// $gooaudioplayer = file_get_contents('http://gameofowns.com/audioplayer.html'); // echo $gooaudioplayer;

Ehle out, Fairley in

Filed Under: Casting, News, Speculation

Michelle FairleyTHR reports the role of Catelyn Stark has been recast, in what they call a ‘minor tweaking’ of the pilot. Jennifer Ehle is being replaced by the Irish actress Michelle Fairley. In his blog, James Hibberd writes his sources say the change was due to ‘behind-the-scenes’ considerations and not due to Ehle’s performance. This of course means that Catelyn scenes from the pilot will need to be reshot. It is likelly this is the bad news GRRM mentioned in his recent Not a Blog post. We will be able to see Fairley play Hermione Granger’s mother in the coming Harry Potter installments.

Hear Me Roar: This came out of the blue. We could speculate there were scheduling, contracting, or simply personal reservations (Ehle’s recent maternity could have played a part) that brought this about. I believe we have all been mentally prepared to see Ehle in the role next year, and looking forward to it. Now we have another actress to get familiar with. She has the right looks, as far as I am concerned, and was probably considered for the role already during the first casting round. While I would not call this change bad news, it is an unexpected snag in the planning the producers could not foresee. I hope there will not be many more surprises like that on the way to the first season premiere next spring.

Tagged as , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Have you already read all the books and/or don't care about spoilers? You can reveal all the spoilers in the comments with the click of a link below.

422 Comments

  1. George
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:09 pm | Permalink

    That's a shame for Ms. Ehle. Maybe we'll find out why later on as the series develops.

    HBO has done this before, with Tara Thornton on True Blood, they brought in Rutina Wesley to replace the original pilot actress. And since Rutina Wesley is awesome as Tara, I'm inclined to trust HBO's judgement.

      Quote  Reply

  2. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    What. The. F@ck.

    I'm gonna reserve judgement, but I don't like this woman, based on the online photos I could find. She doesn't look like Catelyn to me.

    But again, I'm not about to go off the deep end like the Tamzin critics. I'll wait until I've seen her in the role first.

      Quote  Reply

  3. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    Does this announcement imply there won't be anymore recastings? Would they announce them all at once if there was more than one?

      Quote  Reply

  4. Emily
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    Oh man! I really wanted Lizzy Bennett to be Cat. I'm sure this new actress will be fine, but I haven't seen her in anything. Hopefully this was Ehle's choice–not a firing. Perhaps she thought it would be too much work with a small child? (Now I'm worried about Lena Headey leaving too!)

      Quote  Reply

  5. Tremere
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    This is a totally unknown person for me. I just hope they took her for her skills and not as a cheap local alternative.

    I think this is her in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL914ymt9wY at 1:10 so we can check it out a bit. Correct me if I'm wrong

      Quote  Reply

  6. nicole
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    It's weird and suprising to me, but only because I had already accepted Ehle as Catelyn and this is kinda out of left field. But, I definitely trust that HBO is doing the right thing, and now that I'm looking at her, Fairley looks like she will fit into the role and the rest of the cast. I agree with swordpen who said that Ehle was a bit on the dainty side for the role. I couldn't picture her as un-Cat.

      Quote  Reply

  7. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    Well, that's not reserving your judgement much ;) give this some time to settle in.

      Quote  Reply

  8. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:22 pm | Permalink

    I'm a little sad. Now I can't use the "Jennifer Ehle is in this" line to get my roommate to watch it. __I guess we'll see.

      Quote  Reply

  9. Toby
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:24 pm | Permalink

    Shocking. Hopefully this is the only bad news George was referring to (He did mention several fronts). Lets spare a thought for poor miss Fairley however, she's already had one fictional child slaughtered by Jaime Lannister in the recent Suduvu contest and now she has to endure him crippling another! Still, I'm sure she will greatly enjoy kicking shit on him come season 2!

      Quote  Reply

  10. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    I think there are several possible explanations. One I think is likely is that Ehle, having not appeared in an ongoing, episodic television series before (CAMOMILE LAWN and PRIDE & PREJUDICE were limited mini-series) may have decided after the pilot that the workload (spending 6-7 months away from home every year for the next three years) was not compatible with family life or giving up the amount of other film and stage roles involved. It's not uncommon for actors to commit mentally to a project only to find the actual reality of the production is rather more than they were expecting.

    Total supposition, but if it isn't a performance issue, than it must be a scheduling or time commitment problem.

      Quote  Reply

  11. Lex
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    Wha???!?!?

    Maybe this is the "bad news" that GRRM mentioned on his blog yesterday?

      Quote  Reply

  12. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    The most annoying part of this is having to go back and do those reshoots, but she's not bad. Ehle was an ideal casting, so it's a shame, but Fairley looks right and I'm optimistic. That said, losing a big name is never good. Like someone said above – it would have been great to use the "Jennifer Ehle is in this" line to get non-fan people to watch it, but Sean Bean is in it too, so that works just as well!

      Quote  Reply

  13. Tremere
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:35 pm | Permalink

    Going through her filming history I see this interesting role she played…

    Mrs. Marlish in the movie "The Others", where she played one of the others.

    I should not be the only one to see the irony in it.

    In the end she is good enough to be playing in movies so why shouldn't she be good enough for our movies. I just miss the riddle game GRRM could have made out of it. With her being an Other and playing in Harry Potter like someone else in the cast as well

      Quote  Reply

  14. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:35 pm | Permalink

    I hope the rest is not connected to GOT, he DID say several fronts …

      Quote  Reply

  15. Lex
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    I just PRAY no one else gets re-cast. For example, if Sean Bean or Peter Dinklage leaves the project, I will be CRUSHED!

      Quote  Reply

  16. veghist
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    Isn't Catelyn supposed to be pretty?

      Quote  Reply

  17. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    IMHO Fairley looks more like Cat in my head.
    I am not saying at all that Ehle was a bad choice, but I like Michelle s face more for Cat.

    So, as I said earlier the casting is in progress.

      Quote  Reply

  18. Emily
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

      Quote  Reply

  19. Hodor hodor
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    I think she could pull the look off once they address her hair color. She seems to have the weathered face that has seen a lot of pain and distress as seen in the later novels. Let's hope she can act well too, which I'm sure isn't an issue if HBO made the move.

      Quote  Reply

  20. Md.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    I'm not sure yet how to feel on this choice. Ehle has definitely grown on me so it's a shame to see her go.
    I was looking for more pictures of Michelle Fairley but there aren't many around but on some of them she looks a bit too old (at least older than I imagine Cat). Does anybody know how old she is? But maybe it's just the photos. I definitely like some of her better (younger) pics and she has nice blue eyes (the one thing that bugged me about the Ehlec choice).

    Found some more pictures here: http://www.snitchseeker.com/gallery/thumbnails.ph

      Quote  Reply

  21. Lex
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    I'm not super keen on her look (she seems quite a bit older than Ehle), but her acting seems pretty good in that youtube clip.

      Quote  Reply

  22. nicole
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    ouch. i find Fairley to be an attractive woman.

      Quote  Reply

  23. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    "Behind the scenes reasons" is a pretty strange and dubious statement for an announcement like this. It's one I've never seen before in any re-casting announcement. Usually you get phrases like "creative differences," "family/personal reasons." It could be anything. If it was a problem they had with her performance, they would never publicly say it, so it's likely we'll never hear about it except maybe as gossip at some later date. But professionally, that kind of thing is just not done, especially for an actress of her stature.

    I know that after the pilot of "Star Trek: Voyager," the original Captain, Genevieve Bujold, dropped out because the pace of shooting was something she knew she wasn't familiar with. So, it could be something like that, but maybe it's more about the size and length of the commitment – the style of shooting the show seems to be more like a movie set than at TV show, which is very different.

    I don't know, it's a huge question for me what that statement could mean.

      Quote  Reply

  24. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    I agree with sordpen and nicole. As much as I like Jennifer Ehle, especially for her role as Lizzy Bennet, and was happy to see her name attached to GoT, I had a hard time picturing her as un-Cat. But that could just be the recurring Lizzy Bennet image I have…

    The reshooting is a bummer, though.

    But otherwise, this isn't the end of the world for me. I'd rather a believable ensemble cast than a collection of big names who don't mix well together.

    And hopefully this is the only recasting they will have to do. I'm worried about the rest of GRRM's "bad news on several fronts"….

      Quote  Reply

  25. Lex
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    I hate to focus on looks, but… In terms of Fairley's "look", I think she'll be excellent as the grief-stricken Cat, and as Un-Cat…

    But it may be a bit strange in the first season. Isn't Sansa supposed to look just like a younger version of her? Does Fairley look like someone that Littlefinger would be in love with/obsessed with?

      Quote  Reply

  26. Md.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:48 pm | Permalink

    In fact, she was pretty dreadfull if you ask me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsnG8743oxU Or maybe it's just that Rutina kicks ass as Tara.

      Quote  Reply

  27. Lex
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    Jeez… please, let's not repeat the embarassing type of reaction that Tamzin initially got. That made us all look bad.

      Quote  Reply

  28. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    I agree with sordpen and nicole. As much as I like Jennifer Ehle, especially for her role as Lizzy Bennet, and was happy to see her name attached to GoT, I had a hard time picturing her as un-Cat. But that could just be the recurring Lizzy Bennet image I have…

    The reshooting is a bummer, though.

    But otherwise, this isn't the end of the world for me. I'd rather a believable ensemble cast than a collection of big names who don't mix well together.

    And hopefully this is the only recasting they will have to do. I'm worried about the rest of GRRM's "bad news on several fronts"….

      Quote  Reply

  29. Steve
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    Thank you to The Rabbit for helping get the worst imaginable photo from Google Images. Just about any other one is better than this one. I like the one from here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/theatreblog/2007/

    I think the new lady will be great, she has plenty of experience. Goodbye Ehle, it just wasn't meant to be. Plus I couldn't imagine you as Undead Cat. And plus you looked suspiciously like Gillian Anderson.

      Quote  Reply

  30. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    Yes, on several fronts makes me nervous…

      Quote  Reply

  31. Lex
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    Worst photo? I don't think so. THIS is the worst google photo:

    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arch

      Quote  Reply

  32. Molda
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

    It's not that important, but If you are talking about beauty, i think that she is more attractive than Ehle.

      Quote  Reply

  33. Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    I definitely think she looks too old for Catelyn. Ugh.

      Quote  Reply

  34. Lex
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    How is your comment helpful in any way?

      Quote  Reply

  35. Molda
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:11 pm | Permalink

    After seeing more of her photos i am not that sure anymore about what i said before :))

      Quote  Reply

  36. Steve
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

    I'm not trying to be helpful.

      Quote  Reply

  37. Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for posting that. Clearly HBO knows when sometihng isn't working and isn't afriad to change it. Rutina's Tara is so much more interesting.

      Quote  Reply

  38. blah
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    YEAH UN CAT IS RIGHT

      Quote  Reply

  39. Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    I've yet to see a good photo of her. Unless Cat is supposed to be a homely looking lady in her mid 50's.

      Quote  Reply

  40. nicole
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    to those that are saying she looks too old for Catelyn–she was cast as Hermione Granger's mom in Harry Potter. the casting for HP has been superb no matter what anyone thinks about the books or movies, so if they think she is appropriate to play a 15/16 year old's mom i will not disagree with them.

      Quote  Reply

  41. pat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    Nicole you have the most terrible logic i have ever encountered. These are two different people.

      Quote  Reply

  42. Emily
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    I'd like to see a photo of her not in character at an event or something (premiere?). Because in that lovely Google image shot of her (http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arch… ) and as Emilia in "Othello", the makeup seems to be making her intentionally dowdy.

      Quote  Reply

  43. Vohdre
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    I don't have a big issue with the change as at least they haven't started shooting episodes yet. My only question…she's supposed to king of look like Sansa?

      Quote  Reply

  44. Kevin
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    After looking at some one those I think that should will fill the role well. I always imagined her looks as rivaling that of the Lanister b*^ch maybe a little thicker but very attractive none the less. She seems like a good actress from the small clip I found on youtube.

      Quote  Reply

  45. Kevin
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

      Quote  Reply

  46. Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    actually i think that the other actress on this photo would make much batter Cat… :/ I agree that she looks a bit too old, but that might be just characterization issue…

      Quote  Reply

  47. lut
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    Shes also supposed to be attractive. I dont get it, wasnt she even famed for it??

      Quote  Reply

  48. Steve
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    She is supposed to look like a hot milf with Tully hair and big boobs. Well, they missed the mark on Ehle and this one, and meanwhile Cersei has a monopoly on 'hot milf'. So apparently the Stark wife is supposed to look dignified and not so hot. Coz hot means shallow.

      Quote  Reply

  49. stef
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:49 pm | Permalink

    wow…. HBO should make an appearance on failblog

      Quote  Reply

  50. Steve
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    Yes, she was, lut: In the early 1920's until the beginning for WWII, she was renown for her beauty. Since then she has seen too many 'days at the theater'…

      Quote  Reply

  51. Steve
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    Okay you are right.

      Quote  Reply

  52. lut
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    haha i was talking about Catelyn

      Quote  Reply

  53. Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Bwahaha, good point there. :)

      Quote  Reply

  54. phil
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    My thoughts exactly. She is not in Cercei's league, but enough that Littlefinger practically fought Brandon to the death over her.

      Quote  Reply

  55. Steve
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Dear Rabbit, First of all, she is old. Second, you can't see Kelly's eyes, so by your logic, etc… . This doesn't change the fact that the above photograph complete with pools of molten darkness for eyes and an ashram smile, looks extremely fuzzy, weirdly benign and vaguely humanoid.

      Quote  Reply

  56. Steve
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:03 pm | Permalink

    Don't worry, you just need to see better photos of her. She is going to be Cat. She's perfect. Unlike TM.

      Quote  Reply

  57. Steve
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the Star Trek trivia, thank you very much.

      Quote  Reply

  58. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    The only main issue with the recasting I have is Rickton's age vs. Catelyn's.

      Quote  Reply

  59. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    why, a woman can give birth until menopause, and menopause surprise babies aren't uncommon… and we're talking of a Medieval setting here, with limited birth control measures…

      Quote  Reply

  60. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    and I thought his name was Rickon…. (that's the third time you spell it this way so I guess it is intentional)

      Quote  Reply

  61. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    It's Rickon.

      Quote  Reply

  62. blue
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    completely agree about the other actress! She is perfect! Kelly Reilly for Catelyn!

      Quote  Reply

  63. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    I'm dreadfully sorry to be so superficial, but Fairley looks so old and disheveled. Yes Cat goes through hell, but she *is* supposed to be an attractive lady. Maybe Ehle was too dainty, but this woman doesn't seem stronger to me, just more nondescript and mousy.

      Quote  Reply

  64. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    Yes she is. Even if she's not as attractive as Sansa, she's not supposed to be on the other extreme either. Wow, can't say I'm happy about this. Do the producers imagine Catelyn Stark to be some mousy hausfrau?

      Quote  Reply

  65. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    The only problem I can see here, is the that Jennifer Ehle is the bigger name than Fairley.
    And somehow we were used to picture her as Cat.

    Fairley is almost unknown actress, and not many of us are familiar with her work.
    The same case is with majority of the younger cast.

    I am pretty certain that HBO knows what is doing.

    I do not know what GRRM refered to yesterday in the bad news statement, hopefully I think that was it.

      Quote  Reply

  66. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    There's nothing we can really do except to Trust in the Awesome Power of Makeup. (Makeup is awesome, really. My bosses have no idea that I average 3 hours of sleep each Tuesday night due to excessive dancing.)

    I'd hate to see Fairley receive negative comments just because she replaced Ehle. It's not her fault, really. If we feel the need to criticize, we'll criticize HBO for their casting choices. But let's at least wait to see the pilot first.

    *says a prayer to the Gods of Makeup Awesomeness

      Quote  Reply

  67. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    That's what I thought in that photo too. Of the two, Fairley is not the one I'd pick for Cat. I'm seriously starting to think that the producers just don't get her. Or like her, which may be believable for this character.

      Quote  Reply

  68. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    To be honest, I do not remember exactly phisical description of Cat in the books. (except the colour of the hair).
    While reading the books I did not have impression of her being stunning beauty (contrary to Cersei – whose beauty was pointed out regulary).

