote  Reply

  93. Winterdark
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    knowsomething,

    Calm down please!

    First of all: I’m pro immigration, pro ethnic diversity and my favorite film is American History X so I think I’m not really much of a racist.

    Second: Someone here said she would play a Jeyne with a foreign accent so I assumed Oona has a bit of an accent. Also she does look kinda Latin to me and Jeyne Westerling is caucasian, at least that’s how I pictured her. And as tek pointed out the Martell’s are nobles and some of the ladies are very beautiful and intelligent. I just don’t think they should’ve changed Jeyne that much.

      Quote  Reply

  94. loco73
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:49 pm | Permalink
  95. darquemode
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    I think some people are over thinking this. Jeyne being part of a plot to discredit Robb is not mutually exclusive with her being innocent and in love with Robb.

    She could easily be an unknowing pawn pushed into positions by some other hand (or former Hand) and fall for Robb sincerely and deeply.

    Having her nurse Robb when he gets injured is no different than in the books although they may move the battle in which he gets injured up to flesh out Robb’s Season 2 part. The location may be changed, the timing may be changed, they may change her name even, but the circumstance of their meeting and how they grow to love one another will be the same basically.

    I not only support adding some meat to Jeyne’s character, I think it is needed.

      Quote  Reply

  96. loco73
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    Winterdark,

    She looks kinda Latin because her father is from Chile and she was born and raised in Madrid, Spain.

      Quote  Reply

  97. Nikki
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    I can’t picture Oona as Jeyne Westerling…however, if she is:

    Perhaps Jeyne gives Robb a false name for fear that he will imprison her if he finds the truth of her family’s historical alliances.

      Quote  Reply

  98. Assunta
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Dan: Dan
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 12:15 pm | Permalink
    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,
    I agree, they may have done the best job I’ve ever seen in staying true to a book but they didn’t even use real dire wolves or real dragons. They even faked the death of Ned Stark. Sean Bean isn’t really dead and that makes that whole scene just a lie and ruined the emotional reaction I had when Ned Stark died for real in the book. If I find out the sex scenes weren’t real then I’ll be done with this show.

    Thanks, Dan. I just sprayed Diet Coke out my nose.

      Quote  Reply

  99. Bronze Yohn Royce
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    Dan, that may be the funniest comment I’ve ever read on this site!

      Quote  Reply

  100. E
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    I’m down with them getting creative about Jeyne Westerling. Welcome, Oona and your Maggy-the-Frog backstory front and centre!

      Quote  Reply

  101. Apsalar
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    A while back there was some speculation that Jeyne W may become a Lannister to reinforce the Lannister connection for non- readers. Could this be why they are not announcing which Jeyne? Explains why she would not want Robb to know who she really is the first time they meet. Also beefs up the Romeo and Juliet aspect. Nice reveal for the audience – Robb is in love with a Lannister!

      Quote  Reply

  102. Epic The Balls
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 5:36 pm | Permalink

    Apsalar,

    The Westerlings are loyal to House Lannister, so that emphasis is in line with the original.

      Quote  Reply

  103. Posted September 16, 2011 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Hmm i’m real curious about how this is going to turn out. A lot of things that are said in this thread make sense. What also complicates things is that Robb is aged up, you can’t really make him as naive as book Robb. Adding to that the RW is probably going to be even more traumatic because TV Robb will be a much more fleshed out and relatable character. Personally I don’t buy the ‘ooh i’m a commoner, and now i’m not marry me’ scenario. That would be a touch to douchy. And making Jane especially schemy and evil, i don’t think that would work (after the RW I think the direct blame should be with the Freys, later trickling down to add to the Lanister hate, there’s just emotionally no room for Jeyne hate imho)

      Quote  Reply

  104. clemintine
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Winterdark: First of all: I’m pro immigration, pro ethnic diversity and my favorite film is American History X so I think I’m not really much of a racist.

    Second: Someone here said she would play a Jeyne with a foreign accent so I assumed Oona has a bit of an accent. Also she does look kinda Latin to me and Jeyne Westerling is caucasian, at least that’s how I pictured her. And as tek pointed out the Martell’s are nobles and some of the ladies are very beautiful and intelligent. I just don’t think they should’ve changed Jeyne that much.

    To be a racist and say racist things are different. Because you seem to be generally an open-minded person doesn’t make you immune to making hurtful actions, or saying something racist. Everyone needs a privilege check now and again.

