No, Emma Watson isn’t retiring from acting

BEVERLY HILLS, CA - MARCH 04: Emma Watson attends the 2018 Vanity Fair Oscar Party hosted by Radhika Jones at Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on March 4, 2018 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Mike Coppola/VF18/Getty Images for VF)
BEVERLY HILLS, CA - MARCH 04: Emma Watson attends the 2018 Vanity Fair Oscar Party hosted by Radhika Jones at Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on March 4, 2018 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Mike Coppola/VF18/Getty Images for VF)

Despite rumors to the contrary, Emma Watson is not retiring from acting. Wands down, people.

The other day, Twitter was lit up with despondent fans crestfallen that Harry Potter veteran Emma Watson, Hermione Granger herself, was retiring from acting, this after a series of inspiring roles in movies like Beauty and the Beast and Little Women, where she played Belle and Meg March respectively. Watson has definitely carved out a successful post-Potter niche for herself, and it would indeed be sad for such a talent to leave the screen so young.

Only she’s not leaving. The rumor got started when The Daily Mail — a publication known for mistake and exaggeration, FYI — suggested that she’d be leaving acting to settle down with partner Leo Robinton. “Emma Watson has gone ‘dormant’ according to her agent,” reads the article. “That appears to be movie-speak for she’s ‘given up acting.'”

From there, it was a hop, skip and a jump to a social media freakout. But Entertainment Weekly talked to Jason Weinberg, Watson’s manager at Untitled Entertainment, who put people at ease. “Emma’s social media accounts are dormant but her career isn’t,” he said in a statement.

Well, that was an exciting 24 hours, wasn’t it?

To stay up to date on everything fantasy, science fiction, and WiC, follow our all-encompassing Facebook page and sign up for our exclusive newsletter.

Get HBO, Starz, Showtime and MORE for FREE with a no-risk, 7-day free trial of Amazon Channels