      Quote  Reply

  69. pat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    You know what Rabbit, I absolutely loathe when people like yourself try and speak for everyone else. Go bahhhhhhhh in some other paddock

      Quote  Reply

  70. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, I've been spelling it wrong this whole time. Rickon. My mistake.

    I think my main issue is that while biologically possible, the odds of a woman giving birth in her 40s in a Medieval setting is low. However, the Maesters are a bit of a wild card as far as that goes, and (as my wife pointed out to me since my last post) while it *was* extremely rare, part of that has to do with the fact that living to 40 was extremely rare anyway.

    As I mentioned in the last thread, I was on the side of the casting Rory when others complained that he was too old, so shouldn't I be on board when they age up a female character I thought should be younger? I think so.

      Quote  Reply

  71. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    She looks like Sansa, who we know is very pretty. If Littlefinger sees Sasna and thinks back to his obsession for Catelyn, I'm thinking Catelyn Stark is probably quite attractive. Thick auburn hair, high cheekbones, sweet mouth, great rack, blue eyes that make Littlefinger wax rhapsodic, that's what we're told.

      Quote  Reply

  72. George
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    I believe Nicole is aware that Catelyn Stark is not Hermione Granger's mother. In fact, her logic is quite sound.

      Quote  Reply

  73. lut
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    exactly

      Quote  Reply

  74. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    I liked Ehle, but stuff doesn't always work out. That's cool, I'll miss her, but happy trails.
    But I still don't get this choice. Catelyn needs to still look impressive even when she's having her troubles, she needs to have some stature. Fairley looks like I could just gloss over her in a crowd. I hope she's a good actress, but I still wonder what on earth the producers have in mind for this character.

      Quote  Reply

  75. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    I think you got it all wrong, pat, I am speaking just for myself.

    I think, I have right to say loudly what I am thinking about that recasting.

      Quote  Reply

  76. hector19
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    On the bright side, this streamlines the casting process, since they can just have the same actress play Catelyn and Old Nan.

      Quote  Reply

  77. Posted March 19, 2010 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    There's nothing we can really do except to Trust in the Awesome Power of Makeup. (Makeup is awesome, really. My bosses have no idea that I average 3 hours of sleep each Tuesday night due to excessive dancing.)

    Let's see her act and then we'll talk. And if she's a bad casting choice, that's HBO's fault, really.

      Quote  Reply

  78. Pat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:01 pm | Permalink

    Your completely missing the point.

    Her reasoning was, first of all her personal oppinion on the casting of Harry Potter.
    Second, she plays a mother in that to a child of roughly the same age as one of Catelyn's. How the fuck does that make her eligable to be Catelyn Stark?
    Try elaborating? I dont understand why you think her logic is sound.

      Quote  Reply

  79. Steve B
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    I loved the idea of Ehle, but if she's recast, so be it. And people who think that attractive redhead is just perfect for Catelyn– you're smoking something. :P She __is__ very pretty, no doubt, but I'd never buy her as 1) the mother of a 16 year old, nor 2) someone of comparable age to Sean Bean.

    They've aged up the cast, that's clear. She's a good fit for some of the reimagining their doing. People who think she's not pretty enough are too stuck to the books. Her being pretty doesn't really have much to do with her character, like Cercei or Jaime, for instance. I buy her perfectly fine (from a pic) as an overprotective mom who's riding the fine line between steely hard and brittle. And _that's__ the core of Catelyn's character. As for whether Littlefinger would love someone as a teen if they weren't drop dead gorgeous. That seems a bit of an oversimplification of his character.

    Basically, Ehle was awesome, maybe this lady will be good to. They'll obviously not bring the same vision of Catelyn to the screen, but lots of different tweaks could work dramatically.

      Quote  Reply

  80. Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Well this is HBO we're talking about, not some local beauty shop. I'm sure they'll work out a fitting look for our Lady Stark.

    The Gods of Makep Awesomeness say hi.

      Quote  Reply

  81. George
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    WHY DON'T WE TRY AND KEEP IT CLASSY PEOPLE! You don't know anything about this woman and you're ready to tear her down based on a couple pictures? You barely have an accurate example of how she looks now, and not at all after make-up and hair.

    If I were going to rank the things I want to see from the actress playing Catelyn, I would be looking for performance, chemistry with the children, and a host of other things before looks. All of the characters are being aged up, and I think Fairley's look works well as the duty-bound wife and mother of five.

    Any of you who want to see "hot milfs" facing off against each other, go watch Cinemax after dark.

      Quote  Reply

  82. Pat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    "And somehow we were used to picture her as Cat.

    Fairley is almost unknown actress, and not many of us are familiar with her work.
    The same case is with majority of the younger cast. "

    Really? i see the words "we" and "us". Your trying to talk for everyone. Dont do it

      Quote  Reply

  83. Pat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    eligible**

      Quote  Reply

  84. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:10 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, we'll see what they do. But I'm thinking Catelyn Stark is not one of the characters the producers have a great vision for. I don't really mind if the picture posted here was what we were looking at, but if you look up some other ones online, it's beyond not being a beauty queen. She just seems like a different personality. But that's just me.

      Quote  Reply

  85. Jehphg
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    guys…would anyone be so kind to pass me the links in the coments? cause i am not seeing them right

      Quote  Reply

  86. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

    She doesn't have to be drop dead gorgeous, but if you were gonna guess which one here was Catelyn Stark — http://www.potterstoryweb.com/gallery/displayimag… — which would you pick? We don't need a bombshell, but from what I can see so far Fairley doesn't project anything stately, and Catelyn is that even while she goes through hell.

      Quote  Reply

  87. Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    What's funny is how I was planning a post centered on the fact that the green light happened without any casting changes. It's common enough in normal shows; something this size, with this many actors … it has to be like juggling cats, keeping the production together given that so many things can go wrong. Some actors don't jive with other actors, some have conflicting schedules, some even want to have some semblance of a normal life.

    I don't personally have any inside information, but I think Werthead might have hit the nail on the proverbial werthead. The long shoot could have been daunting for Ehle–she of the growing family and prodigious theatre schedule–and may have decided she'd bitten off a little more than she could chew. A single year is one thing, but three years is an entirely different commitment.

    My hope is that we don't lose Lena Headey due to similar circumstances, as she's about to have a baby, and Cersei is an even longer commitment than Catelyn.

    Aside: being that Headey still may have not given birth (or may have just given birth) to her baby when filming starts in June, it will be interesting to see how and when they do the re-shoots with Fairley. Possibly they'll just back-end them.

    At any rate, if this is the only re-casting they do (fingers crossed), at least it was someone who wasn't truly counting on this role to kick off a career in acting. I think I'd feel much worse for any of the kids, or Harington, or Madden.

      Quote  Reply

  88. Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    Well said.

      Quote  Reply

  89. Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    i also see the "not many" part so let's be less overeactive (don't know of i spelled it right) please?

      Quote  Reply

  90. shadallion
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    She is flat out UNATTRACTIVE!

      Quote  Reply

  91. Fleece
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    Odd. I found out that she is 45, so not much older than Ehle. So, technically, she should fit the part.
    The actress herself actually indeed looks like she is a mother of five living in a harsh medieval world. O_o

      Quote  Reply

  92. Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    I share your fear about Lean Headey, too.

      Quote  Reply

  93. Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    Crap. I was eagerly awaiting for more casting news, but not of this kind!

    With all my respect and affection to Ms Fairley, but of all the cast membres, she is the one I have more trouble to see "in character" by a wde margin. It's just so unlike the image of Catelyn Stark I had created…

    But, since there's nothing I (or any of us) can do about it, let's keep our hopes high. In HBO we trust, and so far they didn't let us down, didn't they?

      Quote  Reply

  94. shadallion
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    LOL, seriously!

    She is Tina Fey + 20 years.

    Fucking horrible.

      Quote  Reply

  95. shadallion
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    She is a horrible choice. First true blunder that I've seen from D&D on this.

    This pisses me off.

      Quote  Reply

  96. Md.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    You're welcome. I was actually wondering how that video surfaced . Could it have been officially released? Considering that it might put this actress in a bad light and all… It would be interesting if we could see such Ehle scenes one day.

      Quote  Reply

  97. shadallion
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    LOL!

      Quote  Reply

  98. Pat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    er what?
    by "not many" rabbit means, most are not familiar with , but thats beside the point anyway.
    (overactive)

      Quote  Reply

  99. valarwesteros
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Worst choice so far, no contest.

      Quote  Reply

  100. Pat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    and im not trying to be mean, its just extremely annoying

      Quote  Reply

  101. Md.
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    Personally I always imagined her as beautiful as Cersei, the difference being in style and behaviour. While Cersei is known to use her sex-appeal to get what she wants, Catelyn doesn't really play that card (although I have some vague memory of the Frey business hmmm…). Cat is more subtle. Book description aside, I just don't think it's that important to have her played by a drop dead gorgeous actress.

      Quote  Reply

  102. tootgoesby
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    yeah, nothing against her, shes not ugly or anything, but not catelyn

      Quote  Reply

  103. Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    The original TRUE BLOOD pilot leaked onto the Internet from an internal HBO source some months prior to transmission of the series.

      Quote  Reply

  104. bojuju
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:06 pm | Permalink
  105. Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    Except they say the True Blood pilot actress didn't fit in. The reasons here are different. Still, it's not the end of the world.

      Quote  Reply

  106. swordpen
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    I'm inclined to trust HBO's judgement as well, in fact I think this actress looks a *bit* more like Catelyn Stark (Jennifer Ehle seemed a bit too dainty to me, but I did like her as Catelyn)

      Quote  Reply

  107. swordpen
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 7:13 pm | Permalink

    that's just going from that photo though, so in the long run, I dunno :P

      Quote  Reply

  108. George
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    She's saying that HBO is not the only casting department that thinks Fairley looks the part of a teenager's mother, thus maybe she's not the withered hag you seem to see in these pictures. It's unlikely that two respected casting departments made a catastrophic error.

    Also, anyone with an IQ above 80 would probably notice that misspelling "eligible" is the least of your problems, which also include "you're", "opinion", misplaced commas, bad punctuation, awkward phrasing, and sentence fragments. Either edit or don't, and keep cursing to a minimum.

      Quote  Reply

  109. valarwesteros
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    WiC chose one of the _nicer_ photos. She's not ugly but she looks way older than she should, even with the aging up.

      Quote  Reply

  110. Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    As I said earlier, Ehle's previous starring TV roles were in mini-series (and more than a decade ago). Aside from that she seems to have done either movies or stage work or TV guest spots. Whilst GoT's pace of shooting isn't quite as insane as regular network American television, it's still going to be pretty tough going and likely something Ehle is not used to.

    In Belfast the other actors had nothing but praise for Ehles performance, including Sophie Turner who said she got on really well with Ehle and a couple of the other actors pointed out that Sophie and Jennier looked and acted very much like they could be mother and daughter. That to me did not suggest any kind of professional or acting problems.

    However, something that was mentioned was that Ehle was spending almost all of her spare time away from set with her family. Presumably for the full season shoot this would be impractical, and it is entirely possible that Ehle decided she didn't want to spend time apart from her family for the whole 6-7 month shoot, and she didn't realise that fully until the process of the pilot shoot.

    Another, extremely remote, possibility is that Ehle's agent sold her on the project with the idea that the pilot was extremely unlikely to be picked up and it was good money for just three weeks' work. I've heard of that thing happening before in Hollywood, but given HBO's pedigree and the fact that professionals are involved I find this hard to credit.

      Quote  Reply

  111. Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    There is a big difference between Ehle and Headey, however, which is that Ehle has not done regular, episodic, multi-year television before, whilst Headey just came off the back of two years on SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES, filmed on the much harsher even than HBO American network television schedule. In addition, Cersei is not as prominent a character as Catelyn and has considerably less screentime, particularly in Season 1 (it'll rise in S2, when she's in every other Tyrion and Sansa chapter).

    In short, Headey has more recent experience in TV work and likely knows how this will pan out, and will likely not find it daunting (in fact, compared to SCC she may find it relatively relaxing, not having to do fight scenes, work out or being pretty much the main character).

      Quote  Reply

  112. Phedre
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arch

    If this is your Catelyn Stark then you are on something.

      Quote  Reply

  113. Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    Okay, dinks. We're getting into Tamzin Merchant territory with all the snide comments regarding her looks. You haven't seen her as Catelyn

      Quote  Reply

  114. Coltaine777
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    I wish everyone would chill out…if she's good enough for DD , she good enough for me

      Quote  Reply

  115. Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    Hell, you haven't even seen Jennifer Ehle as Catelyn, so how can you even know who's better? Catelyn Tully may have been a beauty, but Catelyn Stark is a mother of five and is clearly past her youth. Watch the damned series first, then if she stinks up the joint, pass your judgments.

    Some of this stuff is truly in bad taste; I might expect it from Twilight pre-teens, but not you all. Quit kneejerking, and try to treat Fairley fairly.

      Quote  Reply

  116. Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    She just seems so old and homely.

    Oh, and judging by the Tudors season 4 preview, Tamzin is gonna be HOT!

      Quote  Reply

  117. Posted March 19, 2010 at 11:57 pm | Permalink

    From the speed of this, it is likely, even probably, that Fairley was one of the other actresses who auditioned for Cat, and was probably the producers' second choice after Ehle. Given the number of excellent 35-50-year-old-odd actresses who must have gone for the role (seriously, roles like this for women of that age are not as commonplace as they should be), Fairley must have been very good indeed in her audition to get the role.

    And people do need to remember that actors, producers and HBO execs are reading this blog. When they see the extremely uninformed and unintelligent responses to some of the posts here, they must wonder why on earth they are bothering with the project in the first place. If the TV series starts and the actors suck, that is the time it's fair to bitch about it, certainly not before a single frame of footage has been shown and in Fairley's case, even shot.

      Quote  Reply

  118. Phedre
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:05 am | Permalink

    Chill out, guys. There is nothing wrong with pointing out that the actress cast seems quite a bit older and more worn than the character. And so what if Catelyn Stark is a mother of five who dares to be out of her twenties? Being a mother suddenly means being unattractive now?

      Quote  Reply

  119. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:11 am | Permalink

    Actually, the producers reading this blog was exactly why I was commenting. I'm truly not the kind to bitch and moan for no purpose, but I think if the actor cast doesn't seem to match the character for me, I have the right to give that feedback. If Sylvester Stallone was cast for the role of Ned, then would people then be entitled to object? We have a difference in perception of suitability, that's all.

    I don't know Fairley, but from all I've seen, she simply doesn't fit, and I think I have the right to make that known. We don't have to agree first with everything the powers that be do in order to voice our opinions. If the TV series starts and the actors suck, you do realize that it's too late then to have a new actress? Maybe that's why people want to give all their feedback now?

      Quote  Reply

  120. Emily
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

    Steve, I don't think that's a very good photo of Michelle Fairley, actually. You can't see her eyes at all and the maid hair makes her look a bit old. It is, however, a nice shot of Kelly Reilly as Desdemona. I'm afraid the red hair will make people think that *SHE* is playing Cat.

      Quote  Reply

  121. LemonBoy
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:17 am | Permalink

    I think her age and look is fine considering Ned Stark is being played by Sean Bean.

      Quote  Reply

  122. Logan
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:19 am | Permalink

    Aww, this makes me sad. I was really excited to see Ehle in GoT. I'm not sure what else to say. I may not have seen Ehle play Catelyn, but she's been Catelyn in my head for a long time, now. This will be hard to adjust to. Sad day.

      Quote  Reply

  123. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:22 am | Permalink

    I'm sad to read this bit of news. I thought Ehle was perfect casting for Catelyn. While Fairley is not anywhere close to how I see Catelyn, I'm sure I can live with this bit of casting. Here's hoping there aren't too many more casting shake-ups in our show's future.

      Quote  Reply

  124. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:23 am | Permalink

    I'm worried about her look (especially age-wise), but not her acting skills. Watch that youtube clip, she seems to be a very good actor. I'm sure her acting will be fine. In fact, it's quite possible that her audition was even better than Ehle's in terms of acting, but they may have originally gone with Ehle because of the look.

      Quote  Reply

  125. Rory
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    I think this picture gives a better idea of how she might look in the role
    http://i3.digiguide.com/up/0809/634265-LarkRise-1

      Quote  Reply

  126. Jonathan
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:28 am | Permalink

    I don't want to sound ageist, but I can't even begin to fathom why they would cast a 45 year old as Catelyn, who I believe is 29 or 30 at the start of GoT.