    And I pictured Tywin with mutton-chops, Dany with purple eyes, and Joreh as really ugly and hairy, not that I cared once I saw the final product. Though I still hold a candle for eyebrow-gate.

    Besides which, I don’t think every single noble in Westeros north of Dorne is lily-white. They don’t sit in their castles and twiddle their thumbs all day. They move around, go on adventures, explore, some of them see the world, go on ships, and marry people from other nations. Or nobles of other nations come to Westeros to visit, and perhaps remain and marry there. Though this doesn’t happen in the books (and given he’s being tortured in a dungeon at the moment, so it probably won’t happen) but parallel-universe Jalabhar Xho could have married a Westeros woman and had children, just as there might be other exiled nobles and royalty who might have married into Westerosi aristocracy. Or in the Westerlings’ case, ambitious foreign merchants married up.

    What I’m intrigued by is how she said she’s from Voltanis and speaks with an accent. Are they making Jeyne actually from Voltanis now, or is this a lie she tells Robb when she’s really a Westerling and the accent is false (perhaps learned from staying there for some time as a child)? Perhaps a later time he encounters her again and now her accent’s British and she’s unveiled as a Westrosi. I hope for the later, then not much of the book is changed. And I hope they keep her innocent, teenager-in-love Jeyne or else RW won’t have the same tragedy to it.

      Quote  Reply

  105. Epic The Balls
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    My theory is that fifteen years from now Arya Stark went through a time portal back to the past to save her brother Robb Stark from making a terrible mistake and ruining his life.

    With the help of Professor Yeromelou, Arya finds herself a “woman grown” during a pivotal moment of her brother’s life. She names herself Lissa McStark and infiltrates the Stark camp. There, she must boost her brother’s confidence and set him up with her future sister-in-law or else Biff Lannister will win.

      Quote  Reply

  106. Kana
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 6:36 pm | Permalink

    Well, if it’s after the battle of Oxcross, that’ll be a logical time to introduce Jeyne Westerling. And seeing as how Robb’s a marauder in her lands, it wouldn’t be too shocking for her family to try to hide her identity.

    I do hope though that they’re not trying to turn her all mysterious. It worked with Shae the Funny Whore, because without Tyrion’s PoV thinking how great she is there’s no reason to see stupid-Shae and Tyrion together at all. Jeyne on the other hand needs to be pretty naive, so she doesn’t fully realize the consequences of marrying Robb, or about her mother’s plotting.

      Quote  Reply

  107. The White Bullshit
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 6:39 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?:
    ahhh.it was bound to happen.with good reviews and response comes hubris … which leads to the show completely going off the rails.

    it was fun while it lasted.i expect season two to be a complete departure from the book and not for the better.many of the changes last season were neutral at best and often worse than the story from the book.

    i pretty much have no confidence in a show that has flat roofed buildings in a super snowy locale, and a mish-mash barbarian tribe with no noticable redeeming qualities that smacks of racism and inept art direction, a set up scene thatwent heavy on the gore for no apparent reason that defies the shows own internal logic and a show that couldn’t even manage to make dead animals and people look realistic most of the time and then of course there is the sexposition farce and the idiotic character of Roz who wasted at least 30 minutes of screen time.

    it is all down hill from here folks.mark my words.brace for complete FUBAR ness from here on out.

    +1

    Im with WIJB all the way. I don’t get the willingness to accept stupid unnecessary some of you fanboys display.

    D&D already proved they couldn’t handle such a big project with season 1. Season 2 is shaping up to be A LOT worse than season 1. It’s just no way they can redeem season 2 from all the fuck ups that is happening.

    I think the show will be OK at the very best, but Im not interested in OK. I want awesome…

      Quote  Reply

  108. OhWhoCares
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    Lina,

    I’m not trying to argue with you, because I do understand your point. I brought up the aging up because someone mentioned they wouldn’t want more child actors. I don’t think it would change the dynamic that much to age them since bran is aged too, I just want at least one of them there. I love the Reeds. They are such unique characters though, I might trust them more in the hands of a more experienced actor

      Quote  Reply

  109. PatD
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 6:45 pm | Permalink

    Not sure where else to post this, except in casting news. But has anyone been watching the series Strike Back on Cinemax? Liam Cunningham just finished a stint as a badass IRA terrorist on that show, and, hooboy, I’m really looking forward to his Davos now.

    Last week’s previews show Iain Glen joins the storyline this week.

