When Amazon acquired MGM, it gained not only a legendary Hollywood studio but also its most prized asset: the James Bond franchise. MGM has held the distribution rights to the Bond films since purchasing United Artists, the original distributor of Dr. No, back in 1981. With this acquisition, Amazon also inherited MGM’s longstanding partnership with Eon Productions, the studio behind nearly every Bond film since 1962.
At the helm of Eon and the Bond franchise is Barbara Broccoli, who has consistently asserted her authority over the franchise. Now, according to recent reports, tensions are brewing between Broccoli and Amazon, potentially jeopardizing the future of 007 after Daniel Craig’s departure from the lead role.
A Wall Street Journal article sheds light on the friction. Broccoli — who, love or hate her creative decisions, is undeniably the foremost expert in crafting Bond films — is reportedly less than thrilled with Amazon’s involvement. Her reservations seem rooted in distrust of Amazon’s algorithm-driven approach, which she views as "incompatible" with the cinematic storytelling that has defined Bond for decades.
According to the WSJ, Broccoli has told confidants that Amazon, a company built on selling consumer goods, is ill-equipped to handle the nuances of a globally iconic character like Bond. When Amazon executives floated the idea of creating Bond-related TV spin-offs, Broccoli’s sharp response was reportedly, "Did you read the contract?"
Adding fuel to the fire are reports that Broccoli has bluntly criticized her new corporate partners, allegedly calling them "f***ing idiots." While the harsh words may be hearsay, they draw attention to a growing divide. It’s been three years since Craig’s final outing as Bond in No Time to Die. The lack of progress on the next installment is becoming increasingly glaring. No new Bond actor has been announced despite rumors and betting, nor is there even a script in development, leaving fans and industry insiders alike speculating about what’s next for the storied series.
This conflict touches on the broader question of how legacy franchises can and should adapt to the era of streaming and corporate consolidation. For decades, Bond has been synonymous with the grandeur of the silver screen, with each film meticulously crafted as a cultural event. Broccoli’s insistence on preserving this legacy speaks to her desire to keep Bond’s identity intact. However, Amazon’s business model seeks to maximize content output and leverage intellectual property across platforms. This creates a clear philosophical divide.
Beyond the creative and business differences, there are practical implications for the future of Bond. Without a clear direction, the franchise risks losing momentum, something that could impact its cultural relevance. The lack of a new Bond actor or script is concerning not just for fans but also for a global box office that has long relied on the spy’s adventures as a guaranteed draw. If Amazon and Eon cannot find common ground, the potential fallout could include delays, diminished quality, or a reimagining of Bond that alienates its core audience.
These rumors should be approached with caution, as sources remain unnamed. However, it’s clear that Broccoli’s vision for Bond and Amazon’s business strategies are struggling to align. Whether this tension will derail the franchise or lead to a creative breakthrough remains to be seen, but for now, the future of the Bond franchise is in limbo.
To stay up to date on everything fantasy, science fiction, and WiC, follow our all-encompassing Facebook page and Twitter account, sign up for our exclusive newsletter and check out our YouTube channel.