      Quote  Reply

  127. eugenyi
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:28 am | Permalink

    is make-up
    this photo is better

    http://www.hotflick.net/flicks/1998_Hideous_Kinky

      Quote  Reply

  128. Phedre
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    But that's from 12 years ago. The clip on westeros.org is also from 13 years ago.

      Quote  Reply

  129. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:31 am | Permalink

    I'm starting to wonder whether the majority of posters on this blog are teenaged boys.

    Personally, I have no problem with her 'look' (in fact I prefer it to Ehle). Besides which, HBO obviously knows better than us.

      Quote  Reply

  130. Imzadi
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:48 am | Permalink

    That's Julia Sawalha picture in "Lark Rise to Candleford". She played Lydia Bennet in Pride & Prejudice. Sister to Jennifer Ehles character.

      Quote  Reply

  131. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:49 am | Permalink

    Seriously, replace all the "old looking" photos in the article with some of these "younger looking" ones people have found. It's amazing what make-up can do, but I'd like to think that this is like Charlize Therion getting crap for getting cast as Milf with only pictures from "Monster" as a public reference.

    that said, I would think that this actress really would put up at least one recent glamor shot up on her IMDB site if she's going for these sorts of roles rather than the plethora of doughty looking pics she's got right now.

      Quote  Reply

  132. Who Is Jacopo Belbo
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:57 am | Permalink

    man i miss tara and true blood.

    "oh my god. i am kidding you pathetic racist. i know y'all are stupid but do you have to be that stupid."

      Quote  Reply

  133. Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:05 am | Permalink

    Good catch! That's her. Here's a direct link to the time in the video where she is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL914ymt9wY#t=01m0

      Quote  Reply

  134. Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:05 am | Permalink

    Good catch! That's her. Here's a direct link to the time in the video where she is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL914ymt9wY#t=01m0

      Quote  Reply

  135. Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:08 am | Permalink

    Actually, she's around 35 or 36 in GoT.

      Quote  Reply

  136. Phedre
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:09 am | Permalink

    This is her thirteen years ago. The lady's plenty nice looking, but she just seems _old_ now.

      Quote  Reply

  137. Phedre
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:17 am | Permalink

    That's Ned, man. His wife is like 33.

      Quote  Reply

  138. Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:34 am | Permalink

    From what you've seen?

    What have you seen? One or two clips, a few pictures.

    For the record, you can't change anything now anyway. As if they'll go "Oh my god, look at all the negative comments! Michelle, you're fired!" Your statement makes no sense.

    This is bordering on ridiculous. And it's always actresses. It's just sad.

      Quote  Reply

  139. Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:36 am | Permalink

    Okay, people are getting grumpy…

    I brought hugs and cookies for everyone :)

    WHile I'm disappointed that Ehle was lost (I had really gotten used to the idea of her as Cat), I 100% trust D&D in the decision. As Adam said, she must have tested very well in order to be cast. I'm not worried. You people are all entitled to your opinions, but remember that this is a human being with feelings we're talking about here. Keep it civil and respectful, please!

    Congrats to Michelle Fairley on the role!

      Quote  Reply

  140. Phedre
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:50 am | Permalink

    What else am I supposed to go on? You're not worried, that's great. Can't I be?

      Quote  Reply

  141. Who Is Jacopo Belbo
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:55 am | Permalink

    let me guess:

    In THIS

    they haven't cast the hot chick that looks like Julie Delpy but instead the old chick that looks like grizzled Joan Allen

      Quote  Reply

  142. Phedre
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:57 am | Permalink

    Sorry, ignore this comment. Your right, things are getting hostile. I still don't agree with the casting, but I'm not going to make a huge deal out of it.

      Quote  Reply

  143. Posted March 20, 2010 at 2:04 am | Permalink

    Jennifer ehle was perfect. So this basically sucks! She seemed like the perfect mother of mothers. Which was what i was hoping for with Catelyn…

    So this… is… I dunno… What is this?

      Quote  Reply

  144. Nat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    No matter what you think, this comment wins.

      Quote  Reply

  145. Posted March 20, 2010 at 2:07 am | Permalink

    50-year-old Sean Bean (playing a character originally 35)
    46-year-old Mark Addy (ditto)
    41-year-old Peter Dinklage (playing a character originally 26)

    If you're ageist, you should have given up hope for this show way back with the first casting announcements.

    (The reason they aged people up, by the by, is probably because the actor[s] they wanted for Ned were in their 40's and 50's, plus they wanted to age up some of the younger characters like Robb and Jon I imagine.)

      Quote  Reply

  146. Posted March 20, 2010 at 2:08 am | Permalink

    I guess it could have been MUCH worse….

    Dinklage could have been replaced… You ever know. Actually… We still don't know what GRRM meant about the. "can't tell you thingy, yet…"

      Quote  Reply

  147. Posted March 20, 2010 at 2:30 am | Permalink

    Oh Shit! Dinklage HAS been replaced! By Danny Freakin DeVito!!

    Source

      Quote  Reply

  148. Pat
    Posted March 19, 2010 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    sorry spelt it wrong too . thinking of something else (overreactive).
    but yeah, its just misleading

      Quote  Reply

  149. marvin
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:01 am | Permalink

    I can definitely see Fairley as Catelyn. Methinks she looks more fitting for the role than Ehle does. Ehle has dainty and lovely look, while I pictured Catelyn more tough and handsome than pretty. I had actually thought casting of Cersei and Catelyn might as well be switched. In the books Cersei was described repeatedly as being lovely, Catelyn as fair and handsome. Not that Heady is not beautiful.
    Congratulation to Ms. Fairley(fingers crossed)

      Quote  Reply

  150. Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:07 am | Permalink

    Look. It may be a bit harsh to say, but she *is* probably 10 years too old for the role.

    It has nothing to do with her looks. It is her age. People point to the middle aged Sean Bean, and the fact that Cat has teenagers and say that 45 years old is fine. But, the book has medieval-fantasy setting. Women got married younger, and had kids younger than today. Even with a 15 year old, Cat ought to be in her mid-thirties.

      Quote  Reply

  151. Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:33 am | Permalink

    Sorta surprised at all the negativity. While I'm disappointed they couldn't keep Ehle, I think Fairley, just based on looks, will make a great Catelyn. Actually she looks more like I imagined Cat than Ehle did.

    To the people who think she is ugly based on a couple pictures from productions where she was obviously made to look haggard, stop being so reactionary. In the black and white ones from that Harry Potter website, she looks quite pretty, despite not being all made up. I'm sure once the make-up department transforms her into Catelyn, she will look even better.

      Quote  Reply

  152. LadyB
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:48 am | Permalink

    I have to agree, I don't mean to be mean, certainly I'm no looker. I don't mean it as an insult to Miss Fairley at all, and I don't find her ugly in the least, but she does seem a little miscast, and I don't think the fact that she is a mother changes anything, given the setting. But watch and see, in a year or so when we see that first episode we may all find that there's nothing to worry about. What we need now is some photoshoots, not just of Fairley but the whole cast. That'll give us something to be excited about.

      Quote  Reply

  153. Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:50 am | Permalink

    I have to say I'm not looking forward to the Shae casting. Anything short of Megan Fox and Jessica Alba combined in the looks department and this place is going to be nigh unreadable. I'll be swinging the ban hammer like I'm Robert wielding his war hammer on the Trident.

      Quote  Reply

  154. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:54 am | Permalink

    Don't worry about Alfie Allen. Sure, he doesn't quite LOOK like the Theon I imagined… but I think he'll do wonderfully. You'll see.

      Quote  Reply

  155. Steve
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:59 am | Permalink

    did you notice who is playing Dany?

      Quote  Reply

  156. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:00 am | Permalink

    LOL! Just give us a minute to absorb this! We'll come around….

    In addition to acting abilities, Ehle just seemed like the perfect Catelyn. She really looked like she could have been the mother of Sophie and Maisie, and it kinda sucks to have to erease that mental image.

    I, like most other people here, i'm sure, will give this new Catelyn a chance. But let us grieve for a little while first….

      Quote  Reply

  157. Steve
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:02 am | Permalink

    Treat Fairley fairly? Was that really necessary?

    Boobs.

      Quote  Reply

  158. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:02 am | Permalink

    I think people are more worried about age than looks, at this point. I'll agree with you, I was never 100% sold on Ehle myself. She didn't look exactly like the Cat I pictured. I think the Cat in my head was something of a mix between Ehle and Fairley, actually.

    And I watched the youtube clip of Fairley, and I immediately got the sense of a confident and capable actress. So I'm not worried about the acting at all. In fact, she seems a lot "stronger" than Ehle, which will serve the character well.

    I'm just worried about age, and wrinkles, etc. Hopefully we'll get more news/info/photos soon, to get a better idea of what's going on.

      Quote  Reply

  159. Steve
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:12 am | Permalink

    Maybe it has a everything to do with that picture on this article up there. The picture is shocking, along with the shocking news. She looks like a mousy soccer mom. Additionally, people have no problems with a 20 year old Catelyn. So why bother arguing? The whole think is a prank.

      Quote  Reply

  160. Emily
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:15 am | Permalink

    I think she's lovely. Her cheekbones are beautiful. (Quite similar to Sophie Turner actually. http://sophie-turner.com/gallery/displayimage.php… ) And she has the blue eyes.

      Quote  Reply

  161. Steve
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:19 am | Permalink

    My last cent… You guys might want to reconsider how you display information. A large details like the crappy Google Image #2 as the headshot to introduce readers to the replacement of a beloved pre-season cast member is likely to have some ill reactions among the rabble. Put things in a more positive light and then you will be sorta surprised that people will react more smoothly to it.

      Quote  Reply

  162. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:25 am | Permalink

    I hope you are right, and also about Fairley. I just think it's getting over the top the way you can't even voice anything negative about this series at all. I'm no fan of the nastier comments here, but I stopped participating in anything to do with this series because I always know that I'll have a pack of defenders on my back if I ever rock the boat. People can be happy about this or not, and both are okay. Let's leave each other to have our own opinions.

      Quote  Reply

  163. Blue
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:32 am | Permalink

    Break my heart…

      Quote  Reply

  164. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:42 am | Permalink

    I have to admit, my first reaction was disappointment to this news, but that's only because I am a big Ehle fan. Fairley is an unknown to me, so I dont have an opinion, really, other than high hopes she will recreate Cat for us in a believable way.

    Seeing the initial photos provided of her had me agreeing that she looks much older in those photos than the Cat I envision, but … they're production photos. I did some of my own searching and found these for, perhaps, some new perspecitve regarding her appearance?

      Quote  Reply

  165. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:43 am | Permalink

    I just hope that if there is more "bad news," they give us some good news along with it, or this place might riot.

      Quote  Reply

  166. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:44 am | Permalink
  167. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:56 am | Permalink

    I agree with this. The headline and the photo, all at once, is too much of a shock.

      Quote  Reply

  168. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:00 am | Permalink

    I'm slowly warming up to her. She looks much stronger than Ehle. I can definitely imagine this woman arresting Tyrion, confronting Jaime through prison bars, and arguing with Stannis. With hair and makeup and costume, she may end up looking more like Cat than Ehle ever did.

    (I still worry a bit about her age, though…).

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/14/article

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b333/Lithuin/fa

      Quote  Reply

  169. Coltaine777
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:22 am | Permalink

    I am just laughing to myself at all these posters who are unhappy with this choice because Of her looks…..thank God you morons are not in charge of casting….or else we would have Adrian Paul and others of his Ilk involved in the show……nobody has seen her audition but yet many are calling it a mistake….give me a break !…::..relax ….get on board or get lost …

      Quote  Reply

  170. anon
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:22 am | Permalink

    Sigh, I was hoping Ehle would've added a softness Catelyn's character needed… Oh well, I guess. I was soooo looking forward to a 'Pride and Prejudice and Zombies' thing too.

      Quote  Reply

  171. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:26 am | Permalink

    Why would Catelyn's character need "a softness"? She is what she is, the way GRRM wrote her, and I don't think there's much softness there.

      Quote  Reply

  172. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:27 am | Permalink

    Oh, and she bears a resemblance to Arya/Maisie, doesn't she? Sure, it's the wrong daughter, but…

      Quote  Reply

  173. Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:39 am | Permalink

    You mean from the the dozen or so recent pictures we've seen of her? Right.

    I'll withhold my judgment until I see recent film of her. I don't trust pictures so much. I do trust the casting director for the series…so….I am not worried.

      Quote  Reply

  174. Who Is Jacopo Belbo
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:44 am | Permalink

    i am guessing they will just turn esme's "red headed whore" into shae. or at least hoping so. everybody loves esme. this place would lose its collecitve sh*t in a good way if they did that.

    not to mention there is a difference between seeing pictures of an actress in which they look quite old and haggard and questioning their physical suitability for a role and desiring plastic hollywood eye candy.

      Quote  Reply

  175. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 2:14 am | Permalink

    I respect that you have a different opinion. But I haven't said anything disrespectful about Ms. Fairley, only that I don't think she fits, so stop trying to micromanage other fans. That happens way too much with this series. You can make your point about not changing the cast with far less rudeness. I'm not responsible for the behaviors of other fans either, I didn't say anything nasty about Tamzin Merchant or whoever else you're referring to. You want to know who my other misgiving is? Alfie Allen, not an actress.

      Quote  Reply

  176. Phedre
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 7:17 am | Permalink

    Man, seriously. I'm getting used to the idea of Fairley but you all were thinking that its either black or white. Nobody wanted a supermodel.

      Quote  Reply

  177. Posted March 20, 2010 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    Man, I just started to go through the books again about a month ago and in my mind's eye Caetlyn looked like Ehle… Now I need to reprogram my brain.

      Quote  Reply

  178. Posted March 20, 2010 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    This is a bad news to me. Ehle is a beautiful and terrific actress. She has a stellar stage career (two Tonys) and she had the perfect look for Cat.
    Fairley seems too old for Catelyn and she's a total unknown. However, if she's a half talented as Ehle, she'll be fine.

      Quote  Reply

  179. Daniel
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    Although it sucks balls that the reality of TV means changes are made on the fly. I think the new Strk Woman looks fly and starkish to the max… Stark you all stark! STARK.. trolls beware starks is following

      Quote  Reply

  180. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    I'm sure she'll have makeup caked on her for the role and will look a bit younger. Have you ever SEEN most of the Hollywood actresses without makeup? Many of them look very plain and aged without it. Her makeup artists will do fine, I'm sure, to make her "fair and handsome" as Cat is supposed to be.

    Just wait and see. Hate to say it folks, but after having 5 kids most women, even those who started out as very beautiful, aren't going to look like they're 25 and perky any more.

      Quote  Reply

  181. SA_Avenger
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    what worries me is the feast scene, that one must have been costly so I hope they can avoid redoing it, otherwhise it may be for the best, we'll wait an d see

      Quote  Reply

  182. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    In that role she was playing a severe alcholic (about to drop dead from liver failure) who was ten years older than herself. Probably not the best look for her.

      Quote  Reply

  183. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Your comments are fair enough, and I think there is plenty of scope for constructive criticism of the choices. That said, people must acknowledge that they haven't seen the auditions, they haven't seen the performances filmed so far for the pilot and they don't know what direction the TV series is going to go in with changes to characters and storylines, which may necessitate very different casting. And in this particular case, virtually no-one has seen the actress in other performances, a few brief YouTube clips aside.

      Quote  Reply

  184. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    I had similar reservations about Alfie Allen until I met him and discussed the character with him in Belfast. He left me in no doubt that he gets Theon and the character and can play him well.

      Quote  Reply

  185. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, that's Julia Sawalha as a regular in LARK RISE. Michelle Fairley was in LARK RISE as well as a guest star (in Season 2, Episode 10). I was trying to find a picture of her in period costume but couldn't find any.

      Quote  Reply

  186. Posted March 20, 2010 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Catelyn's age is not directly given in the books. 33 is at the lower end (making her 18 when she married Ned) of estimates.

    Given the 15-year aging up of Ned and Tyrion and the 10-year aging up of Robert, Jaime and Cersei, similarly aging up Cat makes sense.

      Quote  Reply

  187. dimensionallyT
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    The person in that picture isn't Fairley, it is Ali White the writer of a play she was in. Hover over the pics in the link and it is clear that this woman is not the same as Fairley. http://www.bbc.co.uk/northernireland/drama/radio/

      Quote  Reply

  188. Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Nice catch. I updated the post with a photo that I'm pretty sure is Fairley.