      Quote  Reply

  110. Joshua Taylor
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Epic knows nothing,

    Wow. Condescend much? I hope someday I will be saved by this unraveling truth you speak of. And then what? Will you and Jacopo Bellopo have this smug satisfaction that all is right with the world? Will you stop enjoying the phenomenon altogether when we come to the revelation that the show ‘sucks’?

    Sarcastic rant over.
    We get it your disatisfied with the show but why taint these civil discussions with so much venom and name calling (not you for the name calling, your more of the condescending type)?

    I am university educated, I read Dickens,Shakespeare, Moliere, Hemingway, Huxley, Orwell, Clarke, Herbert etc I am about as literate as you can get. I love Hitchcock, Godard, Truffaut, David Lean, Scorcese, Bergman. I think The Wire is the greatest thing to grace television. I also think Buffy the Vampire Slayer is the in the top 5 of that category but I am use to having to defend myself with condescending cynical people who can’t understand why I like the things I do. And I like ASOIAF. Of course, why else would I be here? To put it plainly I do not think that A Game of Thrones is the greatest tv show ever. It has a lot of flaws, but so it also has some incredible moments and nuances as well. I agree that is more of a phenomenon than a wholesale . quality HBO series like The Wire or The Sopranos or AMC’s Mad Men, yet I have this hope that it will improve. I think strict adherence to the source material harms the show. Pacing was the main bone of contention for me. The adaptation process needs to be refined and maybe just maybe they will do it right next season and the show will be more than dramatised highlights of ASOIAF. For every terrible Dothraki dress or poorly paced moment or cheap set design , there is Master Aemon’s speech to Jon Snow, there is Conleth Hill’s Varys, there is Charles Dances’ pitch perfect Lord Tywin, there is the beautifully rendered vista of Trident and the Twins at sundown. There is NCW uttering ‘there are no men like me, there is just me’ there is the Golgotha-esque execution of Eddard Stark….I could go on and on. But what’s wrong with not being cynical and being optimistic? Why should the likes of Jacopo Bellopo look down upon us “fanboys” for this enthusiasm? Speak your mind please, make valid balanced criticisms and let us know what needs to improve but don’t ‘tolerate’ us.

      Quote  Reply

  111. Joshua Taylor
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    The White Bullshit,

    Another one. Can’t you be civil?

      Quote  Reply

  112. Rose
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    This is … fascinating.

    I shall reserve judgement until later. My reaction now is basically just, like

    “Huh.”

      Quote  Reply

  113. Posted September 16, 2011 at 7:02 pm | Permalink

    Damn, this comes out when I can only write on a half-assed cell?

    I’m bored with HBO publicity department. I HATE being teased (which is different from GRRM’s clues and has a nuance of spite.) I would love for them to keep their mouth shut and just show us pics, or to make announcements saying “With GRRM’s approval we changed this character this way.”

    I would love some clarity.

    I have 2 very bad feelings about this. 1. they don’t care anymore about the “reader” viewers but only about the “non-reader” viewers, 2. on the contrary, they like to “tease” the reader-viewers and to pit them against each other for sensationalism.

    Other than that, I’m not opposed “a priori” to changes, and Oona is a lovely girl. I only wish this thing was not the cause of so much strife.

    I admit this is the first TV series I follow closely. Am I Pollyanna? Is it always this way?

    More when I get on a real computer.

      Quote  Reply

  114. daveb
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 7:06 pm | Permalink

    loco73,

    Do you have any racy and NSFW? :)

      Quote  Reply

  115. Del
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    Joshua Taylor:
    The White Bullshit,

    Another one. Can’t you be civil?

    Some people have difficulty accepting criticism, and try to head it off by being insulting before the fact. It’s especially odd when generally those sorts just spout out “You guys just can’t take criticism” in the same posts.

      Quote  Reply

  116. Zack
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 8:08 pm | Permalink

    I have to say I don’t love coming here and reading possible story alterations. Not because I don’t think they’ll be any good, but because that’s the one area where I can be on equal ground with non-readers, and have plot surprises in store to look forward to.

      Quote  Reply

  117. Epic knows nothing
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    At this point a lot of people agree with the problems in season 1. The idea that season 2 is going to be worse is a pretty wild guess, and honestly I don’t think it’s possible. Well, I didn’t think it was possible, so my mind was blown just now. But right now with all the excitement and speculation, I don’t feel like it’s going to be worse, I dont’ know why someone would come to that conclusion. Oona Chaplin is a great actor, that’s a totally good thing. Added: Good actors need good scripts to really really put it over. That’s what I’m really hoping for, but have no basis for being optimistic.