      Quote  Reply

  189. dimensionallyT
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    Yep, that looks like her. Fast work! Back to lurking now ;)

      Quote  Reply

  190. Roger
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    She's not supposed to look like a Stark. She was born a Tully, ferchrissakes!

      Quote  Reply

  191. Roger
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Bear in mind that she is of the nobility, so she wouldn't exactly be called on to do any hard labour.

      Quote  Reply

  192. Chris
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    lmao great post!

      Quote  Reply

  193. Roger
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Oddly enough, the Dark Sword Miniature rendition of Catelyn appears to have more in common with Fairley than Ehle:

    http://www.darkswordminiatures.com/gallery/GRRMli

    Mere coincidence or oddly prophetic?

      Quote  Reply

  194. Posted March 20, 2010 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Phew, thanks for the catch.

      Quote  Reply

  195. Posted March 20, 2010 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    I don't care much about the actress who will play Catelyn, but I have to say that this one is definitely not nice looking for the role.__She' s Northern Irish, I guess is going to come in cheaper than Ehle.

      Quote  Reply

  196. Steve B
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Lordy. Just wait, you'll see. A year from now, and all of this will have seemed like a giant dustup over nothing.

      Quote  Reply

  197. Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    I noted that dany is perfect. Quit trolling my friend

      Quote  Reply

  198. Posted March 20, 2010 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    Having had time to accept the change, I'm really looking forward to seeing Michelle Fairley as Catelyn. I think I remember her in Larkrise (shame there's no clips on YouTube) and like what I see of her in the clips online. I was a bit concerned I'd keep thinking of Lizzy Bennett when watching Jennifer as PnP is one of my favourites.

    Sure all will come good. I guess it was inevitable that there would be adjustments to the pilot.

      Quote  Reply

  199. LaughingSkull
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    I don't mind the replacement. In fact, I think Fairley looks more like Catelyn to me than Ehle did.

    As for the comments about her age, it's just how growing up in Northern Ireland makes you look. You see a lot, you age quicker.

      Quote  Reply

  200. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, but part of the impact of UnCat is that she has to be almost a complete 180° turn from the Cat we had known before. She can't look older than her years and world weary the whole time. Even when she falls into depression after Bran's fall, she eventually collects herself and is back in action traveling around Westeros, she's not broken yet.

      Quote  Reply

  201. Tre
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    While I am sad to lose Ehle, because I thought she was perfect for the role, perhaps she will be able to come back and work as Lysa Tully! Now wouldn't that be awesome?! That way we would get to see her, but she would get a smaller, yet more deranged role, something to really show off her acting chops.

    I dunno, I am having a hard time with her departure, because I really do think she is great, so I am trying to cope by seeing her placed in the show as someone else :P

      Quote  Reply

  202. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Eh, as much as I like the HP movies, I think we're comparing apples and oranges here. Each project has its internal consistency.

      Quote  Reply

  203. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    There's also other good pics of her. I like these two:
    Michelle as Ann Best
    Michelle in The Weir (1998)

      Quote  Reply

  204. Crystal
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    :(

    Love Jennifer Ehle. Was REALLY looking forward to seeing her as Catelyn. Sad, sad, sad.

      Quote  Reply

  205. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Except that imo, in a medieval setting (and setting book canon aside which places Cat in her mid 30's), it's actually more likely for a woman to start having babies early on rather than the opposite.

      Quote  Reply

  206. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    She shouldn't look 25 either. She should look mid-thirties.

      Quote  Reply

  207. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    this is exactly right. You didn't even have to say "imo" because, it isn't opinion, it is fact.

    Women used to get married, and started having kids a lot younger than today.

      Quote  Reply

  208. Hana
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    This will be a tough mental adjustment, but in another year when the show finally rolls around I'm sure we'll be just as used to Fairley in the role as we were to Ehle.

    I do like the fact that Fairley has a hardness to her face that Ehle just doesn't have. Ehle did stirke me as a bit twinkling and cute. Even before the major troubles start piling up, Catelyn is a pretty austere and even chilly woman. Makeup and lighting will take care of the age-related concerns at the first part of the series. I think later when she starts looking drawn and weary (and then scary) her face will provide a much more interesting canvas than Ehle's.

    And yes, it's the acting that will carry the day. Faces can be put on and taken off in the blink of an eye in a major production like this.

      Quote  Reply

  209. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    Maybe if you were a peasant. She is suppose to be nobility.

      Quote  Reply

  210. Lady_B
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Like I have said elsewhere (hello westeros.org boarders!), I think Cat is supposed to be attractive in the books. She isn't described as such explicitly, no, but I don't see how you *don't* infer it, especially with the way Sansa is compared to her. Might the sources be biased? No more than Robert and Ned are for Lyanna Stark, and everyone accepts her epic beauty. All the attractive Stark kids look like their mother; Ned is the plain jane here, Cat's the hot one (come on, Tyrion even insinuates as much). In my mind she probably has some age lines and all that, but she still presents really well. Even when she's going through her later adversities, her basic features are still going to be there. Plus I always felt like she's the kind of person where, if you look at her, she always looks fine. Her turmoil is mostly internal, to outward appearances you probably could easily miss it. Even in her darkest moments she's tending to other people's concerns more than they are to hers, she's that kind of person who projects that she is always *fine*.

    When it comes to the casting, I totally agree with the idea that so many considerations factor in to a casting choice that we have to be flexible with the different aspects of a character. We need to prioritize, I'm all for that. With respect to Michelle Fairley in particular, I think it's important to allow for the fact that we really just don't have a very good look at her yet. Her recent images and clips seem to all be from a particularly harrowed role. I myself think she looks nice, just older than I would have imagined. I like that she has gravity, though I'm still holding out for that iron spine thing.

    The only thing that kind of gets me seeing red is the Mom Logic. Guys, there is no motherly look, moms are simply women who have given birth. They still have their own personalities, they don't become a new species. A beatific and calm "motherly" look is what is known as a stereotype; moms have to look like good women, like the Virgin Mary, while evil women have another (usually a more powerful) look. That's media stereotyping. Let's shoot for something else since we have the chance, yes? Also with regard to the fact that being a mother of five is supposed to age Catelyn or make her less attractive — I would then expect this logic to then apply to Cersei, mother of three, Ellaria and Alerie, mothers of four.

    Why do I make such a fuss about this? I hate the idea of the character being put into a "mom box". She has a mother's story, but it would be the height of predictability to see her the stereotypic Mom of the story considering GRRM tries to make his representation of mothers more fleshed out than such basic stereotypes. Catelyn is a woman who happens to be a mother, she still has her own personality — staunch, vigilant, aristocratic. Cast her based on her personality.

    BTW, Lindsay Duncan, who played Servilia in Rome, definitely looked like an older woman, but she still had a pretty regal and proud cast, which is what counted for the character. It's not a matter of the particular number of the age, and Lindsay Duncan doesn't look like Cindy Crawford either.

      Quote  Reply

  211. Lady_B
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    Whoa, long comment is long! Sorry!

      Quote  Reply

  212. Posted March 20, 2010 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    So i suppose the reason Ehle is out is that she simply didn't have the time filming the first season.

    How common is this, for an actor/actress to sign the contract and all that, make a good performance and then.. the whole thing just doesn't happen anyway?

      Quote  Reply

  213. Posted March 20, 2010 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    I would think she only signed for the pilot, the rest wasn't fully settled yet. It couldn't have been, not before the green light.

      Quote  Reply

  214. Posted March 20, 2010 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    That seems weird/risky to make a pilot full of actors who may not be there for the full season. I would have thought they could still sign a contract that stated IF the greenlight happened, they would do the whole thing.

      Quote  Reply

  215. Inês
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    Not really feeling it. Hear Me Roar must have seen the same pictures we all saw, I wonder what he means by "She has the right looks, as far as I am concerned" …

      Quote  Reply

  216. Posted March 20, 2010 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Seconded. Even if Martin doesn't sexualize her to the extent he does with Cersei and Dany, there are still plenty of indicators that point to her being an attractive woman. Although Ehle didn't look like my mental image of Cat, I thought she was the right "type". Fairley… doesn't fit in that mold imo.

      Quote  Reply

  217. Posted March 20, 2010 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    I never said the contrary. Cat's age vs Robb's age would mean she would have had her first baby in her late 20s to mid-30s and that IS very late for a medieval setting.
    However, I was only addressing Paul's issue with Cat's age vs Rickon's age, and while it is true that not many women survived her forties, it is quite possible that those who did survive still had babies at that age, for the lack of birth control. In fact, many women probably died in their 40s while giving birth to a 4th, 5th or 6th baby. Still, families weren't that big because of a high rate of stillbirth and child death.
    So what I am saying is that if Robb is 15 y.o. in the series, then Cat shouldn't be more than 35 y.o. IMO. However, if you forget Robb and only focus on the fact that Cat has a 3 y.o. toddler (Rickon), as was the subject of Paul's original post, than in this matter I wouldn't have a problem with her being older up to her early 50s.

      Quote  Reply

  218. Miss
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 8:46 pm | Permalink

    And really, Catelyn is going to have the best medical care that anyone could find in Westeros. I'm thinking if she can rebound so well to have five healthy children in these times, and not one miscarriage that we heard of, this issue of having five babies should make no difference to her looks.

      Quote  Reply

  219. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    I agree, Tamzin looks pretty hot in that preview. I think she's one of those people who looks better or worse depending on lighting, makeup, etc.

      Quote  Reply

  220. Lex
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    LOL, poor Ali White. I hope she doesn't read this blog.

      Quote  Reply

  221. Zeros
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    No offense but… in the looks, Ehle was much more fitting. this actress is MUCH ehm… worse-looking to say the least :S

      Quote  Reply

  222. Posted March 20, 2010 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Right, and the Maesters are a wild card. They seem to be well in advance of most Medieval medical practitioners.

      Quote  Reply

  223. Posted March 20, 2010 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    Nice update!

      Quote  Reply

  224. Posted March 21, 2010 at 1:11 am | Permalink

    She looks fine. Stop yer bellyaching.

      Quote  Reply

  225. Meg
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 3:07 am | Permalink

    i like her, she looks more mature and worried than Ehle. my only concern – aren't they going to have to re-film a lot of stuff? how much will this set them back in terms of cost and time? how do other actors feel when they have to re-shoot scenes months later?

      Quote  Reply

  226. sjwenings
    Posted March 20, 2010 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    My concern is that some other actor will announce his/her leave if it’s true that they haven’t already signed contracts for the whole season.

    To think we still may not be guaranteed to see Dinklage as Tyrion…

      Quote  Reply

  227. Lex
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 4:04 am | Permalink

    Does an actor (i.e. Ehle) get penalized in any way for something like this? I mean, does HBO just eat the cost, or what?

    Personally I'm guessing they'll use some clever editing, and probably won't have to re-film the feast scene. They may just re-film any close-ups of Caetlyn. From afar, and in costume, it may be difficult to spot the different.

      Quote  Reply

  228. Aoede
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 4:55 am | Permalink

    Don't apologize; you make good points. Unfortunately, I doubt that many will bother reading them — or, having read them, think on your ideas rather than instinctively react to defend their own preconceptions.

      Quote  Reply

  229. Posted March 21, 2010 at 6:32 am | Permalink

    Having just done a quick google search on her name, I think she has the right sort of look for the part. I have to admit though that Catelyn Stark was never a character I had a strong mental image of…

      Quote  Reply

  230. Lady_B
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 8:02 am | Permalink

    Well it's worth a shot! I think we could stand to be a little more courteous to Ms. Fairley here, but I also think it's not really all that cool to go, Well of *course* Catelyn shouldn't look all that beautiful, she's The Mom. It's not that important for the plot, but all the same, it kind of falls into these old stereotypes where good women are not seductive and not powerful or strong, while bad women are seductive and quite powerful. There's just a lot of bad implications there, and dichotomies are a really old old way of stereotyping women.

    I think part of the reason people are reacting badly is because there's this apprehension that they are going to make Cersei the sexy powerful one and Catelyn the nondescript demure one, and that's utterly playing to stereotype. Whereas in the books, Cersei was the one who came off as sweet and gentle to all outward appearances, and Catelyn seemed to give off the impressive and striking air.

    So I definitely think we should all keep an open mind here about the casting, plus GRRM doesn't sexualize Catelyn as much in the books, to be sure, and I don't think it's the most important thing about her character. At the same time, try to understand where the anxieties are coming from. It's not just all about teenage fanboys wanting hot women to drool over. The justifications a lot of people were giving were just a little disappointing, though I definitely think there are plenty of other reasons that we should all just chill out and wait and see.

      Quote  Reply

  231. hector19
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 8:09 am | Permalink

    It doesn't really matter how the actors "feel," they just gotta do what they gotta do. They reshot a third of Back to the Future several weeks into production when they replaced Eric Stoltz with Michael J Fox. For this they only need to reshoot a few scenes.

      Quote  Reply

  232. Posted March 21, 2010 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    I had some severe reservations as well before. Someone on the topic before this told me that most of the pictures you find on google are from a film where she plays an alcoholic with several hard years behind her. So we probably shouldn't get to put off by them. There are some where you can see her kind of natural beauty in them as well.
    I am going to trust HBO on this. Even though I'd have loved to see Ms. Bennett as Cat- UnCat… ;)

      Quote  Reply

  233. Posted March 21, 2010 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    concur

      Quote  Reply

  234. Posted March 21, 2010 at 8:34 am | Permalink

    You guys are just too funny!
    Kelly Reilly is beautiful to no end, for sure, but a biiit too young, and a biiit tooo beautiful. She could have worked asCersei for me.. But she does not look a bit maternal.

      Quote  Reply

  235. Posted March 21, 2010 at 8:45 am | Permalink

    Alright people. Let's try and keep it civil in here, both of you.
    Concurr about the cussing, but would also like to point out that IQ in no part is related to the knowledge of the english language.
    There are many people on this blog, like me, that are not from an englishspeaking country. Therefore the english abilities vary a lot. I can say that for me my english looks ok most of the time, but an english speaker from birth may think differently.
    So let's keep the putting people down because they do not stand up to your standards to a minimum shall we?!

    A disappointing fact of life is that in any country people not being able to speak the native tongue as good as people who were raised in it and who's family lived there for generations are easily considered stupid! A REALLY disappointing fact of life and humans in general.

      Quote  Reply

  236. Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    Yes, and we have to keep in mind that most of Catelyns acting goes on insede – off course some of this has to be altered from the books, but she is a cautious person well accustomed to how the society in Westeros works.

      Quote  Reply

  237. Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    acting would make more sense if I'd written actions… or whichever
    I hope you get my meaning, cause this comment was a bit fuzzy

      Quote  Reply

  238. Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    true, though she is not as tough as the notheners… being from Riverrun..

      Quote  Reply

  239. Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    *northeners – sorry

      Quote  Reply

  240. Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    Exactly.. I'd say most of ANY women look a bit haggard wihtout makeup on them(congrats to those who don't) – from the age of arounf 25 and up… Which many men do not realise… It's all a facade men…

      Quote  Reply

  241. Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:18 am | Permalink

    in all fairness it was the black and white picture before that one that first irked all the "haggard" responses, not the ali white one. the first picture is one of the first to pop up when you google michelle fairley, where, as it turns out, she plays an old haggard alcoholic… go figure…

      Quote  Reply

  242. Lady_B
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    Heh, I can see the mix between Ehle and Fairley thing! I liked Ehle's spirit and I like Fairley's gravity. By their powers combined …

      Quote  Reply

  243. Posted March 21, 2010 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Typical Hollywood practice is to sign actors definitively for the pilot and then give options on another five to seven years on top of that, and they have to keep their diaries clear for when filming is due to start IF the show is picked up.

    In practice, this is not practical for most actors who basically double-book themselves to keep the bills being paid if the pilot isn't picked up. They will usually let the other project directors know they might have to pull out due to this prior commitment, however.

    One possibility we haven't floated yet is that Ehele agreed to do THRONES before starting this new theatre production in New York (close to her home) and enjoyed it so much that she had second thoughts about the huge commitment of THRONES.