      Quote  Reply

  118. Joshua Taylor
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    Epic knows nothing,

    That’s what I’m talking about! Sorry If I sound condescending…:-)

      Quote  Reply

  119. purplejilly
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    john: I hope she will be naked in some scenes!

    I’m sure they’ve added riders to all the S. 2 contracts:
    “Must agree to appear naked as often as required and be in tubs of pudding. Also must practice bad porn side effects (*slurp*)”

      Quote  Reply

  120. purplejilly
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    Steve Hugh Westenra: Robb and Jeyne are a bit bland in the books, so I can understand that D&D might want to flesh them out. On the other hand, because I find them bland and boring I’m not sure I want them to bother, if that makes sense? Richard Madden does a good job in the show, don’t get me wrong, but I just never found Robb as multifaceted a character as many of the others.

    I always found the fact that Jeyne seemed so bland and her family was not of great nobility to make it even more compelling that Robb made such a blunder, and dooms himself. If it were wild, reckless romance, exotic adventure, true love, the REAL, true, amazing love, then it would make all the breaking of the Frey vows worthwhile, and yea, even the death worthwhile. But just for some boring girl with a jumped up family, makes it all the more tragic.

      Quote  Reply

  121. Critical Geek
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    you mean you didn’t catch that the body parts were lined up in a pattern similar to the burn pattern of the pyre that spawned the dragons? And you call yourself a picker of nigling details. Obviously wight walker magic needs a pattern of bloody corpses to make the rest of them rise. Sheesh.

      Quote  Reply

  122. Critical Geek
    Posted September 16, 2011 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    The White Bullshit,

    Put yer money where yer mouth is and cough up another 50 million to make it awesome then.Til then, I’m fine with “best show on tv when it’s on”.

    I WANT to see the scenes missing from the books. These are interesting scenes. These are interesting characters. The show could completely skip some storylines (sorry blackfish) and i’ll be fine, because now watching the series and reading the books is like seeing even more points of view of the same series of events.

      Quote  Reply

  123. Joshua Taylor
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 12:34 am | Permalink

    Critical Geek,

    Amen brother!

      Quote  Reply

  124. KG
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 1:30 am | Permalink

    Who Is Jacopo Belbo?,

    Wah wah wah. Go watch reality TV then.

      Quote  Reply

  125. loco73
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 2:06 am | Permalink

    Critical Geek,

    Could you please cover any spoilers for those of us that haven’t read the books?

      Quote  Reply

  126. loco73
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 2:10 am | Permalink

    daveb,

    LOL..I didn’t find any…But you are free to look for them…shouldn’t be a problem finding them…

      Quote  Reply

  127. loco73
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 2:14 am | Permalink

    I personally like that she might be on the show…She has such a cool first name…Oona…I love saying that. The fact that her last name is Chaplin can’t hurt either and it adds to her mystique…LOL !
    Who knows she might even entertain the cast and crew with a table “bread” dance or show them how to cook and eat their shoes and shoelaces, just like her grandpa in the movie “The Gold Rush”…

    Oona…me likeee!

      Quote  Reply

  128. Posted September 17, 2011 at 3:01 am | Permalink

    Slept on it, am still baffled. First of all, where do the “Volantis” news come from? HBO? Oona? I said above that one of my suspicions was that TPTB cared only about new viewers and not old fans. Thinking back on it I must be wrong, because only us old fans would pick up the Volantis reference. It means nothing to everybody else.

    I’m happy if they flesh out Jeyne. That was something I felt was missing in the books. I’m trying not to troll for the sake of trolling: I was happy with how much S1 was faithful to the books, and based on that I’m reasonably sure S2 will be a worthwile product even for us fans.

    But I can’t get rid of the image I quoted on a previous thread, of TPTB throwing us bloody morcels of info and us falling on them snarling and biting each other.

    I think I should just stay away from rumours and enjoy S2 as a surprise when it comes out. Yes yes, I know, I’ll mind the door.

      Quote  Reply

  129. Obsidian
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 3:13 am | Permalink

    Wait..you could tell us , but then you’d have to kill us ?

    Which rascal put that on Oona’s pic ,and are you speaking for yourself , or D&D ?

      Quote  Reply

  130. Tar Kidho
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 3:25 am | Permalink

    I could tell you but then I’d have to kill you? Give it your best shot, Winter! :-)

    Edit: should have refreshed before posting – Obsidian beat me to it while I was reading through last day’s posts. So I guess you have new information that you will only share if we beg until our knees bleed?

      Quote  Reply

  131. SugarVampire
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 5:00 am | Permalink

    Obviously, D&D made some rookie mistakes. However, their desires to get most of the books on the screen and cautiously work within the tight restraint of HBO to make the series viable no matter what are to be applauded. Regardless of the official words of HBO SVPs, if HBO told D&D they will increase season 2′s budget 20% and want 12 episodes in June, I doubt that D&D would refuse.

    Oona’s change is obviously a way to flush out the background story of lady Westerlings’ heritage now instead of season 5 (AFfC). It might also dovetail the change of Arya as cupbearer for Tywin, hence have a chance to give hints to his conspiracy with lady Westerlings instead of his subtle reveal to Tyrion in ASoS. Don’t worry – Tywin’s plots with Boltons and Freys were hatched after Tywin left Harrenhal and the marriage unfolded.

      Quote  Reply

  132. Dee
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 5:56 am | Permalink

    The Robb/Jeyne story in the book is on the heavy side of disbelief suspension (the injured leader of aggressor army is being tended alone by the sacked lord’s daughter? is he asking to be murdered?). My guess would be that they’re setting up for Robb and Jeyne-with-a-false-name in a ‘can’t help falling in love’ drama before finding out each other’s real identities. Then Robb would hold back, trying to honour the Frey marriage contract, has a moment of weakness due to anguish when word of Theon’s betrayal reaches him, and BOOM bye bye kingdom.

      Quote  Reply

  133. Winter Is Coming
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 7:45 am | Permalink

    Obsidian,
    Tar Kidho,

    C’mon dudes, it’s in quotes and it’s a pic of Oona, who do you think is supposed to be saying it? ;)

      Quote  Reply

  134. Posted September 17, 2011 at 8:26 am | Permalink

    Epic knows nothing,
    i’m puzzled – what are you still doing here then? I don’t get it, if you didn’t like the show and you “laugh at how bad it is”, just stop watching it. Also, i really can’t understand how is possible you didn’t like it AT ALL – there are so many parts of it which are just amazing, period. You may not like the writing or the adaptation, but what about the set and the acting?

    knowsomething: You know, I’m really sick of the veiled racist statements here. Give me a effin’ break. Do you really think that Oona Chaplin is some kind of exotic, foreign beauty who can only be a Martell because those are the only characters that can vaguely be ethnic in Martin’s universe?

    god, I CAN’T BEIEVE IT. The racism thing again? Face it: westerosi nobles are supposed to look european. Eurpoens who lived during the feudalistic age. Not even mediterrean, just English. And maybe French orGerman. That’s how almost all (maybe all) Westerosi nobles are supposed to look like. I was puzzled with Oona’s appearance as well, and i thought she was a weird choice for JW. I said nothing because Nina Gold is amazing, but i still think it and i’m not racist. Just stop with this thing, is annoying

      Quote  Reply

  135. Steve Hugh Westenra
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 8:35 am | Permalink

    Re-reading the post itself, one of the main problems with our theories so far is that they place more emphasis on Jeyne/Oona and not less. If HBO claim she is playing a small role and that she’s only in two scenes, that’s not much of an expansion of Jeyne Westerling’s storyline.

    Is it possible they’re planning to show the real blossoming of the Robb/Jeyne relationship next season, so that the RW is even more hard-hitting?

      Quote  Reply

  136. Tar Kidho
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 9:24 am | Permalink

    Winter Is Coming,

    After a certain message on a certain box, you should know that we always WANT to read more into things than is really there :-)

      Quote  Reply

  137. Krishnan Guru-Murthy
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    Speculation of the wild, verging on ridiculous variety: What if your source didn’t hear ‘Lissa’ or ‘Melissa’, but ‘Nissa’? Oona’s character is supposed to be from Volantis – maybe she’s bringing Azor Ahai into it?

      Quote  Reply

  138. knowsomething
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Elena Amici,

    Yep, it is annoying. Stop it. I’ve read your comments from the other threads. Do some self-reflection and stop it.

      Quote  Reply

  139. Dan
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    knowsomething,

    Whoa, that’s racist knowsomething. Everybody knows that Yep is an acronym for “you ethnic pantywaist”. That’s not even veiled racism, it’s in your face racism. I am personally offended. Tsk, tsk.