      Quote  Reply

  244. Posted March 21, 2010 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    They will have signed contracts and options for an indefinite period. Remember back when the casting sides were being discussed the information for Jaime specifically said that the actor would be contracted for several episodes of Season 1 and a couple in Season 2 before becoming a regular in Seasons 3, 4 and possibly later. GRRM said on his blog that the Jaime contract negotiations had been tough to work out.

    Technically, Ehle may have breached her contract to withdraw from the production. However, at the same time TV companies are generally aware that shit happens and life sometimes interferes, that's why they have second choices standing by in case actors drop out. In addition, Ehle may have mentioned to the producers that she was not certain of being able to do the series due to other issues and they may have wanted her in the role enough to say they wanted to go on with the pilot but have a back-up choice specifically standing by for this contingency.

    Basically, we need more information before we can come to any conclusions, but one thing that can be counted on is that other actors are unlikely to drop out of the project due to the contracts involved.

      Quote  Reply

  245. deepseaswimming
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Michelle Fairey on Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMABaMyZOrc&ha… @ 10:30 mark

      Quote  Reply

  246. Posted March 21, 2010 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    Probably is that. Since, like Adam Whitehead pointed out, most of the pictures are from a movie where she plays an old alcoholic ten years her senior. :)

      Quote  Reply

  247. Posted March 21, 2010 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Yup, she looks pretty good there without the aging-up make-up from BEST, not too different age-wise in appearance from Ehle (I think people need to remember that PRIDE & PREJUDICE was 15 years ago as well). Change her hair colour and she could be a very good Cat, and acting-wise in that scene she is nailing the tortured strength element that is really needed for Cat.

      Quote  Reply

  248. T.E.Q.
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:18 am | Permalink

    What does it mean to look maternal? Mothers are all kinds of people. Cersei's a mother too, it's one of her biggest traits.

      Quote  Reply

  249. Kurt
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Although my initial reaction was “not positive”, I am less disturbed by the casting change than by HBO’s characterizing it as a “minor tweak”. Ms. Ehle seemed to have the right look, but Ms Fairley may bring a more formidable presence to the role that could contrast nicely with Ms. Headey. The producers seem to have consistently gone for substance over style, so in this, my instinct is to trust them.

    However, as Catelyn is without question the dominant female role in the pilot, I am less trusting of seeing this as a “tweak”. I don’t see how they will be able to pull this off without re-shooting large swaths of the pilot, if not the entire episode. At the risk of stirring up a hornet’s nest, combine this with the attributions of the hated Sourcenator, and they now have an excuse to do just that.

      Quote  Reply

  250. Posted March 21, 2010 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Thats what i initially thought. Thanks.

      Quote  Reply

  251. Posted March 21, 2010 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    To be fair, I'm pretty certain "Sourcenator" was a troll who just made educated guesses on what was happening (perhaps someone from the industry familiar with the process…) and wrote untrue, controversial things here to garner attention and work people up.

      Quote  Reply

  252. Posted March 21, 2010 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Drat! blocked in the US on copyright grounds….

    Can you take a screen shot?

      Quote  Reply

  253. Posted March 21, 2010 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Kind of a moot point in this discussion, considering that Ehle was 41, anyway. I mean, yeah, Fairley's older, but four years is not going to make that much difference here.

      Quote  Reply

  254. Wolf of Dorne
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    Just remember all the characters have been aged 5-10 years in the show. Catelyn is now a 40-years-old MILF who have given birth to five kids in a roll and lives in a Middle Age-like world. Ehle looked cool, but this woman does it too, just a bit different.

    I'll wait until I watch the show to give an opinion about her performance.

      Quote  Reply

  255. deepseaswimming
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    Michelle Fairley was brilliant in Best: His Mother's Son. And she has amazing eyes too! Here's a link to her appearance in 2009 episode of Misfits, fast forward to 10:30 mark
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMABaMyZOrc&ha
    and another Misfits episode at 09:05 mark
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMrr8EY4orM&fe

      Quote  Reply

  256. Posted March 21, 2010 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Interesting post with a lot of good points. I half-disagree on some, though:

    1. I would say that if anyone is "the stereotypic Mom of the story," it's Catelyn. While she does have her own personality deep down, I think it's fair to say that she considers her children to be her #1 priority, and chooses to be a mother over everything else. Granted, her personality does cause her to act more as a fierce defender than the perhaps more stereotypical warm nurturer, but that's also partly the nature of the setting. Looks-wise, though, she should probably be a bit off the stereotype, I suppose. This is something I like more about Fairley than Ehle: Ehle looked a bit gentle for Catelyn, to me, though of course with the right acting those soft looks could have just provided interesting contrast.

    2. "Cast her based on her personality." I have to disagree entirely on that point. It works for casting non-actors in smaller roles, but in casting one of the central characters of the book, the personality of the actor shouldn't come anywhere near the casting director's mind in making a decision. Well, aside from "Will this actor be a major jerk and completely ruin the production?" Then again, I might be taking you too literally, and you meant more along the lines of casting based on acting talent (The personality/ies she's able to portray)

      Quote  Reply

  257. Lady_B
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    1. Well, a lot of things Catelyn does is what any mother of any personality would do, she's protective and she worries. But she isn't gushy with endless nurturing, she isn't taking in orphans left and right. She is definitely no Molly Weasley. No mother would think of much else while her children are in mortal danger, just about all mothers consider their children their #1 priority. I have two, a mother and a stepmother, they're very similar in this regard, and still very different people. I would not cast them with the same actress simply because they're both mothers.

    2. No, I don't mean cast the character based on the actor's personality. Cast an actor who will bring out the character's personality. I just don't see "maternal" as any good kind of personality trait. Look who else is a mother in this story – should Cersei be cast to look maternal? Does she not protect and worry over her children? The only difference is readers put her in the Femme Fatale box and Catelyn has to go in a box too, so she becomes perceived as needing to embody some Mom stereotype.

      Quote  Reply

  258. Posted March 21, 2010 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    To be precise it's THR that called this tweaking …

      Quote  Reply

  259. Posted March 21, 2010 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    I'm kind of disappointed Ehle's left, but not that much. In terms of overall look, Fairley's closer to how I imagined Catelyn, though she does look a bit older. I'm not really familiar with any work by either of them, so I can't give any concrete judgments on acting ability, but unless Fairley actually hadn't already auditioned, they obviously chose Ehle over her before. This basically means we can assume D&D would have preferred Ehle, and I tend to trust their judgment. However, looking back in GRRM's not-a-blog, I note that Catelyn's not one of the roles where he says the chosen actor blew the others out of the water, So I'm not really too concerned…

    Just hope reshooting doesn't push back the schedule any…

      Quote  Reply

  260. Posted March 21, 2010 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    It's also possible that Fairley did just as well as Ehle on her audition, but that they simply chose Ehle because she's more well-known in addition to acting skills.

      Quote  Reply

  261. Lex
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    I'm guessing Fairley may have done just as well (or better) than Ehle in auditions… but they went with Ehle because she was a bigger name, or because she had the better "look".

    If that's true, then Fairley could end up being very awesome indeed.

    Also, by the time the series airs (one year from now) I'm sure we'll be used to picturing Fairley as Cat. Eventually it will be hard to even imagine that Ehle ever had the part.

      Quote  Reply

  262. jack bruce
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

    fairley is a brillaint actor, as quoted by her peers ‘one the best actors in the world’, she does not do PR, her work speaks for its self, i seen fairly on stage many times she always steals the show, playwrites have written plays for , i also heard she was harold pinters favourite actor.

      Quote  Reply

  263. Inês
    Posted March 21, 2010 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Catelyn and Cersei are supposed to be contemporaries, peers and foils. This is pretty obvious from any intelligent reading of the books. Whatever their reasoning for this casting change, I hope they understand this. "Tweaking the matriarch's role" could mean many things, it would have been better if they had been clear from the start.

      Quote  Reply

  264. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 1:20 am | Permalink

    The way I've always seen it is that Cat, while pretty is not quite the looker that Cersei is. It will be interesting to see what they can do with makeup to make Fairley look younger. I don't have a problem with her looks perse, in fact as Cat breaks down her look in some of the previous pics seems to fit. My problem with her is her age. At the beginning of AGoT I've always pictured Cat as "pretty with her best years just behind her". Elhe fit that age perfectly to me. Fairley just seems too far past that age to fit. I'm not suggesting she isn't extremely charming and charasimatic in real life, I just think her age is past Cat's in the way I picture Lady Stark in my head.

    That said, I do think her physical features more closely resemble "my" Cat than Ehle's did.

    Here is to D&D hopefully making the right choice and Mrs. Fairley working her magic to breathe life into a Catelyn that both looks and more importantly acts in the manner that befits Hoster's eldest!

      Quote  Reply

  265. nightwisp1956
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 2:10 am | Permalink

    I think Ms. Fairley will do a good job.

      Quote  Reply

  266. go falcons
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 2:18 am | Permalink

    Also, by the time the series airs a lot more people will know Fairley as Hermione Granger's mother then ever knew Ehle as anything. Pride and Prejudice is a bit of niche fame if you ask me. Harry Potter? That's a whole other level of fame.

    As far as acting talent goes, name me an adult in the Harry Potter movies who can't act.

      Quote  Reply

  267. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:26 am | Permalink

    BTW Winter, speaking of Shae, I was wondering how everyone would take it if the just did away with Shae altogether and used Roz instead as a kind of composite character for Tyrion's hos. I've always suspected something along these lines ever since they changed her name to Roz from RHW. It could be something as minor as a change in dialogue that gave her a name, but it could also possibly hint that D&D want to alter the role a bit?!?

    On the negative end you get some small changes to the order of the plot. This could be minor trouble. I consider myself a purist and would probably prefer Shae to be included in the series, but it could be a relatively small change that could save on casting and really not affect the greater story much. After all if they make the series exactly like the books, it will be fairly predictable to us long-time fans.

      Quote  Reply

  268. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:26 am | Permalink

    On the positive side, you get more Esme! I for one wouldn't mind that. At all…. Not even one smidge!

    What do you think? In order to get more Esme, would you be ok with a rewrite axing Shae? I'm torn down the middle by the proposition.

      Quote  Reply

  269. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:30 am | Permalink

    Cat doesn't start to look that bad, guys. Brienne doesn't even meet her until she's in the middle of her grief and still thinks about how handsome and strong she looked, how smooth her skin was, stuff like that.
    Plus, not being as pretty as Cersei doesn't mean much, if Cersei's so beautiful. It doesn't have to be a constant comparison.

      Quote  Reply

  270. Jasmine
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:45 am | Permalink

    I hope they are still giving Catelyn the attention she deserves. She's supposed to be a beautiful, complicated woman. I'm worried about what this could mean.

      Quote  Reply

  271. Lex
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:05 am | Permalink

    Sounds good to me!

      Quote  Reply

  272. Lex
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:07 am | Permalink

    Unfortunately, I don't think that will happen. I think the ONLY reason they changed the character's name to Ros was because "Red Headed Whore" sounds offensive and insulting to Esme. They HAD to give her a name.

      Quote  Reply

  273. Phedre
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:25 am | Permalink

    HBO should pay you for the PR ;)

      Quote  Reply

  274. Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:44 am | Permalink

    Nice!

      Quote  Reply

  275. Jeremy
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    I loved it when they announced Jennifer Ehle as Cat, before that the only 2 actresses I could see playing the roll were Gillian Anderson and Julianne Moore.
    Cat is a pretty woman even after 5 kids, sorry but this Fairley woman doesn't have the look. Give her a blonde wig and have her play the crazy sister instead.

    very disappointed with this news- very

      Quote  Reply

  276. jeremy
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    that's just fugly

      Quote  Reply

  277. Posted March 22, 2010 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    You were picturing her wrong. She's not a ginger. She just has auburn hair. Which is reddish brown.

      Quote  Reply

  278. Posted March 22, 2010 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    I'd prefer they not rewrite anything. More Esme would make the change tolerable, but messing around with that seems unnecessary. Besides, there's no shortage of brothel scenes they can incorporate Ros into.

      Quote  Reply

  279. Posted March 22, 2010 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    I think Lord Ned's Head's proposition is that Ros would replace Shae: different name, slightly different character, but following the same plot, at least as far as major points. So all that would still happen.

      Quote  Reply

  280. jace bruce
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    thank you mate, i think you absolutly right, she is known in the industry as brilliant brilliant actress

      Quote  Reply

  281. jack bruce
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    listen friend in the industry is very very well know as a brilliant actress if not the best, she does not do PR she's a private person, the picture's that you have seen are all character pictures, she has play writes writing plays for her,she is a very big theater actress

      Quote  Reply

  282. jon jones
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    listen u rude idiot, she is probably is one of the best actors around at moment ask any actor this, i have seen her in many big theater productions in London, she was harold pinters favourite actor, the word in the industry is that they are lucky to get her, she normaly only does Alist complex theater peices

      Quote  Reply

  283. Fleece
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Hey, I think it is time to change the info about Catelyn actress in the Cast and Crew section of the site.

      Quote  Reply

  284. Posted March 22, 2010 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Working on it :)

      Quote  Reply

  285. Posted March 22, 2010 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Intersting. We seem to have jon jones and jack bruce who know Ms Fairley and defend her rather steadfastly. They produce quite strong arguments in her favor.

    I am wondering if they know ASOIAF at all of if they just visited WiC's blog to learn more on GoT after hearing the new that Michelle Fairley had been cast.

    In any case, here is proof that we should try and be more civilised when we express our opinions and worries. Let's remind ourself that WiC is the first GoT information source.

    Thanks to jack bruce and jon jones for your input. If you care to share more information on Fairley, it would be welcome.

      Quote  Reply

  286. Posted March 22, 2010 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Hope that they are two different persons, that they keep civil towards those that doubt Fairley, and that what they say is founded on facts. Feeling positive :)

      Quote  Reply

  287. Posted March 22, 2010 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Yes, one of them could use a little more civility. Agreed.

      Quote  Reply

  288. JackSparrow
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    I'm glad we have some people here defending her. Maybe I tend toward optimism, but I'm excited to see what Mrs. Fairley can do. She seems talented, which are the types of actors/actresses I'd most like to see in programs I'm going to watch. Give me experienced working actors anyday over models.

      Quote  Reply

  289. jack bruce
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    i only joined this forum because i heard fairley is doing this role from a freind in the industry, and googled GoT and got this forum, i dont know who the guy your talking is.

      Quote  Reply

  290. Posted March 22, 2010 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Welcome! Nice of you to join us. Each new actor cast brings some more people interested in the show. Hope you stay around and follow the production with us. What is your impression of the project so far?

      Quote  Reply

  291. Posted March 22, 2010 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Welcome! So you know nothing about Game of Thrones and the books is that right?

      Quote  Reply

  292. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    BTW, does anyone remember where in the books it actually goes in to detail that Catelyn is so beautiful?? I keep on hearing this, but I don't remember her being that way. I'd love it if someone who knows the books better than I could refer me to some quotes where Martin waxes on about her beauty. Cersei's obvious, but I don't remember much about Catelyn….

    Thanks

      Quote  Reply

  293. Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Can people PLEASE try and spoiler warn for things. I mean come on, that's quite a big reveal you just completely trashed for anyone who hasn't read through ASoS. There are people that come to this site that haven't read the books.

      Quote  Reply

  294. Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    I'm super sad at losing Ehle. I wish it weren't so, but that's how the cookie crumbles as they say.

    Hopefully Fairley will do a great job and we'll all be glad for the change.

    Oh, on a humorous note, I'm not sure why we're still posting in this thread. It was already won with the "Now they got ahead on the casting, by casting Catelyn and Old Nan at once" comment. Even if you disagree with the sentiment, that was pretty hillarious.

      Quote  Reply

  295. jack bruce
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    i know about about the writer of GoT, i only came to know about this book , because of the actress fairley, i seen her plays in London , which are complex, emotional , very heavy weight and deep, such as Ibsen, Mamet, Pinter, Shakesphere, Frank McGuinness, they are the types of writings and plays she normally does, from what i hear she is an actors actor.

      Quote  Reply

  296. Kyle
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    I find it difficult to swallow how many people are attacking Fairley for being an older woman who was probably just as attractive as Jennifer Ehle when she was the same age. Besides, doesn’t the acting skill matter more than gross attractiveness?

    As an aside, I will note that I had no feelings whatsoever about Ehle prior to this change. I had never heard of her before the casting decision was announced, and still have never seen anything she’s been in. I never felt that Ehle looked like Catelyn, either, as I imagined her. Perhaps that colors my feelings.