      Quote  Reply

  140. Posted September 17, 2011 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    STOP. FEEDING. THE. TROLLS.

      Quote  Reply

  141. Posted September 17, 2011 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    knowsomething,

    sorry, i don’t get what you mean. Seriously, what should i stop?
    You’re the one who started with the racism again – where there’s none. I hope that’s just your way to tell me that you were kidding and i didn’t get the joke :)

      Quote  Reply

  142. HonestJerk
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    Again, is it possible to say that I find Oona a rather bland looking person without charges of racism? ha ha

    She’s not ugly, but IMO, she’s no better looking than a million people you’d see on the street and never turn your head at.

    People will say “Jeyne’s suppose to be plain and average” yada yada yada, this is TV. Robb’s suppose to “fall in love at first sight” … Jeyne should have at least been as attractive as every other girl on the show: Dany, Irri, Gilly, Margery, Marri Maz Durr etc.

    Do people watch The Hour? (good show). Oona is cast as the Ice Queen.

    Now she’s a mysterious yet plain girl from Volantis? Give me a break

      Quote  Reply

  143. Epic knows nothing
    Posted September 17, 2011 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    Elena Amici: i’m puzzled – what are you still doing here then? I don’t get it, if you didn’t like the show and you “laugh at how bad it is”, just stop watching it. Also, i really can’t understand how is possible you didn’t like it AT ALL – there are so many parts of it which are just amazing, period. You may not like the writing or the adaptation, but what about the set and the acting?

    Like I said in the post you are reacting to, I love the show even though I can laugh at its failings. I’m not exactly trivializing the problems but I am not relentlessly bringing them up.

    Elena Amici, There are parts of the show that I thought were good. I post sometimes about those rare shining moments in detail and I wish there had been more for me to get inspired by. The actors were mostly excellent; better than I could have expected in my dreams.

    I mean it when I say I respect people who think this show is amazing, even though I don’t understand it myself. And when I wrote “the truth reveals itself to those who look” it doesn’t mean the truth is objective–I totally accept that not everyone is as brilliant as I am.

    It is always very exciting when a long time WiC poster suddenly decides to do a 180, goes soothsayer on us, and post some desperate hopeless doom. A rare treat! Especially since that guy is guilty in the past of having called me a troll because I had unmet sky high expectations. Or because I live under a bridge.

    Once you are in knee deep in this muck, where you know all the casting rumors and the players that work behind the scenes, and the nicknames of those who post on a regular basis start to look familiar, you are then part of something you can’t really step away from. I will try harder to not to make everyone hate me because I kind of like it here and I make some sort of contribution. And PS, I don’t think WIJC is gone; he evidently had a semi-spiritual doom and gloom revelation he was excited to share with us but that only sparked a dark little fire. There’s no way he won’t be back and change his mind at least a little when the show actually airs.

      Quote  Reply

  144. Posted September 18, 2011 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    Epic knows nothing: I will try harder to not to make everyone hate me because I kind of like it here and I make some sort of contribution

    First: sorry to intrude (I have plenty of time).

    Well, I like to read what you have to say. You write very well and you’re funny…and sometimes quite a challenge (I guess you already know it).
    I don´t understand that someone could hate another person here for whatever reason.

    Elena: I like you too of course.

      Quote  Reply

  145. Chris
    Posted September 18, 2011 at 1:08 am | Permalink

    Jeyne Poole? Sansa’s friend who is the daughter of Ned’s head guard?

      Quote  Reply

  146. loco73
    Posted September 18, 2011 at 6:59 am | Permalink

    Can’t we just all get along!?!?!? LOL…forget all this on-line fighting, lets instead meet in a field and beat each other with bats, axes, swords, knives etc…Winter, FaBio and the rest of the top brass on this site can preside over the melee! Those of us who survive will retain the right to continue posting here without being a bunch of douches, those who don’t, get a Dothraki funeral pire!

    If Oona Chaplin is not suitable for the “Game Of Thrones” cast, then I have in mind a perfect replacement for her…none other than “Jersey Shore’s” own legendary “actress”, J-Woww! We don’t have to worry about her race because she has none…unless “orange” can be qualified as a new one!

    She can play the strong silent type…I know at least one kid that would be happy to suckle on her ample busom, for some reason he keeps yelling “Make the bad man fly!”.

    There you go, problem solved!

      Quote  Reply

  147. Posted September 18, 2011 at 7:32 am | Permalink

    Epic knows nothing,

    i get it. I’m sorry i think i misunderstood – i thought you were saying that the only reason why you’re around is to..well, to troll.
    I’m not saying i don’t do that, because there are a few TV shows that i only watch because they’re so bad i can’t help laughing (CW’s Gossip Girl, ABC Family’s PLL & the secret life of an american teenager and, above all, the best (or worst) TV show ever, smallville) but i couldn’t understand why somebody would like to troll about GoT which, whether people may like it or not, is better than the aforesaid shows. (*)
    Now i understand what you reall meant & I think you have a good point :)
    i’m sorry for the misunderstanding :)

    PS: (*) I still can’t understand how is possible you dislike EVERY PART of the show. Serioulsy, can you explain? I really want to know.

    PPS: If you’re really looking for an incredibly awful show, i suggest Smallville. Really, just watch a random episode. You’ll se an horrible opening credit sequence, random plot, cliffhanger solved in the first 5 min. of the next episode, a bunch of contraddictions, Tom Welling’s acting and so on. It’s wonderful, in a twisted way.

    PPPS: Oh, i almost forgot. What about jersey shore? You’ll love to hate it, if you can stand watching it. (Thanks loco!)

    andrea: Elena: I like you too of course.

    i’m rather flattered ;)

    EDIT: can someone please explain why every time i want to write a comment using my first name only the blog still publishes the comment with my full name on it? It’s annoying!

      Quote  Reply

  148. Steve Hugh Westenra
    Posted September 18, 2011 at 8:21 am | Permalink

    purplejilly,

    Hi! I just noticed you’d responded specifically to me, and although I had read your comment for some reason that didn’t register, so sorry!
    I agree with you completely about Jeyne’s character, as well as the tragedy of the red wedding. I think it would downplay everything that happens to make her just another schemer (which is something they seem to want to do with every love-interest out there (Loras, for instance). I definitely enjoy the scheming that goes on in this series, but to have absolutely every character behave that way invalidates, to some extent, the well-drawn portraits of human emotion and foible that GRRM has painted in the books. If every character is a Cersei or a Littlefinger, character-wise they tend to look a little redundant.
    What I meant by flesh out was simply explore their relationship more, which could easily just mean showing Robb fall in love with her on-screen. Although I’m not a fan of Robb or Jeyne, particularly, I can see how this makes a lot of sense of the show. They don’t have to make either character super-sketchy, but they can flesh out preexistent aspects of their personalities.

      Quote  Reply

  149. Vered
    Posted September 18, 2011 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    She’s supposed to be Jeyne Westerling? Really? I just don’t see it…..
    I thought she was blonde… but then I coukd be wrong. She does have a more northern look so maybe Jeyen Pool is a better idea….

    As for the idea of them (maybe) making Jeyne the lead scheme when it comes to Robb and later the Red Wedding I would so hate that! Give us one clean honnest (well sorta-honnest) romence. There’s nothing worng with that. I mean are the Starks the only ones who’re supposed to have honnor? I like the idea that Jeyne was just shoved into the whole mess by her mother/father.
    I think it would make more sense that she found out along the way and didn’t know anything untill a later date beacuse I remember that in the books when Robb rode the the Frreys for the wedding she rode after him crying and asking him to take her with him – maybe she just forund out what was about to happen and wanted to be with him.
    I’d rather remember her this way….

      Quote  Reply

  150. Joe
    Posted September 18, 2011 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    I was an extra at the Oxcross scene. I was supposed to be playing dead so I couldn’t see and hear everything that was going on but this is what I picked up:

    Rob and Roose Bolton are walking around after the battle. They come across ‘Jeyne’, a nurse treating a wounded Lannister soldier. She has a go at Robb, saying something along the lines of “are you going to help me or are you too busy touring your victory?” Bolton, true to form, tells Robb to move on and that his own wounded are more important. Robb decides to help Jeyne amputate the wounded soldier’s leg.

    They filmed a bit more dialogue after that. Jeyne tells Robb that he doesn’t look like a King and Robb gives his reasons for coming out west and raising hell.

    The final shot involved Jeyne packing up and leaving on a wagon. The dialogue went as follows:
    “You never told me where you’re from”
    “Volantis”
    “You’re far from home. He [the Lannister soldier] was lucky you were here”
    “He was unlucky that *you* were”

    Personally I think that’s the height of it. I doubt that she’ll go on to be revealed as Jeyne Westerling (although they could have picked a different name if that’s the case). The scene seemed to be more focussed on showing the differences between Robb and Roose Bolton. In an earlier shot there was a debate between the two of them. Roose wanted to flay the prisoners, Robb didn’t.