      Quote  Reply

  297. Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    On top of that, Fairley is only 3 years older, or what was the number we established? negligible, and don't tell me anyone can notice that :)

      Quote  Reply

  298. Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    I guess Ehle finally arrived at the epilogue of Storm of Swords haha.

    A lot of people should calm down and have a little patience, why freak out over a couple of pictures? Apparently this is a great actress that did the second-best audition for the role of Catelyn. Just google her name with theatre and you get a lot of great reviews. I've seen her in the George Best film and loved her in that.

    Yes, she is not a babe. But I definately wouldn't count her as 'fugly'. Not a lot of differences between Ehle and her on the beauty-scale. Just have a little faith and let's see what they have in mind for Catelyn when we see her in full make-up. When they've transformerd her into a whiny, dragged down soccer-mom I'll be the first in line to complain, but you won't hear me before that.

      Quote  Reply

  299. Kyle
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Well, even if she breached a contract, the penalty for doing so would depend heavily on what the contract terms were. I don't think HBO is going to try and make Ehle pay for all the re-shoots, or anything like that. I think the actor's unions would make darn sure that contracts that allowed for that would not be signed.

    My guess, as long as an actor isn't leaving to take a comparable acting job for a different studio, the studios are content to release them from their contracts.

      Quote  Reply

  300. Gaz
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    i agree.

    been lurking for a while now.

    i am completly new to the whole ASOIAF world, and after hearing the greenlight news as im from northern ireland and a big fantasy fan picked up GoT (half way through and LOVING IT) and found this site.

    i have already had a few major events spoilt and i no its my fault for not finishing the book fast enough but it is scaring off new fans which im sure we can all agree is not good.

    this site and the posts are great and im really getting into this project (even went to visit shanes castle!!)

    so please, spoiler warnings would be great.

    ps winter is coming, great sight, great work, keep it up everyone!!

    Gaz

      Quote  Reply

  301. Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    BTW, I f*cking hate intensedebate. Sometimes it doesn'work at all, and a lot of time I miss some of the comments (when ranked by date or last activity). For example: I see Gregory Kelton made a comment about spoilers at last 5 comments, but I can't find it anywhere!

      Quote  Reply

  302. Kyle
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    http://www.whatsonstage.com/photos/theatre/london

    Not sure if these are redundant, but pictures 16 and 17 have Michelle Fairley at a 1st night performance event for a play on the West End.

      Quote  Reply

  303. jack bruce
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Fairleys portfolio of work includes, Ibsen, Mamet, Shakesphere, Frank McGuinness, she's an actors actor and very well respected , i only seen her in top line theaters in Londons westend, and when i spoke to other actors about her ( and every one knows her, i promise you) the reaction is always 'wow a very heavy weight theater actor she's brilliant' she did dancing at Lughnasa with kevin Spacey as Director, Brian Friel's best Plays, she dominated the show. She as also worked in Broadway with Likes of frances McDormand, Ewan Mcgregor etc i can go on for ever

      Quote  Reply

  304. Gaz
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    been lurking for a while now.

    i am completly new to the whole ASOIAF world, and after hearing the greenlight news as im from northern ireland and a big fantasy fan picked up GoT (half way through and LOVING IT) and found this site.

    i have already had a few major events spoilt and i no its my fault for not finishing the book fast enough but it is scaring off new fans which im sure we can all agree is not good.

    this site and the posts are great and im really getting into this project (even went to visit shanes castle!!)

    so please, spoiler warnings would be great.

    ps winter is coming, great sight, great work, keep it up everyone!!

    Gaz

      Quote  Reply

  305. Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    I think Gregory's spoiler comment disappeared because the comment was reported as a spoiler so it was automatically removed, along with any replies.

    I do agree with you however that Intense Debate is a little wonky. I'm hoping to have a better commenting system sometime in the near future.

      Quote  Reply

  306. Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for replying!

    If you don't mind answering another question, would you say the pictures we've seen of her do her justice?
    http://m.gmgrd.co.uk/res/578.$plit/C_71_article_1
    http://www.harrymedia.com/img/data/media/814/othe
    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arch

    I mean, people have suggested that she had been intentionally aged and made haggard-looking to fit a particular role in some of these pictures.

    Also, still pictures can be misleading as they sometimes amplify traits that are actually quite fine, or even charming, when you see them in live motion (e.g. Nicolaj Coster-Waldau’s nose).

    So having seen her in recent plays, how would you compare her look age-wise against Jennifer Ehle’s?
    http://images.broadwayworld.com/upload/18431/New Folder 4/42.jpg
    Would you say she can play a 35 y.o.? The character in the book is supposed to be around that age, but we suspect the directors might have decided to age her in the series.

    Personally, I think she looks just fine for the role and I am delighted to hear she is such a good actress, but I would like to hear a more informed source's opinion on the matter to see if other commentors' worries are founded and thus help inform the conversation here, even though I am conscious that your take on it is still subjective.

      Quote  Reply

  307. Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for replying!

    If you don't mind answering another question, would you say the pictures we've seen of her do her justice?
    http://m.gmgrd.co.uk/res/578.$plit/C_71_article_1
    http://www.harrymedia.com/img/data/media/814/othe
    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arch

    I mean, people have suggested that she had been intentionally aged and made haggard-looking to fit a particular role in some of these pictures.

    Also, still pictures can be misleading as they sometimes amplify traits that are actually quite fine, or even charming, when you see them in live motion (e.g. Nicolaj Coster-Waldau’s nose).

    So having seen her in recent plays, how would you compare her look age-wise against Jennifer Ehle’s?
    http://images.broadwayworld.com/upload/18431/New Folder 4/42.jpg
    Would you say she can play a 35 y.o.? The character in the book is supposed to be around that age, but we suspect the directors might have decided to age her in the series.

    Personally, I think she looks just fine for the role and I am delighted to hear she is such a good actress, but I would like to hear a more informed source's opinion on the matter to see if other commentors' worries are founded and thus help inform the conversation here, even though I am conscious that your take on it is still subjective.

      Quote  Reply

  308. Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for replying!

    If you don't mind answering another question, would you say the pictures we've seen of her do her justice?
    http://m.gmgrd.co.uk/res/578.$plit/C_71_article_1
    http://www.harrymedia.com/img/data/media/814/othe
    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/multimedia/arch

    I mean, people have suggested that she had been intentionally aged and made haggard-looking to fit a particular role in some of these pictures.

    Also, still pictures can be misleading as they sometimes amplify traits that are actually quite fine, or even charming, when you see them in live motion (e.g. Nicolaj Coster-Waldau’s nose).

    So having seen her in recent plays, how would you compare her look age-wise against Jennifer Ehle’s?
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_t0XO1DCg9Ho/SI6DkUzrGtI
    Would you say she can play a 35 y.o.? The character in the book is supposed to be around that age, but we suspect the directors might have decided to age her in the series.

    Personally, I think she looks just fine for the role and I am delighted to hear she is such a good actress, but I would like to hear a more informed source's opinion on the matter to see if other commentors' worries are founded and thus help inform the conversation here, even though I am conscious that your take on it is still subjective.

      Quote  Reply

  309. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    It's cause Sansa looks exactly like her, men would say she had her mother's look. Lysa looks ten years older altho she's younger, men fought a duel over her, Littlefinger just has to look at Sansa to start thinking about getting lost in her eyes, he's remembering the effect her mother had. Say handsome if you don't like the word beautiful, but she doesn't have to be a model or as hot as Cersei to come off like she's supposed to in the books.

    Michelle Fairley isn't ugly but she comes off as older than the character was. Being talented is really good, but wouldn't there be plenty of talented actresses that fit Cat closer? It really depends on what this reason for the change was. Are they covering up for Ehle dropping out by calling it a change in direction?

      Quote  Reply

  310. jack bruce
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    the pictures that you have seen are when she is in character, she played an alcoholic in best her mothers son based in the late 60's of course she don't look like that, she is very attractive in real life, Actually she looks like joan allen but fairley looks younger

      Quote  Reply

  311. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    She _looks_ older is all I'm saying. I do think skill matters more but there's probably actresses that look like the character's age that are also talented right?

      Quote  Reply

  312. jack bruce
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    yes the one with white silver top, what do u think

      Quote  Reply

  313. Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Done and done. :)

      Quote  Reply

  314. Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    See this link for excellent reviews for her performance in 'Greta Garbo Came to Donegal': http://www.whatsonstage.com/roundup/theatre/londo

    more raving reviews for her performance in 'Dancing at Lughnasa': http://www.whatsonstage.com/roundup/theatre/londo

      Quote  Reply

  315. Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:00 pm | Permalink

    well these are better than the critics I read of Ehle's latest theatre performance…

      Quote  Reply

  316. Gaz
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Nymeria!

    Will do! The trip to shanes castle was a nightmare tho! invovling getting lost, running out of petrol, goin to the wrong place, shanes castle being closed to the public, and finally being chased by grounds men as we went on in anyways. fun times.

    I am indeed, GRRM makes it effortless tho. Thanks to BBC NI and WiC he has a new fan!
    The hype and positivity from fans on WiC has me excited for the show and the rest of the series

    As for Fairley, whilst not the ideal look for Catelyn, i have seen her acting ability – if we cant have Ehle then Fairley will do a fantastic job!!

      Quote  Reply

  317. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, but wasn't Sansa supposed to be far prettier than Catelyn?? That Catelyn was cute when younger, but that Sansa is far more a greater beauty. I'm still hunting for all those quotes that talk about how beautiful Catelyn is (not was) and how important it is to her character.

    As for the older thing– I guess it's a matter of opinion, but they _are_ aging everyone 5-15 years.

      Quote  Reply

  318. Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    Do you know the reason Shane's castle was closed to the public?
    Was it outside of the usual hours of operation? Or is it always closed in the winter?

    Maybe they are already building a set…..

      Quote  Reply

  319. Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    Pulled this from a comment on my original Ehle cast as Catelyn post.

    "Sansa had gotten their mother's fine high cheekbones and the thick auburn hair of the Tullys."

    "Her face was windburnt and gaunt, but it had lost none of its determination."

    "Her face was so strong and handsome, her skin so smooth and soft."

    Interestingly enough people were debating at the time that Jennifer Ehle was not pretty enough. I guess we are just hard to please. ;)

      Quote  Reply

  320. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

    It doesn't say Sansa is _far more_ a greater beauty. She's younger, she looks fresher, and yeah maybe she'll be more beautiful when she grows, but Catelyn is no slouch. She's not cute, she's elegant and handsome.

    People have been saying that its not important for Catelyn to look like a model, but her looks (IMO handsome and well kept up) are still a part of her character, so why not go for the whole package? Whats the problem with that? And they're aging everyone up, yeah, but Cat should look like she's Cersei's peer, whatever the actors' ages are.

      Quote  Reply

  321. Gaz
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    lol i no what your thinking, filming? a new set?

    but im afriad not, i thought the same so did a bit of research – shanes castle is now, and has been for some time closed to the public and is now only open to large events by appointment only, nothing to do with GoT.

    I also spend each summer in the mourne mountains, mentioned in other post, a really beautiful place and hope they film there.

    northern irelands most famous tourist attraction is the giants causeway, not read anything it could be used for yet, but its so unique id love it to make an appearance.

    the main pic on wiki is a good one

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Giants_Causeway

      Quote  Reply

  322. Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    wow that is very unique indeed!
    I will keep it in mind when I reread the series (hopefully I have the time to do so soon) and try to figure a possible use for it :)

      Quote  Reply

  323. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    Can someone give us an overview of the kinds of roles Fairley is usually cast in? I'm seeing that she's really talented but so far it's like all her roles are about being worn out matronly supporting types. What are all the different stage roles she's had?

      Quote  Reply

  324. Posted March 22, 2010 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    Weel that seems to fit Fairley well IMO.
    Thanks for the citations WiC.

      Quote  Reply

  325. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 6:27 pm | Permalink

    "You have your mother's eyes. Honest eyes, and innocent. Blue as a sunlit sea. When you are a little older, many a man will drown in those eyes." That's waxing!

    People used to say Famke Janssen for Catelyn, I guess because she played a redhead in another geek franchise. I said hell no, Janssen doesn't have the acting chops or the presence, even if she is hot. My problem is more age. Older women should have roles but Catelyn just isn't that much older than Cersei.

      Quote  Reply

  326. guest
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    she does very complex indept roles ,she does the likes of ibsen, shakesphere , mamet, pinter check out her reviews

      Quote  Reply

  327. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:02 pm | Permalink

    Sorry I'm not familiar with theater. I know the names of the playwrights but they write a lot of different kinds of roles. In Dancing at Lughnasa she played a matronly role, in Ibsen's Lady of the Sea she was Bolette. Isn't Bolette passive? What Im reading is her best role was Valerie in The Weir, what was that role like? Is that like the roles she's getting lately?

      Quote  Reply

  328. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    Interesting quotes. As for beautiful eyes, etc.– just remember, Brienne has beautiful eyes too!! Martin waxes on about them and their affect on others far more than anything about Catelyn. :)

    As for Cersei vs. Catleyn– I think the idea is that Cersei has led a more pampered life in Kings Landing, both in terms of how others treat her, as well as how she treats herself. Catelyn lives in the hard north. Catleyn actually adores her children and seems to be pretty personally involved in their lives, frets over them etc. Cersei is obviously a mother, but I wouldn't expect any of those worry lines on her until things start to get complicated for her as the books continue. Cersei seems like the type who would fret over her appearance, while Catelyn seems less that way.

    Look, I'm not saying Catelyn should be a hag or anything. I loved the idea of Ehle. It just seems so easy to move that character around a bit. Leady is 37. How old is Fairley? 45? It just doesn't seem that big of a deal. Perhaps Catelyn was a beauty when she was younger but hasn't aged well. Who knows??

    I know the truth is we'll just have to wait and see. People had issues with Ehle originally too.

      Quote  Reply

  329. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Catelyn lives in an expansive castle surrounded by servants! It doesn't matter if its in the north, the north is harder for the smallfolk but the nobles have it made. Catelyn doesn't go around hunting or foraging, she's kept in the nicest quarters of a very comfortable castle, the only difference maybe that Cersei is more ornamental.
    Long periods of stress do affect your health and appearance, but the character should be cast the way she starts out, so we can see that its a vibrant healthy woman being dragged down. Fairley and Headey could be the same age for all it matters, she just _looks_ older, and no there's no reason Catelyn should've not aged well. That doesn't seem to match Brienne's response.
    I know people are hard to please, but this role is in danger of a lot of stereotypes if you think about it.

      Quote  Reply

  330. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:21 pm | Permalink

    I'm still waiting for all those quotes that show how Catleyn was a great beauty.

    Whatever the case, you're right– people here are hard to please, and obviously they expect a certain kind of beauty on screen. Nothing I say is going to change their minds.

      Quote  Reply

  331. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    Are you reading the parts where I was saying she doesn't have to be a supermodel? Im not expecting Miss Universe here.

      Quote  Reply

  332. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:46 pm | Permalink

    Apologies. Gettin' snarky here. ;P

    I think part of the problem is that people are judging her mostly by the pics where's she's supposed to be playing an over the hill alcoholic. There are others where she looks fine to me. She's not as pretty as Ehle is though, that's true. Although Ehle really is practically as a pretty as a model would be. She's very beautiful, to me.

    What's odd is that I could see people being sad that Ehle isn't Catelyn. That makes sense. I'm sad she isn't, because I'm a fan of hers. But that's not really what's going on here. People are using strong language to talk about how ugly this new woman is and how they hate her because she's not as beautiful as Ehle. And that is true.

    So, yeah, when you say she "doesn't have to be a supermodel", that seems to go against a lot of the naysayers in this thread, and the general push of the whole conversation.

      Quote  Reply

  333. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    Yeah people should be nicer to Fairley. Being so mean doesnt solve anything. But I still think the age thing is there, thats why I wanna know more about the usual roles she gets these days. Maybe that will say about why the producers tweaked the role. What are they thinking I wonder?

      Quote  Reply

  334. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    Oh, I'm sure they want to play her more as a middle aged mother, rougher around the edges, tougher, perhaps someone that was more pretty in their youth but has let that go vs. the boldly beautiful yet outrageously vain seductress that is Cersei. That's my guess.

    I personally don't have any problems with that, as I always basically pictured Catelyn that way. I guess she was sort of pretty in my mind, but it was never anything important to me. Ehle being so beautiful was just a sort of nice bonus to me, nothing essential.

      Quote  Reply

  335. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 8:01 pm | Permalink

    It never says she let her looks go in the books either ;) That's just people thinking she must be that way because she's "The Mom", and I hope D&D don't share that opinion no matter how many fans do.

      Quote  Reply

  336. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 8:03 pm | Permalink

    Oh, I agree it doesn't say that in the books.

    Why don't you D and D to do that? What's bad about it? Too cliche for you? Sorta fits Catelyn's character to me….

      Quote  Reply

  337. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 8:08 pm | Permalink

    Thats probably why all the fans are arguing, we dont see the character the same way. If you think Catelyn is a stereotypical dowdy soccer mom then you missed the point of her character. She's not a soccer mom, she's a LADY, and putting her in that stereotype is changing whats in the books. It is cliche, and the idea that beautiful must mean your vain is not a good message. Cersei is beautiful but bad, Brienne is plain but good, there are characters who are not good looking or good people, and beautiful people can be good too. Sansa is beautiful but she's also gentle whereas Cat is strong. I think its good to see strong good women as well as strong bad ones, so Cat and Cersei should come off like the foils they are. Being older in order to fit a stereotype is backwards. If Fairley was cast for her talent _despite_ being older, maybe because she was the only one available when Ehle quit, thats understandable. But its like theyre saying they purposely chose her.

      Quote  Reply

  338. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    ::chuckle:: I'm sure you must think I see Catelyn as a soccer mom, but I don't. I agree, that's cliche.

    I just don't care if she's beautiful or not, but you do. Power to you.

    Hopefully, they'll pretty her up and she'll be a great actress too– then she can be strong and beautiful, as well as engaging as an actress and we'll both be happy. It's the same to me either way.

      Quote  Reply

  339. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    Again putting words into my mouth ;) I said age not beauty.

      Quote  Reply

  340. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    I'm sorry, I just don't see what being a powerful lady has to do with being young or beautiful. Age or looks. That seemed to be what you were arguing– that you didn't want the stereotype of powerful woman= dowdy/ not beautiful. Sorry if that sounds like I'm "putting words into your mouth".

    Either I'm not understanding something that you are saying that's very clear, or you're not explaining yourself well enough. Or some combo of both. So no, I don't fee like I'm putting words in your mouth.

    For the record though– if it feels like I'm doing it to you, just FYI, but it feels like you're doing the exact same thing to me.

      Quote  Reply

  341. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

    OK sorry if I dont get you. Here's what you said:
    "Too cliche for you? Sorta fits Catelyn's character to me…. "
    So I thought you meant that the stereotype fits the character?
    And I don't think the recast has to mean anything, but it is believable that it could, especially if you look at how moms are always shown in movies and tv. The stereotype isn't powerful women=dowdy, but good women are matronly, benign and of lesser beauty. Bad women are sexy and powerful. If you look at some arguments, its like being beautiful must show that your vain and bad, while being only pretty or not caring about your looks shows that your good. As for age, I think she really should look like Cersei's age cause in the books, they are peers, theyre written as foils. Martin already lets the male characters interact with each other more than the female ones, I dont want to lose the few indications of female stories that we have, and the thing thats great with Catelyn is that she's strong wtihout being the stereotypical warrior babe or tomboy.

      Quote  Reply

  342. Posted March 22, 2010 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Welcome Gaz!
    Good to hear the news is attracting new fans.
    Keep us updated if you see any action in Northern Ireland or if you decide to become an extra or something!
    Hope you're having a good read.

      Quote  Reply

  343. Posted March 22, 2010 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    For nostalgia's sake, I just took a look at the comments from when Ehle was cast:

    http://winter-is-coming.blogspot.com/2009/08/jenn

    As I remembered, there were a few arguments at that time about Ehle not having the right look for the role, as well, and then defenders stepping in to remind/inform the detractors about her stage work.

    I think it was Neil Gaiman who said recently that people always hate the new Doctor after a regeneration, it's a given. I doubt any casting or recasting will occur without some controversy.

    I honestly am not concerned about D&D or others involved in the production seeing a lot of folks belly-aching on this board and thinking, "Why are we bothering with this?" Their love for the project is what brought them to this, not a desire to please critical fans. They're not just going to pack it in because a few people called Fairley old. I'm positive that any argument we can think of has already been discussed to death in the casting process.

    Still, I do think that the way posters conduct themselves will have a bearing on how much weight those involved in the production give the opinions they read here. That in and of itself is a reason to stay civil, if you care at all about the work Winter and others have put into this.

    Announcement -> Flare Up -> Acceptance seems to be the standard pattern, and I'm not too worried about it changing any time soon.

      Quote  Reply

  344. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 9:14 pm | Permalink

    What Dem said. There is no reason that you couldn't alter the plot a teeny bit to allow for it.

    As for the spoiler warnings, while I personally don't think I revealed anything (think the spoiler comment was directed at sw's mention of what happens to the Tyrion/Shae relationship), I have always scratched my head at folks who would rather post and frequent sites like this than spend their reading time finishing the books. I mean really, if you are as excited enough about the series to come to a GoT website, think of how more exciting it would be if you could participate with a full bank of knowledge behind your comments.

      Quote  Reply

  345. Lord Ned's Head
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    The only possible exception to this (in my head anyway, to each his or her own), would be people who intentionally wish to remain in the dark in order to enjoy the story for the first time via the series and not the books. but again, if this is you, it might behoove you to stay away from any media outlet that could possbly leak info.

    I don't mean to chastise anyone who wants to be a part of WiC. All are welcome. I'm just suggesting that if you prefer to be surprised when you watch the series for the first time you might be smart to patiently wait it out without checking the daily comments.

      Quote  Reply

  346. Ninepenny
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    Based on the description in the books Fairley seems like a suitable choice. I look forward to seeing her in the role.

      Quote  Reply

  347. Md.
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    Must be the movie where she playes the mother of Best. Well, I was really wondering if that's not characterisation. Good to know it might be.
    As to Miss Bennett -> Same here. I see some doubts in the community whether she could pull UnCat off, but I think she would have been awesome ;) But alas, now we will never know :D

      Quote  Reply

  348. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Ines, starting back up here to save space– You said, "The stereotype isn't powerful women=dowdy, but good women are matronly, benign and of lesser beauty." I gotta say, that's a pretty fine line, as "matronly, benign, and of lesser beauty" is how I would define dowdy.

    As for Cersei and Catelyn being foils, I guess that's true. Insightful. All the more reason for Catelyn not to be beautiful– although you're not arguing for that anyways. Truthfully, Daenerys is far more a foil for Cersei as the series continues, and I'm sure we'll see more of that in Dance. Definitely, for the first season atleast, though, Catelyn/Cersei are good foils to each other. I agree on that.

      Quote  Reply

  349. Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Oh, ok. That would hardly be a change at all, so i wouldn't have a problem with it.

      Quote  Reply

  350. Steve B
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Well, if I'm reading you right, we agree that Catelyn should be powerful, regardless of if she's dowdy or not. …. I'd sort of like to see a dowdy, middle aged woman who is also powerful, a lady, capable of understanding and affecting the politics of the land. That would be a nice change of pace. Generally, you have to be beautiful to be powerful in TV and movies, so I'd like that change.

    As for Daernys and Cersei– my take is that they're really foils politically, as queens. Martin has said how he wanted to contrast them in Feast. That seems to have a lot more to do with different ways of ruling a kingdom than it does with Daernys being the "beautiful younger woman here to knock Cersei off her throne".

    Catelyn and Cersei seem more like foils as contrasting mothers. They do both affect a great many events and decisions, but only Cersei does it publicly. Catleyn affects things often by acting alone. Therefore, I don't really see them as foils politically.

      Quote  Reply

  351. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Catelyn is used to persuading her husband, thats how it came off to me. And Ned listens to her. Robert doesn't listen at all to Cersei I bet. But when their husbands die Catelyn has to deal with an older Robb who is more northern than she is. Cersei can keep acting _for_ Joffrey because he's young and his bannermen arent making him prove he's a man like Robb's are. Catelyn is cooperative and Cersei is competitive but Catelyn can also get away with that for most of her life. But in the first part of the story it changes because of the difference in husbands and sons.
    Danerys makes her decisions differently than Cersei does, she truly cares for people and listens to her advisers and Cersei does not. But Cersei doesnt have dragons and that means she has to deal with powerlessness more like Catelyn. Shes done it through using her body while Danerys doesnt have to (her sex scenes are about enjoyment but Cersei never enjoys sex that we see). Catelyn chooses not to use her body, but like Cersei, she has no easy way to make people listen to her like Danerys does.
    Cersei uses her body too much actually, she never developed her father's cunning. But Catelyn was raised as her fathers heir and probably would do things even better than her brother does. Both Catelyn and Cersei are the oldest born but have to defer to brothers. The limitations they deal with are more similar, Dany has an easy way out of it because her husband dies and her barrenness means she doesnt have to deal with motherhood, that too limits your power as a woman. Catelyns and Cerseis lives being so similar makes their different strategies mean more. It makes us admire Catelyn being a better person but also makes us feel bad for Cersei who had such a worse life.
    I think making Catelyn dowdy isn't necessary though. There are those other bad messages with the mother part. Beauty and power usually make a bad woman, why not a good one? Also I dont think she needs to be as beautiful as Cersei or whatever, but she is in the prime of her life and I dont see a reason to change that. It makes a lot of her lines make more sense like when she looks at Brienne and pities her for being ugly, when Walder Frey jokes about her seducing him, when Tyrion gets angry about her calling men to her rescue with her feminine charm.

      Quote  Reply

  352. George
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 1:36 am | Permalink

    I didn't mean to offend you. I felt it was appropriate to be condescending to Pat because he or she was so condescending to Nicole. It was my version of "how do you like it?"

    In trying to be pithy, I associated IQ with writing English well, but I don't really believe that. In fact, I only marginally associate IQ with intelligence, as it is such a narrow view of such a broad topic. There are many forms of intelligence.

    Not to mention that even a genius can't write well without a good education, an opportunity which is still denied to many people.

    I'm not the pompous ass that comment makes me seem, and, again, sorry to anyone who was offended by it. Except Pat, he/she deserved it.

      Quote  Reply

  353. Lex
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    You know, after seeing those book descriptions of Cat (i.e. high cheekbones, big blue eyes, etc.) I am now very happy with Fairley. She DOES have the right look.

    Forget Ehle. She abandoned us!

    I'm 100% Fairley, all the way!

    (I think most of the negativity stemmed from people being shocked and disappointed that Ehle left. People will warm up to Fairley, trust me. By the time the show airs, people will love her).

      Quote  Reply

  354. Posted March 23, 2010 at 2:19 am | Permalink

    She has a harder look about her which may fit the later episodes in the season as well as future seasons better.

      Quote  Reply

  355. Inês
    Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Sorry Steve, I meant to say that POWER isn't part of the dowdy mom stereotype. Being good is.
    I don't think being not beautiful enhances the foils, foils dont mean youre opposites. Foils mean you set each others differences off, often times you have to be a little similar to do that. Cersei and Catelyn both have political marriages, their husbands are supposed to be in love with some tragic dead woman, their weapons are politics instead of fists, they would do anything and everything for their children. They even both worry about the safety of their children's inheritance, and their husbands have this infidelity thing. But Catelyn is a good person, her anger has limits, she genuinely wants to make things work and tries to do right, and all the men in her life are nicer and it makes it easier for her. Cersei comes off more powerful but she also does heinous things to get there, Cat doesn't ever give up she just has to pick her battles. Theyre like mirror universe counterparts, and they are foils for much longer than Martin wanted Cersei and Danerys to be which was just for A Feast For Crows. That was just to show us how they do as queens, but Cersei and Cat are the ones who are peers. Danerys is the beautiful younger woman here to knock Cersei off her throne. Every time Cat struggles with something in her society we see the parallel situation with Cersei and vice versa.
    I just think it works a lot better if they come off as contemporaries. Maybe they'll do it that way anyway, I don't know. I just want to understand why they changed their minds. Fairley is talented but so is Ehle, she has a BAFTA! Maybe it really isnt a planned change, maybe something really did happen to make Ehle drop out.

      Quote  Reply

  356. Posted March 23, 2010 at 4:12 am | Permalink

    Oh please, yes!

    I find wonky is too mild a word to discribe it – spoiled & broken would be more fitting…

      Quote  Reply

  357. Posted March 23, 2010 at 5:43 am | Permalink

    People are too reactionary, you have not even seen either as Catelyn, and are already bashing. Life goes on, enjoy it while you can. This is not something to be riled up about.

    Sure I'm a little disappointed since I was comfortable with Ehle, but I'm sure this woman will do a fine job. Will I bash her? Possibly I will in the future, the difference is I will wait until there is actual substance for bashing.

      Quote  Reply

  358. jeremy
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 6:29 am | Permalink

    maybe tied with the Jamie casting, Mark Addy doesn't seem right either though.

      Quote  Reply

  359. jeremy
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 6:36 am | Permalink

    huh…whats wrong with Adrian Paul- best highlander ever! has great fighting/sword fighting skills, I'd love to see him cast in a role on the show.

      Quote  Reply

  360. jeremy
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 6:47 am | Permalink

    I've seen Ehle, Anderson, and Moore all sport Auburn hair, plus it's not just the hair color , it's the eyes the whole overall feel you get when looking at Cat- she should grab your attention and only be bested by the looks of Cersei who is a few years younger. Fairley looks 10,15 years older even with makeup that's a problem.

      Quote  Reply

  361. Coltaine777
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    I actually liked Highlander too…but Adrian Paul didn't impress me as an actor and I think with so Much talent out there we should set our standards higher

      Quote  Reply

  362. amaranth
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    "This is bordering on ridiculous. And it's always actresses. It's just sad."

    Exactly! Why isn't everybody bitching about Jaime, he is certainly described as drop dead gorgeous in the books and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau is surely not it. Yet somehow people are giving him a chance.

      Quote  Reply

  363. Scott
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    Imagine this, you heard about this show because of one of many reasons, a friend, you like Sean Bean, or who knows whatever reason. You think hey, this could be cool so you start reading the first book. Not everyone goes through a 900 page book in a week.

    You still want to hear about the show so you keep coming to the site and you accidently see a HUGE spoiler from the 3RD BOOK! Why are we speculating over what might happen 3 seasons from now, could be 4 if they split ASoS! Now I know something that's going to happen 2 1/2 books from where I am because I'm only half way through GoT.

    True, maybe you should stay away from places that might have spoilers, but at the same time, it shouldn't be so hard to have *SPOILER* written before a comment that may hold a key plot point that not everyone knows.

      Quote  Reply

  364. Steve B
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    I'll never understand this pov people have about how Catelyn is so beautiful, "second only to Cersei". I've read these books 3 or 4 times, like a lot of others here I'm sure, and I've never pictured her like that at all. Pretty, maybe. Maybe prettier when she was younger. After all, Sansa's very pretty. I just never felt like Martin went off about how beautiful she is (the way he does with Cersei), and yet it's all everyone talks about here.

      Quote  Reply

  365. Posted March 23, 2010 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    I just need to say that not everybody feels that way. I find Nikolaj Coster-Waldau very handsome.
    Although it is true about TV and movies in general that almost every actress needs to be pretty to make it in the industry, while there are plenty of ugly or ok-looking actors who are landing major roles. Beauty standards seem to be higher for women in general in this field. personally, I think talent should always come first, but a combination of both beauty and talent is always desirable.

    But I must say GoT fans are lucky thus far look-wise with the male casting, from the youngs to the middle-aged, I find there is at least one attractive man in every age group which will make our viewing experience even that more satisfying.

      Quote  Reply

  366. Posted March 23, 2010 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    How official is this? So far it is just the one article in the Hollywood reporter right? Or has there been an official statement?

      Quote  Reply

  367. Posted March 23, 2010 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    It is official. Hollywood Reporter basically just reports what studios tell them. So this info would have come directly from HBO.

      Quote  Reply

  368. Kyle
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    I think that everything I hear about Fairley is that she is a tremendous actress. If D&D want Catelyn to be ten years younger than she really is, they'll do it with make-up instead of hiring a less fantastic younger actress. That's good for me.