    Make of it what you will.

      Quote  Reply

  151. Vered
    Posted September 19, 2011 at 1:40 am | Permalink

    Hey Jo,
    Thanks for telling about your time and the scenes they were shooting.
    In the Books Robb was wounded too and Jeyen Westerling was taking care of him. Maybe they’re changing that. If they do she can still be Westerling, but she can also be just a nurse treating awounded man.
    I guess the only way to find out is to watch the siries.;-)

      Quote  Reply

  152. Peltast
    Posted September 19, 2011 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    One thing I haven’t seen brought up: does it really make sense for a noblewoman to pretend to be a commoner in times of war? A commoner woman in war is quite likely to be raped, especially if she was captured, no?

      Quote  Reply

  153. Mark
    Posted September 19, 2011 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    My guess: after seeing Roose Bolton mistreat captives, she decides to hide her identity as a Westerling. She will briefly interact with Robb, but Robb will get injured following the battle (perhaps by some sort of assasin or ambitious individual figuring to collect a reward from the Lannisters) and this will be one of the primary cliffhangers for season 2. Season 3 will begin with Jeyne tending to Robb, helping heal him, and revealing her identity as a Westerling

    As for the foriegn issue/theories, I do notice she has strikingly similar features to Shae from the first season, and it did seem that Shae’s foriegn background was played up as a much bigger deal in the show than in the book, whether there’s a connection here or not. I’m only partway through AFFC but it certainly seems Shae’s background isn’t really meaningful at all in the books. I don’t remember if she was even portrayed as distinctly foriegn (she may have been I can’t remember), while in the show this was made very explicit and her family background is even discussed during the scene where she’s playing “never have I ever” in the tent with Tyrion and Bronn

      Quote  Reply

  154. OhWhoCares
    Posted September 19, 2011 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Joe,

    Wow. Interesting. Thanks a lot for the info.

      Quote  Reply

  155. Bombshell Funbags
    Posted September 19, 2011 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    To me it seems simple. They are scrapping the Westerling part of the story because it’s not important. The important part is that Robb is falling in love with someone that is different from everyone’s he’s ever met before (including the part that she’s not a noble). It is the motive that leads a huge part of the SoIaF story. The book doesn’t really explore why Robb was willing to throw everything away for something selfish and personal like love. The audience will be on his side as tensions mount about this “unwise, romantic choice” because they’ll see Jeyne as a rare thing in Westeros, a person with a good heart and an impassioned Tessa Quayle sort of fearlessness. As opposed to the book Jeyne Westerling who is kind of blah. If she would be lying about being a noble, it would be confusing and unimportant to the tension of the love story that ends its arc with the rw. I would love this change. I think it’s time D&D take SoIaF and make into a really good drama, and this would be a step in the right direction. I think it would also result with a more likeable Robb than in the books. Thanks Joe for that credibly clear information being so much more than anyone could expect from an extra who played dead.

      Quote  Reply

  156. Posted September 19, 2011 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Bombshell Funbags: I think it would also result with a more likeable Robb than in the books.

    I think you´re right. Nice idea.

      Quote  Reply

  157. DavidMG
    Posted September 22, 2011 at 6:06 am | Permalink

    you-know-nothing,

    You know nothing indeed. Jayne Westerling falls in love with Robb during A Clash of Kings (which corresponds to the second season), even though we do not find out until A Storm of Swords through Catelyn’s story. How is that near the end of the series?

      Quote  Reply

4 Trackbacks

  1. By Le cas Chaplin (2) « Game of Thrones on October 9, 2011 at 11:37 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Before commenting, please read our moderation and spoiler policy.
Want an avatar with your comments? Comment using Twitter or Facebook or get a Gravatar.

Some helpful HTML tags. Wrap these tags around the appropriate text:
Add a link: <a href="INSERT-URL-HERE"> </a>
Bold text: <strong> </strong>
Italic text: <em> </em>
Spoiler: <b> </b>

  • Recent Comments

  • Media Updates

    Skull at Craster's Keep Trucks Skull at Mance's camp Wildlings in the snow Joffrey Cersei on bed
  • Tags

  • Archives

    • 2013 (419)
    • 2012 (550)
    • 2011 (512)
    • 2010 (309)
    • 2009 (174)
    • 2008 (47)