    Catelyn promises to be one of the most difficult characters to play, folks. Remember that most of her POV chapters are in her head, and that the actress playing her will have to convey all of that information wordlessly. That is a tall order, and it will take phenomenal skill to accomplish. I'm not saying Ehle didn't have it, but Fairley's body of work indicates that she does.

      Quote  Reply

  369. Posted March 23, 2010 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    Jennifer Ehle has a fairly formidable presence in many of her roles (even in P&P she showed a lot of steel, even moreso in THE CAMOMILE LAWN), but it did occur to me that in the movie she did with Lena Headey, she did come across as a stronger presence (and IIRC she is taller than Headey as well), which HBO might have felt to be undesirable for the Cersei/Catelyn dynamic and contrast. Although to be honest, given their lack of screentime together (the only scene they share together alone is a new one, set in Bran's bedchamber for the second episode), this probably wasn't a major issue or dealbreaker. And if it was it could have been solved by them flipping the actress' roles, something suggested at the time as I recall.

      Quote  Reply

  370. amaranth
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Coster-Waldau is certainly attractive in a rugged sort of way, but he is still very unlike the golden Jaime of the books. My point is that he seems to be much worse fit looks-wise than either Catelyn or Dany, so it puzzles me a bit that people complain mostly about the females. Or maybe people did complain when the castings were originally announced, just not with such vitriol.

    In any case it's certainly nothing new that women are judged more harshly, especially regarding aging. I suppose there's not much point in even pointing that out. Sean Bean looks much older than Fairley in the recent pictures I've seen, but of course that just adds to his charm.

      Quote  Reply

  371. Posted March 23, 2010 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    ouch, watch out for the spoilers!

      Quote  Reply

  372. Ron
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    A bit disappointed…..but hopefully she’ll fit the role. I’m more interested in filling in for Dolorous Ed.

      Quote  Reply

  373. Kyle
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    HBO wouldn't issue a press release if it weren't official.

      Quote  Reply

  374. Frez
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    I'm so disappointed I won't look at the series at all…that's over for me !!

      Quote  Reply

  375. Posted March 23, 2010 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    After the initial shock, I have to say I'm now perfectly happy for the replacement. Ms Fairley seems to be an actress more than accomplished, her age is in tune with the general age-up of the series, and now I'm positively sure she'll do a hell of a job here.

    Still, I think the initial reaction was, albet somewhat over the top, comprehensible to a certain point.
    Most people were thrilled to have Jennifer Ehle aboard. Michelle Fairley is an almost unknown actress outside the UK theatre scene, specially in other countries, there's not a single good image of her, in fact, the first ones were disgraceful indeed. And the announcement came all of a sudden, nobody expected the spanish inquisition here.

    So, Ms Fairly, if for any dismal chance you're reading this: WELCOME TO WESTEROS!

      Quote  Reply

  376. Posted March 23, 2010 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    This is off topic but I just found British actress I think would be suitable as Brienne. At least now when they seem to age the characters a bit. Gwendoline Christie. She's tall – 6'3" or 6'4".
    Here's video of her acting in Cymbeline and interview after that (starts from 1:45)

      Quote  Reply

  377. Posted March 23, 2010 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    Wow

    Just wow. Nailed her spot on.
    She even got the big eyes (can't check out color, though, but that's what contacts are made for, are they not?

      Quote  Reply

  378. Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:00 pm | Permalink

    What a great find. She is REALLY tall. I know it is still at least a year plus away from them casting Brienne but it seems like someone (Paul Gude?) should notify her agent of the possibility for a huge breakout role for her. I have to imagine great roles for 6'3" women don't come along that often.

      Quote  Reply

  379. Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    They are aging the characters, but theres a limit… She looks to be maybe 40?

      Quote  Reply

  380. Lex
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    Stupid.

      Quote  Reply

  381. Lex
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    I agree with you, I'm 100% for Fairley now.

    I think the initial reaction was mostly due to shock (AND the fact that we had a picture of the WRONG PERSON attached to the story! Ali White did not look right at all).

    I still think the initial Tamzin reaction was even more negative than this, though.

      Quote  Reply

  382. Lex
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    Speaking of that, where is Paul Gude these days? I don't see his comments. Did he change his name?

      Quote  Reply

  383. Lex
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    WHOA… how tall is she?!? She looks like a giant in that photo.

      Quote  Reply

  384. Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    6'3… that's about 1.90 meters, for us MDS users.

    So, she's a really big lady, no doubt.

      Quote  Reply

  385. Posted March 23, 2010 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    He posts under his twitter-account @sgnp.

      Quote  Reply

  386. Lex
    Posted March 23, 2010 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    I really think that photo of Ali White did some damage. Her smile looked kind of smug, which did not sit well with the news story. Nobody's fault, but it definitely didn't help matters.

    Poor Ali, poor Michelle…!

      Quote  Reply

  387. Posted March 23, 2010 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    You can see Gwendoline also on Patrick Wolf's Damaris video.

      Quote  Reply

  388. Posted March 24, 2010 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    Fantastic find ! I can definately see her as Brienne, even if she is a bit older than the Brienne of the books.

      Quote  Reply

  389. Posted March 24, 2010 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    I've been searching for hours and haven't found her age, either. I think this Twitter account might be her's but it's private.

      Quote  Reply

  390. Posted March 24, 2010 at 1:41 am | Permalink

    Agreed about the naivete. However I think they could get around her not looking 19/20 by just going for late 20s but implying she is so naive due to her sheltered life. Just slip in something about how she hadn't left Tarth at all until joining Renly because she was so embarrassed about her size and awkwardness.

      Quote  Reply

  391. Posted March 24, 2010 at 3:36 am | Permalink

    Unfortunately, I don't have access to IMPD Pro since I was let go from my job, so my efforts won't be as immediate. But, yeah…A Shakespearian actress who is over 6ft tall, looks younger than the rest of the cast, with big eyes? Honestly, this is the best suggestion I've seen so far.

      Quote  Reply

  392. Posted March 24, 2010 at 12:35 am | Permalink

    I haven't found anything at all that pins down her age. Still looking. She graduated drama school in 2005, which probably puts her in her late 20's to early 30's now. So it's possible to get her looking early-20's for Brienne. For me that's the kicker: she needs to be able to emote a certain naivete, or it's just not Brienne.

    But this one might!

      Quote  Reply

  393. Lady_B
    Posted March 24, 2010 at 7:01 am | Permalink

    I have to question why it would be undesirable though. Catelyn is the one that comes across as stronger, Cersei is the one that seems gentle, and that's the wonderful irony about her character. Remember how easy it is for Sansa to find her so soft and sweet, while she thinks of her mother as the hard one. Tyrion calls Cersei "sweet sister" with so much wonderful irony, because he knows that her surface image is such a lie. The show may want to change that, for some reason, but to be totally precise, I think that would be their own insertion.

    I mean, for my part I think Jennifer Ehle comes off as a bit nice, while Headey comes off as more gritty, but that's my own take.

      Quote  Reply

  394. Frez
    Posted March 24, 2010 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    Yeah, thanks, I always appreciate a good insult…:)

      Quote  Reply

  395. Rimshot44
    Posted March 24, 2010 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Just realised that I've been in a scene with her!

    I did some work on 'Best: His Mother's Son' a while ago. My main role was one of a handful of journalists trying to get a quote from George Best as he leaves his house but they kept me back to do a small 'passer-by' role. This was a very simple 'man walking past' job which I've done loads of times. This scene is at the start of the film when George's mum, play by Michelle, is scrubbing her front step (this was common practise in NI in the 60's – I remember my mum doing it!) and a small kid comes up to her and gives her a drawing he made for George to say good luck in a forthcoming match. The wee lad playing the part was very excited and he showed me the drawing.

    <contd>

      Quote  Reply

  396. Rimshot44
    Posted March 24, 2010 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Now, when I do a wee easy job like this, I always try to add something and so I thought I'd give the kid a wee look as he runs away. I did it and the 3rd AD came up to me and said 'good job and I liked the glance you gave to the kid'. Job done!

    I've learnt over the years that you can't expect the 3rd AD to tell you excatly what to do for every shot. Recently I've done more and more shots where I've added elements myself and also where I have been given no notes at all so I had to interpret the scene and what I had to do.

    <contd>

      Quote  Reply

  397. Rimshot44
    Posted March 24, 2010 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    For example, on GOT, when I was filling my Brazier (I know – not the Braziers again!) I had to time it just right to be walking back across the courtyard just as the the lannister crowd (Hound, Tommen, Joffrey et al) are leaving from the sparring session. I timed it so that I would have to stop to let them walk past. I remember giving a look of servititude mixed with contempt as I stood watching them go by. Now this may not even be seen but I strongly believe that if all extras take care with this attention to detail (and most of the extras I've worked with do) then this gives the overall appearance more integrity.

    You can't expect to be hand-held through every scene as an extra. More often than not you need to come up with something quickly that will work in the scene.

    <contd>

      Quote  Reply

  398. Rimshot44
    Posted March 24, 2010 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    Another one was on 'Your Highness' where I played an evil Minion. In one scene I played a huge kettle drum while Zooey Dechanel writhed about on a bed (you'll have to watch the film to find out why!). I wasn't told what beat to use and I soon realised that no AD was coming near me to give me any notes so when I heard action I had to figure out what beat would work best. Thankfully I'm a professional drummer so I managed a kind of dirge which really fitted the scene. At the end of the scene the 1st AD came to me and said 'good drumming'. I have to say, getting positive feedback like that really makes my day.

    I have loads of acedotes like the ones above but I'll save them for the book (by the way – if I ever did write a book about being an extra it would be called 'Hurry up and Wait')!!

    Here are a couple of pics of me in the scene with Michelle. She has her face turned away and I'm the one in the cap walking past.

    http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r297/Doc_44/pa

    http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r297/Doc_44/pa

      Quote  Reply

  399. Posted March 24, 2010 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    Awesome insight on being an extra Rimshot. Cool you already did a scene with Michelle. If I see the Best movie again I'll be sure to pause it at your scene!!

      Quote  Reply

  400. Myrcella
    Posted March 24, 2010 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    Cersei is a longer commitment than Catelyn? Not the way I reckon. Not as yet, anyway.

      Quote  Reply

  401. Posted March 24, 2010 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    George writes a bit about Michelle Fairley and says he's going to write one episode (but not which one).
    http://grrm.livejournal.com/142143.html

      Quote  Reply

  402. Posted March 24, 2010 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, I sent a request. We'll see. I've also sent a note to her agents who (silly me) were listed on the page you posted about her.

      Quote  Reply

  403. Posted March 24, 2010 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    Honestly, that interview sold me. I think Gwendoline would approach Brienne with the same thoughtfulness, and we'd see a real reflection of the character from the book.

      Quote  Reply

  404. Posted March 24, 2010 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    You're awesome! :)

      Quote  Reply

  405. Posted March 24, 2010 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    wow, thanks for the input!
    This was very interesting.
    I actually thought an extra was told what to do down to where to place your feet and where to look, and that they made you rehearse until everything was perfect before bringing in the big actors. I guess they just don't have the time to do that…
    Keep up the good work as an extra and keep telling us more anecdotes!

      Quote  Reply

  406. JE fan
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 4:08 am | Permalink

    I was only excited about this series because Jennifer Ehle was going to be in it.

    I am not normally a fiction, never mind fantasy, reader. When a JE fan, though, one is grateful for any and every project because there is often a lot of waiting in between things.

    It is disappointing, in retrospect, that I invested significant time into the books to find out more about JE's role as Catelyn.

    No offense to the new actress or to the series author, each of whom is talented in his/her own right, but I will not be investing time or money from this point forward into the series or HBO because of this change. I do hope it still turns out wonderfully for all the die hard fans of the series though!

      Quote  Reply

  407. jojoziggy
    Posted March 25, 2010 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Except for that in the actually BOOKS we know that Cat was almost the same age as Ned (they were both teenagers). So whatever social "norms" are supposed to be in Westeros, the actual AGE of Cat should be nearly the same as Ned. And in fact Ms. Fairley is 10 years younger than Sean Bean. So… what's your point exactly? That we should change the canon of the books to more "accurately" reflect what other people in Westeros may have done? That's really backwards logic.

      Quote  Reply

  408. kookykay
    Posted April 16, 2010 at 7:04 am | Permalink

    This casting choice is a huge turnoff!!

      Quote  Reply

  409. Maitlin Cohegan
    Posted April 16, 2010 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00091/michelle-fairley_91142a.jpg

    I'm sorry, but Fairley is way too old for this roll. If I'm not mistaken, isn't Catelyn in her 30s? Of course, everyone cast in the show is older than they should be.

      Quote  Reply

  410. Posted April 16, 2010 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    That's a picture where she is aged up, I think it's from the George Best movie where she plays an alcholic. Trust me, in other productions she looks like a 40 year old or something.

      Quote  Reply

  411. Codex
    Posted April 22, 2010 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    I am disapppointed. I was excited about seeing Jennifer with Sean Bean. She is awesome. Don't know Fairley. Hope it works out.

      Quote  Reply

  412. mark
    Posted April 26, 2010 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    your a loser, u know nothing!!

      Quote  Reply

  413. kookykay
    Posted May 13, 2010 at 7:28 am | Permalink

    at least I can spell :)

      Quote  Reply

  414. joe
    Posted May 18, 2010 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    very nasty! bet you are no beauty!!
    this actress is in fact a vey stunning woman, most of the pictures you see on the net she is in role for something.

      Quote  Reply

  415. joe
    Posted May 18, 2010 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    me personally i think it is a great move, fairley is a very well known theatre actress with a year or longer stint in broadway theatres . grrm is said to be delighted she has joined the cast , i think she will be fantastic in the role. stop being so bloody minded and give other actors a chance!!!!!!!!!!!

      Quote  Reply

  416. katie
    Posted May 19, 2010 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    with a name like "Shadallion" , should one say any more.. keep it clean this is in fact a well respected actress with an incredible pedgree of work to her name. lets judge Fairley on her work and cut this crap!!

      Quote  Reply

  417. jenny
    Posted May 19, 2010 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    I personally think Michelle Fairley would make an excellent choice as Catelyn Stark in HBO's Game of thrones as she looks more to the part that Jennifer Ehle. With all respect to Ehle i think Fairley is a much more experienced and professional actress. And to all you who think Michelle looks old, it doesn't take inestine to work out she is working and in role in most of her photos. I am very excited to see the series and and hoping for only the best which i am confident Michelle will bring to her performance.

      Quote  Reply

  418. katie
    Posted May 19, 2010 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    me to. some are saying they have never heard of Fairley, i had never heard of Ehle i had to google her. with it being filmed and based in Belfast i think it is great that the local talent it being used, good luck to them all. i am sure they will all do a fine job. lets face it if the first casting was working they would not have had to do a complete rejig of the cast!

      Quote  Reply

  419. katie
    Posted May 19, 2010 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    you sound like a right ignorant big blubber, typical if you are such a fan of grrms books you should be delighted they are taking the time to make adjustments, it shows things were not working. Bet your big fat and ginger!

      Quote  Reply

  420. kate
    Posted June 1, 2010 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    good choice

      Quote  Reply

  421. Nenad Danen
    Posted June 8, 2010 at 7:45 pm | Permalink

    I agree..Ms.Ehle is quite good if we dont look all her perfections in her.

      Quote  Reply

  422. Posted April 18, 2011 at 12:59 am | Permalink

    As a 39 year old woman I appreciate that Catelyn is a real woman and not a 25 year old goddess playing a mother of five. And the actress is a beautiful woman in her own right.. . However, she is much older older looking than I expected of the desirable Catelyn.

      Quote  Reply

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Before commenting, please read our moderation and spoiler policy.
Want an avatar with your comments? Comment using Twitter or Facebook or get a Gravatar.

Some helpful HTML tags. Wrap these tags around the appropriate text:
Add a link: <a href="INSERT-URL-HERE"> </a>
Bold text: <strong> </strong>
Italic text: <em> </em>
Spoiler: <b> </b>

  • Recent Comments

  • Media Updates

    Skull at Craster's Keep Trucks Skull at Mance's camp Wildlings in the snow Joffrey Cersei on bed
  • Tags

  • Archives

    • 2013 (347)
    • 2012 (550)
    • 2011 (512)
    • 2010 (309)
    • 2009 (174)
    • 2008 (47)